Why Police Shouldn't Be Allowed to Lie to Suspects

IF 0.8 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Journal of the American Philosophical Association Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.1017/apa.2022.1

Samuel M. Duncan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, I argue that it is morally wrong for police to lie to suspects in interrogations and that it should be legally prohibited. I base my argument on broadly Kantian considerations about respect for autonomy: Respect for rational agency forbids lying to suspects and there is no plausible and compelling rationale for allowing police to lie to suspects in typical cases of interrogation.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

为什么警察不应该被允许对嫌疑人撒谎

在这篇文章中，我认为警察在审讯中对嫌疑人撒谎在道德上是错误的，这应该在法律上被禁止。我的论点基于康德对尊重自主性的广泛考虑:尊重理性代理禁止对嫌疑人撒谎，在典型的审讯案件中，允许警察对嫌疑人撒谎没有合理的和令人信服的理由。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of the American Philosophical Association PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Appearing quarterly in print and online, the Journal of the American Philosophical Association provides a platform for original work in all areas of philosophy. The Journal aims to publish compelling papers written in a way that can be appreciated by philosophers of every persuasion and to review papers quickly (typically within 30 days of submission) and fairly (using a triple anonymous review system), encouraging succinct, constructive reports. Papers are published online early via FirstView (typically within 8 weeks of acceptance).

期刊最新文献

What Do Beginning Students Think about Philosophy before Their First College Course? Standpoint Epistemology and Epistemic Peerhood: A Defense of Epistemic Privilege Doing Moral Philosophy Without ‘Normativity’ Explanation and the Right to Explanation How to Disrupt a Social Script