HISTORY AND POLITICS AS IF WE STILL LIVED IN THE HOLOCENE

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1111/hith.12311
BRAD S. GREGORY
{"title":"HISTORY AND POLITICS AS IF WE STILL LIVED IN THE HOLOCENE","authors":"BRAD S. GREGORY","doi":"10.1111/hith.12311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><i>The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity</i> (2021), by David Graeber and David Wengrow, is a monumental, boldly revisionist study of the human past from the last ice age to the present. It is geared explicitly toward the present in political terms and seeks to explain how primordial forms of human freedom were lost in ways that resulted in our current structures of violence and domination. The authors explore a vast range of prehistoric, ancient, and non-Western peoples to undermine (neo)evolutionist, stadial theories of long-term human development, particularly any that imply determinism, inevitability, or teleology. If so many peoples in the past were so much freer than we are today, how is it that we got stuck? And are we really as stuck as we think? Graeber and Wengrow successfully undermine the social scientific template of stage-based human development from hunter-gatherers to modern capitalist nation-states, but their book suffers from two major omissions. First, they ignore almost entirely the Anthropocene epoch and show no grasp of its implications for their analysis of the present or prospects for the future. Second, their “new history of humanity” ignores the history that is most relevant to answering their own questions about how we have arrived globally in our current structures of violence and domination: the early modern and modern history of expansionist, colonialist, capitalist, belligerent, imperialist Western European nations and their extensions since the fifteenth century. These two omissions are connected: it is disproportionately the history of the (early) modern West before and after the Industrial Revolution that explains how the planet arrived in the Anthropocene with the “Great Acceleration” around the mid-twentieth century. But heeding this history and its consequences would have undermined the authors’ upbeat political vision about our prospects for the future—essentially, a recycled Enlightenment vision about human self-determination and individual freedom that depends on environmental exploitation as if we still lived in the Holocene. For all its undoubted achievement, <i>The Dawn of Everything</i> neglects the history that is most salient to answering the main questions its own authors pose. What matters most about that history is not that it was inevitable but that it was actual—and that its cumulative consequences remain with us.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"62 3","pages":"439-461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.12311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity (2021), by David Graeber and David Wengrow, is a monumental, boldly revisionist study of the human past from the last ice age to the present. It is geared explicitly toward the present in political terms and seeks to explain how primordial forms of human freedom were lost in ways that resulted in our current structures of violence and domination. The authors explore a vast range of prehistoric, ancient, and non-Western peoples to undermine (neo)evolutionist, stadial theories of long-term human development, particularly any that imply determinism, inevitability, or teleology. If so many peoples in the past were so much freer than we are today, how is it that we got stuck? And are we really as stuck as we think? Graeber and Wengrow successfully undermine the social scientific template of stage-based human development from hunter-gatherers to modern capitalist nation-states, but their book suffers from two major omissions. First, they ignore almost entirely the Anthropocene epoch and show no grasp of its implications for their analysis of the present or prospects for the future. Second, their “new history of humanity” ignores the history that is most relevant to answering their own questions about how we have arrived globally in our current structures of violence and domination: the early modern and modern history of expansionist, colonialist, capitalist, belligerent, imperialist Western European nations and their extensions since the fifteenth century. These two omissions are connected: it is disproportionately the history of the (early) modern West before and after the Industrial Revolution that explains how the planet arrived in the Anthropocene with the “Great Acceleration” around the mid-twentieth century. But heeding this history and its consequences would have undermined the authors’ upbeat political vision about our prospects for the future—essentially, a recycled Enlightenment vision about human self-determination and individual freedom that depends on environmental exploitation as if we still lived in the Holocene. For all its undoubted achievement, The Dawn of Everything neglects the history that is most salient to answering the main questions its own authors pose. What matters most about that history is not that it was inevitable but that it was actual—and that its cumulative consequences remain with us.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史和政治就好像我们还生活在全新世
《万物的黎明:人类的新历史》(2021)由大卫·格雷伯和大卫·温格罗合著,是对从上一个冰河时代到现在的人类历史的一次里程碑式的、大胆的修正主义研究。它从政治角度明确地指向现在,并试图解释人类自由的原始形式是如何以某种方式丧失的,从而导致了我们目前的暴力和统治结构。作者探索了大量史前、古代和非西方民族,以破坏(新)进化论者关于人类长期发展的传统理论,特别是任何暗示决定论、必然性或目的论的理论。如果过去有那么多的人比我们今天自由得多,我们怎么会被困住呢?我们真的像我们想象的那样被困住了吗?格雷伯和温格罗成功地破坏了人类从狩猎采集者到现代资本主义民族国家的发展阶段的社会科学模板,但他们的书有两个主要的遗漏。首先,他们几乎完全忽略了人类世,也没有领会它对他们分析现在或未来前景的影响。其次,他们的“人类新历史”忽略了与回答他们自己的问题最相关的历史,即我们是如何在当前的暴力和统治结构中到达全球的:扩张主义、殖民主义、资本主义、好战的、帝国主义的西欧国家及其自15世纪以来的扩张主义和现代历史。这两项遗漏是相互关联的:正是工业革命前后(早期)现代西方的历史不成比例地解释了地球是如何在20世纪中期左右以“大加速”进入人类世的。但是,关注这段历史及其后果会削弱作者对我们未来前景的乐观政治愿景——本质上,这是一种重复的启蒙运动愿景,即人类自决和个人自由依赖于环境开发,就好像我们仍然生活在全新世。尽管《万物的黎明》取得了毋庸置疑的成就,但它忽略了对回答作者提出的主要问题最重要的历史。那段历史最重要的不是它是不可避免的,而是它是真实存在的,而且它的累积后果一直伴随着我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History and Theory
History and Theory Multiple-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information HOW SHOULD HISTORIANS EMPATHIZE? “TESTIMONY STOPS WHERE HISTORY BEGINS”: UNDERSTANDING AND ETHICS IN RELATION TO HISTORICAL AND PRACTICAL PASTS A HOUSE WITH EXPOSED BEAMS: INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING AND HISTORIANS’ ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES AS SCHOLAR-TEACHERS OPEN LETTERS IN CLOSED SOCIETIES: THE VALUES OF HISTORIANS UNDER ATTACK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1