Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748
Markus Bertl , Peeter Ross , Dirk Draheim
{"title":"Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors","authors":"Markus Bertl ,&nbsp;Peeter Ross ,&nbsp;Dirk Draheim","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Currently, health care<span> is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes.</span></p></div><div><h3>Aim &amp; Methods</h3><p>This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patient-centric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><p>The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background

Currently, health care is expert-centric, especially with regard to decision-making. Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) or interconnected electronic health records (EHRs) suffer from low adoption rates. In the rare cases of technically successful implementation, they often result in inefficient or error-prone processes.

Aim & Methods

This paper explores the state of the art in AI-based digital decision support systems (DDSSs). To overcome the low adoption rates, we propose a systematic strategy for bringing DDSS research into clinical practice based on a design science approach. DDSSs can transform health care to be more innovative, patient-centric, accurate and efficient. We contribute by providing a framework for the successful development, evaluation and analysis of systems for AI-based decision-making. This framework is then evaluated using focus group interviews.

Results

Centred around our framework, we define a systematic approach for the use of AI in health care. Our systematic AI support approach highlights essential perspectives on DDSSs for systematic development and analysis. The aim is to develop and promote robust and optimal practices for clinical investigation and evaluation of DDSS in order to encourage their adoption rates. The framework contains the following dimensions: disease, data, technology, user groups, validation, decision and maturity.

Conclusion

DDSSs focusing on only one framework dimension are generally not successful; therefore, we propose to consider each framework dimension during analysis, design, implementation and evaluation so as to raise the number of DDSSs used in clinical practice.

Public Interest Summary

The digital transformation of the healthcare sector creates the potential for the sector to be more accurate, efficient and patient-centric using AI, or so-called digital decision support systems. In this research, we explore why these systems are needed and how they can be successfully implemented in clinical practice. For this, we propose a systematic approach based on our conceptual framework. Against this background, we present our vision for further advancing these technologies. We see our systematic AI support as a primary driver, with the possibility to facilitate the much-needed breakthrough of decision support systems in health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健部门决策的系统人工智能支持:障碍和成功因素
背景目前,医疗保健是以专家为中心的,尤其是在决策方面。人工智能(AI)或互联电子健康记录(EHR)等创新的采用率较低。在技术上成功实施的极少数情况下,它们往往会导致流程效率低下或容易出错。目标&;方法探讨基于人工智能的数字决策支持系统(DDSS)的技术现状。为了克服低采用率的问题,我们提出了一种基于设计科学方法的系统策略,将DDSS研究纳入临床实践。DDSS可以使医疗保健更加创新、以患者为中心、准确和高效。我们为基于人工智能的决策系统的成功开发、评估和分析提供了一个框架。然后使用焦点小组访谈对该框架进行评估。结果围绕我们的框架,我们定义了一种在医疗保健中使用人工智能的系统方法。我们系统的人工智能支持方法突出了DDSS的基本观点,用于系统开发和分析。目的是开发和推广DDSS临床调查和评估的稳健和最佳实践,以鼓励其采用率。该框架包含以下维度:疾病、数据、技术、用户群体、验证、决策和成熟度。结论只关注一个框架维度的DDSS通常不成功;因此,我们建议在分析、设计、实施和评估过程中考虑每个框架维度,以提高临床实践中使用的DDSS的数量。公共利益总结医疗保健行业的数字化转型为该行业创造了使用人工智能或所谓的数字决策支持系统更加准确、高效和以患者为中心的潜力。在这项研究中,我们探讨了为什么需要这些系统,以及如何在临床实践中成功实施这些系统。为此,我们提出了一种基于概念框架的系统方法。在此背景下,我们提出了进一步推进这些技术的愿景。我们将系统的人工智能支持视为主要驱动力,有可能促进医疗保健决策支持系统的急需突破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Identifying the risk factors of patient safety in internet hospitals: A mixed methods study Introduction of novel complex integrated care models supported by digital health interventions in European primary settings: a scoping review Trends in Medicare Charges, Reimbursements, and Utilization for Ophthalmic Versus Non-Ophthalmic Procedures A nationwide digital maturity assessment of hospitals – Results from the German DigitalRadar Applying Experienced-Based Co-Design principles to improve digital health demand management processes in a large metropolitan multi-hospital health system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1