Biocontrol of the Brown Cocoa Mirids Using Neem Oil and an Ethanolic Extract from Neem under Laboratory Conditions

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY African Entomology Pub Date : 2021-09-28 DOI:10.4001/003.029.0507
R. Mahob, D. Taliedje, H. Mahot, I. M. Ngah, S. E. Enama, C. Cilas, Y. G. F. Toguem, R. Hanna, C. B. Bilong
{"title":"Biocontrol of the Brown Cocoa Mirids Using Neem Oil and an Ethanolic Extract from Neem under Laboratory Conditions","authors":"R. Mahob, D. Taliedje, H. Mahot, I. M. Ngah, S. E. Enama, C. Cilas, Y. G. F. Toguem, R. Hanna, C. B. Bilong","doi":"10.4001/003.029.0507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The African mirid bug (Sahlbergella singularis) is the most economically important insect pest in cocoa farms. Pesticide management, although controversial due to the adverse effects of these substances on the environment and on human health, remains the main option used for controlling this pest. In the recent decades, the development of alternative approaches to synthetic pesticides is a requirement. Therefore, we used neem oil (NO) and ethanolic extracts (EE) from leaves at different concentrations to evaluate, in vitro, their insecticidal potentials against mirids. Mirid mortality increased significantly with increase in concentrations, values ranged from 32.5 to 92.5 % for EE and 52.5 to 97.5 % for NO. Apart from negative controls, Tween 80 and distilled water, that showed significant low mortality rates, both extracts revealed effectiveness comparable to the reference insecticide used in controlling mirids, except for EE by ingestion. Mirids treated by contact showed significantly high mortality rates (72.5 to 97.5 %) compared to those treated by ingestion (32.5 to 70.0 %). The greatest biological effectiveness values were obtained at a concentration of 8 % by contact exposure: 0.88 ml/ml (NO) and 0.73 g/ml (EE) for LC50 and ≈1 day to both extracts for LT50. Given effectiveness comparable to that of the insecticide, both tested extracts should be considered as effective biopesticides for IPM against mirids, especially S. singularis.","PeriodicalId":7566,"journal":{"name":"African Entomology","volume":"29 1","pages":"507 - 521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4001/003.029.0507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The African mirid bug (Sahlbergella singularis) is the most economically important insect pest in cocoa farms. Pesticide management, although controversial due to the adverse effects of these substances on the environment and on human health, remains the main option used for controlling this pest. In the recent decades, the development of alternative approaches to synthetic pesticides is a requirement. Therefore, we used neem oil (NO) and ethanolic extracts (EE) from leaves at different concentrations to evaluate, in vitro, their insecticidal potentials against mirids. Mirid mortality increased significantly with increase in concentrations, values ranged from 32.5 to 92.5 % for EE and 52.5 to 97.5 % for NO. Apart from negative controls, Tween 80 and distilled water, that showed significant low mortality rates, both extracts revealed effectiveness comparable to the reference insecticide used in controlling mirids, except for EE by ingestion. Mirids treated by contact showed significantly high mortality rates (72.5 to 97.5 %) compared to those treated by ingestion (32.5 to 70.0 %). The greatest biological effectiveness values were obtained at a concentration of 8 % by contact exposure: 0.88 ml/ml (NO) and 0.73 g/ml (EE) for LC50 and ≈1 day to both extracts for LT50. Given effectiveness comparable to that of the insecticide, both tested extracts should be considered as effective biopesticides for IPM against mirids, especially S. singularis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
室内条件下用印楝油和印楝乙醇提取物防治褐蚕茧
非洲mirid虫(Sahlbergella singularis)是可可农场中经济上最重要的害虫。农药管理尽管由于这些物质对环境和人类健康的不利影响而引起争议,但仍然是控制这种害虫的主要选择。近几十年来,开发合成农药的替代方法是一项要求。因此,我们使用不同浓度的印楝油(NO)和叶片乙醇提取物(EE)在体外评估其对mirids的杀虫潜力。Mirid的死亡率随着浓度的增加而显著增加,EE的值为32.5至92.5%,NO的值为52.5至97.5%。除了阴性对照、吐温80和蒸馏水显示出显著的低死亡率外,这两种提取物显示出与用于控制Mirid的参考杀虫剂相当的有效性,但摄入EE除外。与摄入的Mirids(32.5%至70.0%)相比,接触治疗的Mirids显示出显著高的死亡率(72.5%至97.5%)。通过接触暴露,在8%的浓度下获得了最大的生物有效性值:LC50为0.88 ml/ml(NO)和0.73 g/ml(EE),LT50为≈1天。考虑到与杀虫剂的有效性相当,两种测试提取物都应被视为有效的生物杀虫剂,可用于IPM防治mirids,尤其是S.singularis。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Entomology
African Entomology 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: African Entomology (ISSN 1021-3589 – print / 2224-8854 – online) replaced the old Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa in 1993. A single volume consisting of two issues (March and September) is published annually. The journal is indexed in all major abstracting journals African Entomology is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes original research articles and short communications on all aspects of entomology, with an emphasis on the advancement of entomology on the African continent.
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Southern African Moths and their Caterpillars Book Review: Southern African Moths and their Caterpillars Coexistence of Ammoxenus (Gnaphosidae) spider species on and between termitaria of Microhodotermes viator (Hodotermitidae) at a Karoo site Determining the efficacy of push-pull for management of Eldana saccharina (Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in sugarcane through on-farm field trials in KwaZulu-Natal. Chrysomya chloropyga (copper-tailed blowfly) larvae reared on abattoir waste as a protein source for broiler production: carcass traits, meat quality and sensory attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1