Divine Wisdom, Natural Order, and Human Intervention: Leibniz on the Intersection of Theology, Teleology, and Technology

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Studia Neoaristotelica Pub Date : 2017-11-16 DOI:10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171426
P. Kwasniewski
{"title":"Divine Wisdom, Natural Order, and Human Intervention: Leibniz on the Intersection of Theology, Teleology, and Technology","authors":"P. Kwasniewski","doi":"10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Divine Wisdom, Natural Order, and Human Intervention Leibniz on the Intersection of Theology, Teleology, and Technology In the Discourse on Metaphysics Leibniz addresses how human beings ought to intervene in a preharmonized world and contribute to the unfolding of its goodness. His view exhibits an instructive tension between belief in a providentially fixed natural order, on the one hand, and, on the other, a characteristically early modern belief in a world of infinite possibilities for human actors, that is, developers of technology. Other texts in Leibniz, as well as comparison with Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant, helps to reveal the extent to which Leibniz is torn between venerating the ancient tradition of natural philosophy, a purely “contemplative” discipline, and embracing the modern project of mastery of nature, a pragmatic and transformative enterprise.","PeriodicalId":55635,"journal":{"name":"Studia Neoaristotelica","volume":"14 1","pages":"115-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Neoaristotelica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/STUDNEOAR20171426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Divine Wisdom, Natural Order, and Human Intervention Leibniz on the Intersection of Theology, Teleology, and Technology In the Discourse on Metaphysics Leibniz addresses how human beings ought to intervene in a preharmonized world and contribute to the unfolding of its goodness. His view exhibits an instructive tension between belief in a providentially fixed natural order, on the one hand, and, on the other, a characteristically early modern belief in a world of infinite possibilities for human actors, that is, developers of technology. Other texts in Leibniz, as well as comparison with Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant, helps to reveal the extent to which Leibniz is torn between venerating the ancient tradition of natural philosophy, a purely “contemplative” discipline, and embracing the modern project of mastery of nature, a pragmatic and transformative enterprise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神圣智慧、自然秩序和人类干预:莱布尼茨论神学、目的论和技术的交叉
神的智慧、自然秩序和人类干预莱布尼茨谈神学、目的论和技术的交叉在形而上学的论述中,莱布尼茨阐述了人类应该如何干预一个预和谐的世界,并为其善的展现做出贡献。他的观点展示了一种富有启发性的张力,一方面是对天意固定的自然秩序的信念,另一方面是早期现代人对人类行为者(即技术开发者)拥有无限可能性的世界的特有信念。莱布尼茨的其他文本,以及与亚里士多德、阿奎那和康德的比较,有助于揭示莱布尼茨在多大程度上在尊重自然哲学的古老传统(一种纯粹的“沉思”学科)和拥抱掌握自然的现代计划(一种务实和变革的事业)之间左右为难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Neoaristotelica
Studia Neoaristotelica Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Studia Neoaristotelica is a peer-reviewed, scholarly journal devoted to the promotion of Aristotelian philosophy broadly conceived, drawing on the rich legacy of the scholastic tradition and contemporary analytical metaphysics. Special emphasis is placed on the most advanced forms of scholastic thought that emerged during the Renaissance and Baroque periods. Our vision is to work toward a philosophical synthesis of analytic and scholastic methods and ideas, providing a contribution to Christian philosophy as well as wider secular thought. The journal is published by Editiones Scholasticae and the University of South Bohemia Faculty of Theology.
期刊最新文献
Leonardo da Vinci’s Aphorism on the Aristotle-Alexander Legend: Sources, Meaning, And Its Reception by Francis Bacon Meeting Harman’s Challenge Zavádění předmětů v aristotelismu Být v či nebýt v? Filomathés čili o odbornosti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1