Commentary—Much ado About Something Else. Donald Trump, the US Stock Market, and the Public Interest Ethics of Social Media Communication

IF 3.1 3区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS International Journal of Business Communication Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1177/23294884231156903
Leonella Gori, Pier Luigi Sacco, E. Teti, Francesca Triveri
{"title":"Commentary—Much ado About Something Else. Donald Trump, the US Stock Market, and the Public Interest Ethics of Social Media Communication","authors":"Leonella Gori, Pier Luigi Sacco, E. Teti, Francesca Triveri","doi":"10.1177/23294884231156903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze Donald J. Trump’s Twitter activity over the last months of the 2016 presidential campaign, his period as President Elect, and his Presidential term until Fall 2019, shortly before the outbreak of the pandemic. Trump weaponized social networks as a communication tool to build influence on the financial market and the public opinion. We relate Trump’s communication on Twitter to the dynamics of the NASDAQ100 trend over the whole period of study as well as two subperiods, pre-presidential versus presidential. We find that Trump’s hyperactivity on Twitter is followed by a negative market trend, and that tweets covering politically, and economically sensitive topics seem to negatively impact the market, except for real economy-related tweets. Some topics positively received by the market in the pre-presidential phase (e.g., China) become anticipators of negative trading days during the presidential one. We also consider the emotional tone of Trump’s tweets and find an unexpected reversal of the communicative valence of the tweets as to their expected impact on the stock market. Positive sentiment tweets seem to be followed by negative market performance and, maybe more surprisingly, vice versa. It seems that, during the period of observation, the market has learnt to interpret the emotional tone of Trump’s tweets as instrumental to Trump’s political strategy. In particular, the market seems to have realized that negative sentiment in Trump’s communication was entirely functional to political consensus building and not meant to convey market-relevant information. This is at odds with the idea that presidential communication should reflect the public interest, and especially so when it has major implications for the economy. Trump’s use of social media during both his presidential campaign and term questions the principle that institutional responsibility in the digital realm implies treating the infosphere as a commons. We discuss the implications for the functioning of the stock market and the emerging public interest ethical issues related to the breakdown of such principle.","PeriodicalId":45593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business Communication","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business Communication","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884231156903","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We analyze Donald J. Trump’s Twitter activity over the last months of the 2016 presidential campaign, his period as President Elect, and his Presidential term until Fall 2019, shortly before the outbreak of the pandemic. Trump weaponized social networks as a communication tool to build influence on the financial market and the public opinion. We relate Trump’s communication on Twitter to the dynamics of the NASDAQ100 trend over the whole period of study as well as two subperiods, pre-presidential versus presidential. We find that Trump’s hyperactivity on Twitter is followed by a negative market trend, and that tweets covering politically, and economically sensitive topics seem to negatively impact the market, except for real economy-related tweets. Some topics positively received by the market in the pre-presidential phase (e.g., China) become anticipators of negative trading days during the presidential one. We also consider the emotional tone of Trump’s tweets and find an unexpected reversal of the communicative valence of the tweets as to their expected impact on the stock market. Positive sentiment tweets seem to be followed by negative market performance and, maybe more surprisingly, vice versa. It seems that, during the period of observation, the market has learnt to interpret the emotional tone of Trump’s tweets as instrumental to Trump’s political strategy. In particular, the market seems to have realized that negative sentiment in Trump’s communication was entirely functional to political consensus building and not meant to convey market-relevant information. This is at odds with the idea that presidential communication should reflect the public interest, and especially so when it has major implications for the economy. Trump’s use of social media during both his presidential campaign and term questions the principle that institutional responsibility in the digital realm implies treating the infosphere as a commons. We discuss the implications for the functioning of the stock market and the emerging public interest ethical issues related to the breakdown of such principle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评论——关于其他事情的许多争论。唐纳德·特朗普、美国股市与社交媒体传播的公共利益伦理
我们分析了唐纳德·J·特朗普在2016年总统竞选最后几个月的推特活动、他当选总统期间以及他直到2019年秋季的总统任期,也就是疫情爆发前不久。特朗普将社交网络武器化,作为对金融市场和公众舆论施加影响的沟通工具。我们将特朗普在推特上的沟通与整个研究期间以及总统前和总统任期这两个子时期NASDAQ100趋势的动态联系起来。我们发现,特朗普在推特上的过度活跃之后,市场出现了负面趋势,而涵盖政治和经济敏感话题的推文似乎对市场产生了负面影响,但与实体经济相关的推文除外。一些在总统大选前阶段受到市场积极欢迎的话题(如中国)成为总统大选期间负面交易日的预期对象。我们还考虑了特朗普推文的情感基调,并发现推文的沟通价值在其对股市的预期影响方面出现了意想不到的逆转。积极情绪推文之后似乎是消极的市场表现,也许更令人惊讶的是,反之亦然。在观察期间,市场似乎已经学会将特朗普推文的情绪基调解读为对特朗普的政治战略有帮助。特别是,市场似乎已经意识到,特朗普沟通中的负面情绪完全是为了建立政治共识,而不是为了传达与市场相关的信息。这与总统沟通应反映公众利益的观点不一致,尤其是当它对经济有重大影响时。特朗普在总统竞选和任期内对社交媒体的使用质疑了数字领域的机构责任意味着将信息领域视为公共领域的原则。我们讨论了对股票市场运作的影响,以及与这一原则崩溃相关的新出现的公共利益伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Business Communication (IJBC) publishes manuscripts that contribute to knowledge and theory of business communication as a distinct, multifaceted field approached through the administrative disciplines, the liberal arts, and the social sciences. Accordingly, IJBC seeks manuscripts that address all areas of business communication including but not limited to business composition/technical writing, information systems, international business communication, management communication, and organizational and corporate communication. In addition, IJBC welcomes submissions concerning the role of written, verbal, nonverbal and electronic communication in the creation, maintenance, and performance of profit and not for profit business.
期刊最新文献
Toward a Gender Equality at Work via Activism The Role of Transparent Internal Communication Leading by Example: Supervisor Downward Feedback Seeking, Power Distance, and the Implications for the Feedback Environment Positive Communication Practices for Enhancing Collaboration Quality Gratitude Expressions and Happiness at Work Motherhood at Work: Positive Communication and Maternity Leave Negotiations (Un)Bounded by Job Types
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1