A Comparative Study of FIGO 1988 Versus 2009 Staging for Endometrial Carcinoma

A. E. Tahaoglu, Sait Bakir, E. Erdogdu, C. Dane
{"title":"A Comparative Study of FIGO 1988 Versus 2009 Staging for Endometrial Carcinoma","authors":"A. E. Tahaoglu, Sait Bakir, E. Erdogdu, C. Dane","doi":"10.17795/IJCP-4986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of the newly revised “The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO), 2009” sytem and whether there was a difference in new system comparison to 1988 F˙IGO staging sytem for endometrial carcinoma. Methods: A total of 132 patients who underwent complete surgical staging for endometrial cancer were enrolled retrospectively. Those patients’ overall survival and disease free survival were compared with 1988 and 2009 staging system. Results: The five year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with 1988 FIGO stage 1 and 2 were 97% and 100%, respectively. In 2009 system,theOSratesfor1and2were97% and100%,respectively. Therewasnostatisticallysignificantdifferencesbetweenstage1and stage 2 for OS rates in 1988 and 2009 as well. Conclusions: Thenewly revisedsystem couldbe lesscomplex forunderstanding, but itdoes notdiscriminatesurvival ratesbetter, especially in earlier stages. A new staging system and uniform surgical staging could be discussed.","PeriodicalId":73510,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of cancer prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of cancer prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/IJCP-4986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of the newly revised “The international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO), 2009” sytem and whether there was a difference in new system comparison to 1988 F˙IGO staging sytem for endometrial carcinoma. Methods: A total of 132 patients who underwent complete surgical staging for endometrial cancer were enrolled retrospectively. Those patients’ overall survival and disease free survival were compared with 1988 and 2009 staging system. Results: The five year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with 1988 FIGO stage 1 and 2 were 97% and 100%, respectively. In 2009 system,theOSratesfor1and2were97% and100%,respectively. Therewasnostatisticallysignificantdifferencesbetweenstage1and stage 2 for OS rates in 1988 and 2009 as well. Conclusions: Thenewly revisedsystem couldbe lesscomplex forunderstanding, but itdoes notdiscriminatesurvival ratesbetter, especially in earlier stages. A new staging system and uniform surgical staging could be discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FIGO 1988与2009对子宫内膜癌分期的比较研究
目的:本研究的目的是调查新修订的“国际妇产科联合会(FIGO),2009”系统的益处,以及与1988年F*IGO子宫内膜癌分期系统相比,新系统是否存在差异。方法:回顾性分析132例癌症完全手术分期患者的临床资料。将这些患者的总生存率和无病生存率与1988年和2009年的分期系统进行比较。结果:1988年FIGO 1期和2期患者的五年总生存率分别为97%和100%。在2009年的系统中,1和2的OS比率分别为97%和100%。1988年和2009年的OS发生率在第1阶段和第2阶段之间也没有明显差异。结论:新修订的系统在理解方面可能不那么复杂,但它并没有更好地区分存活率,尤其是在早期阶段。可以讨论一种新的分期系统和统一的手术分期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Mutation in WT1 Gene Associated with Wilms Tumor with Reduced Penetrance in an Iranian Family Trends in the Incidence of Cancer in Iran (2003 - 2009) Efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Breast Cancer Female Patients’ Hope Bladder Cancer in Iran: Geographical Distribution and Risk Factors Positive Peritoneal Cytology as a Predictor of Prognosis in Early Stage of Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1