Territorialisation, Ambivalence, and Representational Spaces in Gilgit-Baltistan

IF 0.1 Q4 HISTORY Transcultural Studies Pub Date : 2017-10-10 DOI:10.17885/heiup.ts.2017.1.23585
A. Bouzas
{"title":"Territorialisation, Ambivalence, and Representational Spaces in Gilgit-Baltistan","authors":"A. Bouzas","doi":"10.17885/heiup.ts.2017.1.23585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article unveils the complexities of spatiality in the Kashmir borderland with reference to the problem of spatial conceptualisation of South Asian disputed border zones. It focuses on processes of territorialisation (new meanings of territorial control) in Gilgit-Baltistan, a territory under the control of Pakistan but associated with the Kashmir dispute. Through the examination of the production of space in Gilgit-Baltistan, and by looking at the specific case of the Baltistan division, the article highlights inconsistencies that denote a shift in the sense of belonging by groups in Baltistan. This shift is marked by a condition of ambivalence, due to the territory’s peripheral position and its status as a border zone with a great potential for confrontation. Various groups in Baltistan are challenging the prevailing context with the revival of cultural and symbolic expressions that transcend existing boundaries and thus claim forms of regional belonging beyond current separations.","PeriodicalId":42064,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"197-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.ts.2017.1.23585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The article unveils the complexities of spatiality in the Kashmir borderland with reference to the problem of spatial conceptualisation of South Asian disputed border zones. It focuses on processes of territorialisation (new meanings of territorial control) in Gilgit-Baltistan, a territory under the control of Pakistan but associated with the Kashmir dispute. Through the examination of the production of space in Gilgit-Baltistan, and by looking at the specific case of the Baltistan division, the article highlights inconsistencies that denote a shift in the sense of belonging by groups in Baltistan. This shift is marked by a condition of ambivalence, due to the territory’s peripheral position and its status as a border zone with a great potential for confrontation. Various groups in Baltistan are challenging the prevailing context with the revival of cultural and symbolic expressions that transcend existing boundaries and thus claim forms of regional belonging beyond current separations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦的地域化、歧义性和表征空间
本文结合南亚争议边界区的空间概念化问题,揭示了克什米尔边界空间性的复杂性。它关注的是吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦的领土化进程(领土控制的新含义),该领土由巴基斯坦控制,但与克什米尔争端有关。通过考察吉尔吉特-巴尔蒂斯坦的空间生产,并通过观察巴尔蒂斯坦分裂的具体案例,文章强调了不一致之处,这些不一致之处表明巴尔蒂斯坦群体的归属感发生了转变。这种转变的特点是矛盾的状态,因为该领土的外围地位及其作为一个极有可能发生对抗的边界地区的地位。巴尔蒂斯坦的各个群体正在挑战主流语境,复兴超越现有边界的文化和象征表达,从而主张超越当前分离的区域归属形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transcultural Studies is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Cluster of Excellence “Asia and Europe in a Global Context: The Dynamics of Transculturality” of the Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
期刊最新文献
An Interview with Robert Quinn, Founding Executive Director of the Global Network Scholars at Risk Introduction (français) L’enseignement supérieur au cœur de la tourmente libanaise Academic Freedom, Autonomy of Universities: Turning Point in the Evolution of Industrial Societies Benny Tai – Testing the Bottom-Line of Academic Freedom and Freedom of Expression in Hong Kong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1