{"title":"When and why people perform mindless math","authors":"M. A. Lawson, Richard P. Larrick, Jack B. Soll","doi":"10.1017/s1930297500009396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper, we show that the presence of numbers in a problem tempts\n people to perform mathematical operations even when the correct answer\n requires no math, which we term “mindless math”. In three pre-registered\n studies across two survey platforms (total N = 3,193), we investigate how\n mindless math relates to perceived problem difficulty, problem\n representation, and accuracy. In Study 1, we show that increasing the\n numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math (and fewer correct\n answers). Study 2 shows that this effect is not caused by people being wary\n of problems that seem too easy. In Study 3, we show that this effect is\n robust over a wider range of numeric demands, and in the discussion we offer\n two possible mechanisms that would explain this effect, and the caveat that\n at even harder levels of numeric demands the effect may invert such that\n much harder math increases accuracy relative\n to moderately hard math.","PeriodicalId":48045,"journal":{"name":"Judgment and Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judgment and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500009396","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper, we show that the presence of numbers in a problem tempts
people to perform mathematical operations even when the correct answer
requires no math, which we term “mindless math”. In three pre-registered
studies across two survey platforms (total N = 3,193), we investigate how
mindless math relates to perceived problem difficulty, problem
representation, and accuracy. In Study 1, we show that increasing the
numeric demands of problems leads to more mindless math (and fewer correct
answers). Study 2 shows that this effect is not caused by people being wary
of problems that seem too easy. In Study 3, we show that this effect is
robust over a wider range of numeric demands, and in the discussion we offer
two possible mechanisms that would explain this effect, and the caveat that
at even harder levels of numeric demands the effect may invert such that
much harder math increases accuracy relative
to moderately hard math.