How the War Began: Conceptualizing Conflict Escalation in Ukraine’s Donbas

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY Soviet and Post Soviet Review Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.30965/18763324-20201380
Jakob Hauter
{"title":"How the War Began: Conceptualizing Conflict Escalation in Ukraine’s Donbas","authors":"Jakob Hauter","doi":"10.30965/18763324-20201380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis article proposes a new theoretical framework based on conflict escalation theory and the concept of critical junctures to facilitate a more transparent analysis of the war in Ukraine’s Donbas. It argues that researchers have proposed a variety of causes of the outbreak of violence in the region. However, in the absence of an overarching theoretical framework, it remains difficult to analyse the interplay of these causes and compare their explanatory power. In response, this article develops a theory-guided escalation sequence model. According to this model, the conflict’s formative phase consisted of an escalation sequence that lasted from April until August 2014 and comprised six critical junctures. This article argues that attempts to explain the conflict should be evaluated and compared in terms of their ability to explain these critical junctures. It concludes that similar escalation sequence models could improve research on armed conflict beyond the case of the Donbas.","PeriodicalId":41969,"journal":{"name":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet and Post Soviet Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30965/18763324-20201380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article proposes a new theoretical framework based on conflict escalation theory and the concept of critical junctures to facilitate a more transparent analysis of the war in Ukraine’s Donbas. It argues that researchers have proposed a variety of causes of the outbreak of violence in the region. However, in the absence of an overarching theoretical framework, it remains difficult to analyse the interplay of these causes and compare their explanatory power. In response, this article develops a theory-guided escalation sequence model. According to this model, the conflict’s formative phase consisted of an escalation sequence that lasted from April until August 2014 and comprised six critical junctures. This article argues that attempts to explain the conflict should be evaluated and compared in terms of their ability to explain these critical junctures. It concludes that similar escalation sequence models could improve research on armed conflict beyond the case of the Donbas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战争是如何开始的:乌克兰顿巴斯冲突升级的概念
本文提出了一个基于冲突升级理论和关键节点概念的新的理论框架,以促进对乌克兰顿巴斯战争的更透明的分析。它认为,研究人员提出了该地区爆发暴力的各种原因。然而,在缺乏总体理论框架的情况下,分析这些原因的相互作用并比较它们的解释力仍然很困难。为此,本文建立了一个以理论为指导的升级序列模型。根据该模型,冲突的形成阶段包括从2014年4月到8月的升级序列,包括六个关键节点。本文认为,解释冲突的尝试应该根据它们解释这些关键时刻的能力进行评估和比较。它的结论是,类似的升级序列模型可以改进对顿巴斯以外武装冲突的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Bloomsbury Handbook of the Russian Revolution, edited by Geoffrey Swain, et al. Editor’s Note Stalin: Piat’let Grazhdanskoi voiny i gosudarstvennogo stroitel’stva, 1917–1922 gg, written by Il’ia S. Rat’kovskii Authoritarian Laughter: Political Humor and Soviet Dystopia in Lithuania, written by Neringa Klumbytė Stalin as Warlord, written by Alfred J. Rieber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1