{"title":"From Garrisoned District to Chinese Town: Land and Boundaries at the Kowloon Walled City, 1898-1912","authors":"Y. Wang","doi":"10.16995/ah.8292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most of its two-century-long existence from about 1810 to 1994, Hong Kong’s Kowloon Walled City housed built structures, but its classification as architecture has remained tenuous. Not until the years prior to its demolition did it receive sustained attention from architects and architectural historians as a dense, slum dwelling of informal multi-story buildings. However, the architectural nature of the six-acre area predated its late 20th-century state. From its founding as a Qing military outpost, it sustained various structural additions and renovations, including an imperial Chinese administrative complex known as a yamen [衙門] and an outer wall, after which the Walled City was named. \n\nAgainst the grain of scholarship that has focused on the Walled City’s postwar, informal architecture, this paper considers the site’s early years, arguing that the Walled City’s yamen [衙門] and outer wall played an outsize role in the region’s land management practices. These two architectural structures make legible the Walled City’s evolution from a Qing administrative zone to a crowded slum dwelling. The Convention of 1898 ushered in a British-led land surveying effort throughout the New Territories region of Hong Kong, followed by the creation of an intricate bureaucracy for managing land lots. This clash of empires thus saw the use of two forms of land knowledge—Qing land deeds and British cadastral land surveys—in Hong Kong. In between these systems existed the Walled City, its inhabitation falling outside the British conception of land division, but its historical contours very much shaped by the architectural boundaries that gave it its name.","PeriodicalId":41517,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Histories","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.8292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
For most of its two-century-long existence from about 1810 to 1994, Hong Kong’s Kowloon Walled City housed built structures, but its classification as architecture has remained tenuous. Not until the years prior to its demolition did it receive sustained attention from architects and architectural historians as a dense, slum dwelling of informal multi-story buildings. However, the architectural nature of the six-acre area predated its late 20th-century state. From its founding as a Qing military outpost, it sustained various structural additions and renovations, including an imperial Chinese administrative complex known as a yamen [衙門] and an outer wall, after which the Walled City was named.
Against the grain of scholarship that has focused on the Walled City’s postwar, informal architecture, this paper considers the site’s early years, arguing that the Walled City’s yamen [衙門] and outer wall played an outsize role in the region’s land management practices. These two architectural structures make legible the Walled City’s evolution from a Qing administrative zone to a crowded slum dwelling. The Convention of 1898 ushered in a British-led land surveying effort throughout the New Territories region of Hong Kong, followed by the creation of an intricate bureaucracy for managing land lots. This clash of empires thus saw the use of two forms of land knowledge—Qing land deeds and British cadastral land surveys—in Hong Kong. In between these systems existed the Walled City, its inhabitation falling outside the British conception of land division, but its historical contours very much shaped by the architectural boundaries that gave it its name.
在大约1810年至1994年长达两个世纪的历史中,香港九龙寨城的大部分时间里都有建筑,但它作为建筑的分类仍然很脆弱。直到拆除前几年,它才受到建筑师和建筑历史学家的持续关注,因为它是一个由非正式的多层建筑组成的密集的贫民窟。然而,这片占地6英亩的土地的建筑性质早于20世纪晚期的国家。从作为清朝的军事前哨开始,它进行了各种结构的增加和翻新,包括一个被称为衙门的中国帝国行政建筑群[衙]和一个外墙,城墙就是以它命名的。与关注城墙战后非正式建筑的学术研究不同,本文考虑了该遗址的早期,认为城墙的衙门[衙]和外墙在该地区的土地管理实践中发挥了巨大的作用。这两种建筑结构清晰地展现了寨城从清代行政区到拥挤贫民窟的演变过程。1898年的《香港土地公约》(Convention of 1898)开启了英国主导的香港新界地区土地测量工作,随后建立了一个复杂的机构来管理土地。因此,在这场帝国的冲突中,香港使用了两种形式的土地知识——清朝的土地契约和英国的地籍土地测量。在这些系统之间存在着城墙城,它的居住范围超出了英国人的土地划分概念,但它的历史轮廓在很大程度上是由建筑边界塑造的,因此得名。