When and why people perform mindless math

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Judgment and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1017/s1930297500009396
M. A. Lawson, Richard P. Larrick, Jack B. Soll
{"title":"When and why people perform mindless math","authors":"M. A. Lawson, Richard P. Larrick, Jack B. Soll","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we show that the presence of numbers in a problem tempts\n people to perform mathematical operations even when the correct answer\n requires no math, which we term “mindless math”. In three pre-registered\n studies across two survey platforms (total N = 3,193), we investigate how\n mindless math relates to perceived problem difficulty, problem\n representation, and accuracy. In Study 1, we show that increasing the\n numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math (and fewer correct\n answers). Study 2 shows that this effect is not caused by people being wary\n of problems that seem too easy. In Study 3, we show that this effect is\n robust over a wider range of numeric demands, and in the discussion we offer\n two possible mechanisms that would explain this effect, and the caveat that\n at even harder levels of numeric demands the effect may invert such that\n much harder math increases accuracy relative\n to moderately hard math.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we show that the presence of numbers in a problem tempts people to perform mathematical operations even when the correct answer requires no math, which we term “mindless math”. In three pre-registered studies across two survey platforms (total N = 3,193), we investigate how mindless math relates to perceived problem difficulty, problem representation, and accuracy. In Study 1, we show that increasing the numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math (and fewer correct answers). Study 2 shows that this effect is not caused by people being wary of problems that seem too easy. In Study 3, we show that this effect is robust over a wider range of numeric demands, and in the discussion we offer two possible mechanisms that would explain this effect, and the caveat that at even harder levels of numeric demands the effect may invert such that much harder math increases accuracy relative to moderately hard math.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人们什么时候以及为什么进行无意识的数学运算
在本文中,我们证明了问题中数字的存在会诱使人们进行数学运算,即使正确答案不需要数学,我们称之为“无脑数学”。在两个调查平台(总N = 3,193)的三个预注册研究中,我们调查了无意识数学与感知问题难度、问题表征和准确性之间的关系。在研究1中,我们表明,增加问题的数字要求会导致更多的不需要大脑的数学(和更少的正确答案)。研究2表明,这种影响不是由人们对看似太容易的问题保持警惕造成的。在研究3中,我们表明这种效应在更广泛的数字需求范围内是稳健的,在讨论中,我们提供了两种可能的机制来解释这种效应,并警告说,在更困难的数字需求水平上,这种效应可能会反转,即相对于中等难度的数学,更困难的数学会提高准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Judgment and Decision Making
Judgment and Decision Making PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The benefits of deciding now and not later: The influence of the timing between acquiring knowledge and deciding on decision confidence, omission neglect bias, and choice deferral I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine The final step effect Choosing more aggressive commitment contracts for others than for the self Systematic metacognitive reflection helps people discover far-sighted decision strategies: A process-tracing experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1