Indirect cronyism and its underlying exchange logic: How managers’ particularism orientation and the third Party’s hierarchical power strengthen its existence

IF 3.4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104234
Xiao-Ping Chen , Han Ren
{"title":"Indirect cronyism and its underlying exchange logic: How managers’ particularism orientation and the third Party’s hierarchical power strengthen its existence","authors":"Xiao-Ping Chen ,&nbsp;Han Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we conceptualize indirect cronyism as a phenomenon in which managers show favoritism to indirect <em>guanxihu</em><span> subordinates who have informal, particular, and personal connections with a third party (e.g., another manager) and demonstrate its prevalent existence in Chinese organizations. We further explore crucial factors (i.e., the manager’s particularism orientation and the third party’s hierarchical position in the organization) that may play a role in whether managers engage in indirect cronyism and downstream consequences on other members of the organization. We draw on the indirect reciprocity logic embedded in social exchange theory to predict two underlying motives to explain why managers engage in indirect cronyism: (a) fulfilling their felt obligation to favor the indirect </span><em>guanxihu</em> subordinate and (b) strengthening their own <em>guanxi</em> with the third party. Results from three scenario-based experiments and one field study sampling a total of 1,559 working adults provide consistent support for our theoretical reasoning and hypotheses. We discuss the theoretical contributions this paper makes to advance the <em>guanxi</em> and cronyism literatures, as well as the practical implications of our findings for Chinese organizations and beyond.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48442,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper, we conceptualize indirect cronyism as a phenomenon in which managers show favoritism to indirect guanxihu subordinates who have informal, particular, and personal connections with a third party (e.g., another manager) and demonstrate its prevalent existence in Chinese organizations. We further explore crucial factors (i.e., the manager’s particularism orientation and the third party’s hierarchical position in the organization) that may play a role in whether managers engage in indirect cronyism and downstream consequences on other members of the organization. We draw on the indirect reciprocity logic embedded in social exchange theory to predict two underlying motives to explain why managers engage in indirect cronyism: (a) fulfilling their felt obligation to favor the indirect guanxihu subordinate and (b) strengthening their own guanxi with the third party. Results from three scenario-based experiments and one field study sampling a total of 1,559 working adults provide consistent support for our theoretical reasoning and hypotheses. We discuss the theoretical contributions this paper makes to advance the guanxi and cronyism literatures, as well as the practical implications of our findings for Chinese organizations and beyond.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
间接任人唯亲及其潜在的交换逻辑:管理者的特殊主义取向和第三方的等级权力如何强化其存在
在本文中,我们将间接任人唯亲定义为管理者对与第三方(如另一位管理者)有非正式的、特殊的和个人关系的间接关系的下属表现出偏袒的现象,并证明了这种现象在中国组织中普遍存在。我们进一步探讨了关键因素(即管理者的特殊主义取向和第三方在组织中的等级地位),这些因素可能在管理者是否参与间接任人唯亲及其对组织其他成员的下游后果中发挥作用。我们利用嵌入在社会交换理论中的间接互惠逻辑来预测两种潜在动机,以解释为什么管理者从事间接任人唯亲:(a)履行他们感觉有义务支持间接关系的下属;(b)加强自己与第三方的关系。三个基于场景的实验和一个对1559名在职成年人的实地调查的结果为我们的理论推理和假设提供了一致的支持。我们讨论了本文对推进关系与任人唯亲研究的理论贡献,以及我们的研究结果对中国组织及其他国家的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes publishes fundamental research in organizational behavior, organizational psychology, and human cognition, judgment, and decision-making. The journal features articles that present original empirical research, theory development, meta-analysis, and methodological advancements relevant to the substantive domains served by the journal. Topics covered by the journal include perception, cognition, judgment, attitudes, emotion, well-being, motivation, choice, and performance. We are interested in articles that investigate these topics as they pertain to individuals, dyads, groups, and other social collectives. For each topic, we place a premium on articles that make fundamental and substantial contributions to understanding psychological processes relevant to human attitudes, cognitions, and behavior in organizations. In order to be considered for publication in OBHDP a manuscript has to include the following: 1.Demonstrate an interesting behavioral/psychological phenomenon 2.Make a significant theoretical and empirical contribution to the existing literature 3.Identify and test the underlying psychological mechanism for the newly discovered behavioral/psychological phenomenon 4.Have practical implications in organizational context
期刊最新文献
Joining disconnected others reduces social identity threat in women brokers Retraction notice to “Don’t stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety” [Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 137C (2016) 71–85] The confrontation effect: When users engage more with ideology-inconsistent content online A Numeracy-Task interaction model of perceived differences On time or on thin ice: How deadline violations negatively affect perceived work quality and worker evaluations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1