Refugee Rights Across Regions: A Comparative Overview of Legislative Good Practices in Latin America and the EU

IF 2.2 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY Refugee Survey Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.1093/rsq/hdaa011
L. F. Freier, Jean-Pierre Gauci
{"title":"Refugee Rights Across Regions: A Comparative Overview of Legislative Good Practices in Latin America and the EU","authors":"L. F. Freier, Jean-Pierre Gauci","doi":"10.1093/rsq/hdaa011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has identified a number of legislative good practices in Latin American asylum and refugee laws. At the same time, academics and policy-makers have long called for cross-regional comparative analyses of policies and laws to allow different regions to learn from each other’s best practices. In this article, we compare refugee legislations of Latin American countries with European Union protection standards based on UNHCR’s legislative good practices across three areas: (i) Core Principles and Scope of Protection; (ii) Procedural Safeguards and Guarantees for Vulnerable Groups; and (iii) Integration. We find that six of 19 refugee laws in Latin America provide more expansive protection than the Common European Asylum System framework, whereas other Latin American countries fall behind. The gap between Latin American legislations and European Union protection standards is closer regarding procedural safeguards, the protection of vulnerable groups, and integration provisions. Finally, Latin American countries, on average, score significantly below the European Union regarding the core principles of asylum and the scope of protection. In the second part of the article, we engage in a qualitative discussion of these legislative good practices to allow for cross-fertilization, and deliver policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":39907,"journal":{"name":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","volume":"39 1","pages":"321-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/rsq/hdaa011","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refugee Survey Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaa011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

The office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has identified a number of legislative good practices in Latin American asylum and refugee laws. At the same time, academics and policy-makers have long called for cross-regional comparative analyses of policies and laws to allow different regions to learn from each other’s best practices. In this article, we compare refugee legislations of Latin American countries with European Union protection standards based on UNHCR’s legislative good practices across three areas: (i) Core Principles and Scope of Protection; (ii) Procedural Safeguards and Guarantees for Vulnerable Groups; and (iii) Integration. We find that six of 19 refugee laws in Latin America provide more expansive protection than the Common European Asylum System framework, whereas other Latin American countries fall behind. The gap between Latin American legislations and European Union protection standards is closer regarding procedural safeguards, the protection of vulnerable groups, and integration provisions. Finally, Latin American countries, on average, score significantly below the European Union regarding the core principles of asylum and the scope of protection. In the second part of the article, we engage in a qualitative discussion of these legislative good practices to allow for cross-fertilization, and deliver policy recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨区域的难民权利:拉丁美洲和欧盟立法良好做法的比较概述
联合国难民事务高级专员办事处(难民专员办事处)确定了拉丁美洲庇护和难民法中的一些良好立法做法。与此同时,学者和决策者长期以来一直呼吁对政策和法律进行跨地区比较分析,使不同地区能够相互学习彼此的最佳实践。在本文中,我们将拉丁美洲国家的难民立法与欧盟在以下三个方面的保护标准进行比较:(i)核心原则和保护范围;对弱势群体的程序保障和保障;(三)一体化。我们发现,拉丁美洲19项难民法中有6项提供了比欧洲共同庇护体系框架更广泛的保护,而其他拉丁美洲国家则落后于此。拉丁美洲立法与欧洲联盟保护标准之间在程序保障、保护脆弱群体和一体化规定方面的差距更大。最后,拉丁美洲国家在庇护的核心原则和保护范围方面的平均得分明显低于欧盟。在本文的第二部分中,我们将对这些立法上的良好实践进行定性讨论,以实现相互借鉴,并提出政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Refugee Survey Quarterly
Refugee Survey Quarterly Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Refugee Survey Quarterly is published four times a year and serves as an authoritative source on current refugee and international protection issues. Each issue contains a selection of articles and documents on a specific theme, as well as book reviews on refugee-related literature. With this distinctive thematic approach, the journal crosses in each issue the entire range of refugee research on a particular key challenge to forced migration. The journal seeks to act as a link between scholars and practitioners by highlighting the evolving nature of refugee protection as reflected in the practice of UNHCR and other major actors in the field.
期刊最新文献
The Challenge of Evaluating the Impact of NGOs on the Human Capital and Life Satisfaction of Syrian Refugees in Turkey “Where is Home?” Perceptions of Home and Future among Ukrainian Refugees in Norway Recognising Palestinian Refugees: Applicability of Article 1D of the 1951 Refugee Convention in Turkey Wanted Refugees: The Forming of an Instrument Constituency for Refugee Resettlement in the European Union Plaintiff S99: Rewriting Refugee Law Through a Trauma-Informed Lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1