{"title":"L2 tolerance of pragmatic violations of informativeness","authors":"Shuo Feng","doi":"10.1075/lab.21064.fen","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study sets out to investigate second language (L2) speakers’ derivation of pragmatic inferences and tolerance\n of violations of informativeness in two types of inferences, i.e., ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. The results of a\n graded judgment task revealed that pragmatic tolerance is inference-specific: L2 speakers were overly tolerant of underinformative\n statements in ad hoc implicatures than in contrastive inference. In addition, L2 speakers were found to be more relaxed with\n overinformativeness than underinformativeness in contrastive inference. The fact that L2 speakers tend to be redundant\n (overinformative) than ambiguous (underinformative) is further discussed with the Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis (Lozano, 2016). This study hopes to contribute to a more find-grained understanding of L2\n speakers’ abilities of deriving pragmatic inferences.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21064.fen","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This study sets out to investigate second language (L2) speakers’ derivation of pragmatic inferences and tolerance
of violations of informativeness in two types of inferences, i.e., ad hoc implicatures and contrastive inference. The results of a
graded judgment task revealed that pragmatic tolerance is inference-specific: L2 speakers were overly tolerant of underinformative
statements in ad hoc implicatures than in contrastive inference. In addition, L2 speakers were found to be more relaxed with
overinformativeness than underinformativeness in contrastive inference. The fact that L2 speakers tend to be redundant
(overinformative) than ambiguous (underinformative) is further discussed with the Pragmatic Principles Violation Hypothesis (Lozano, 2016). This study hopes to contribute to a more find-grained understanding of L2
speakers’ abilities of deriving pragmatic inferences.
期刊介绍:
LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.