Crimean Tatars in explorative and travel writing: 1782–1802

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Anatolian Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-17 DOI:10.1017/S0066154617000060
Beatrice Teissier
{"title":"Crimean Tatars in explorative and travel writing: 1782–1802","authors":"Beatrice Teissier","doi":"10.1017/S0066154617000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article discusses the portrayal of Crimea, particularly Crimean Tatars and their culture, through the writings of nine men and women who travelled in the region in the late 18th century. These writers travelled in different capacities and represent a diversity of viewpoints; they include figures of the Russian academic and political establishment and western European travellers, with or without Russian affiliations. The article sets their writings in the context of the imperial Russian rhetoric of conquest associated with the annexation of Crimea in 1783 and Catherine II's tour of the area four years later. This rhetoric remains relevant today through the marked persistence of certain historic tropes in contemporary Russian attitudes towards Crimea. The article also discusses the writers’ responses to Crimea in the light of broader Enlightenment tropes in travel writing and ethnographic observation. It examines the extent to which the travellers’ accounts of Crimea were shaped by notions of ancient Greek heritage, Scythians and ‘Tartar hordes’, attitudes towards the Ottoman Empire (Crimea had previously been an Ottoman protectorate) and Islam, and 18th-century orientalism.","PeriodicalId":45130,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0066154617000060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0066154617000060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the portrayal of Crimea, particularly Crimean Tatars and their culture, through the writings of nine men and women who travelled in the region in the late 18th century. These writers travelled in different capacities and represent a diversity of viewpoints; they include figures of the Russian academic and political establishment and western European travellers, with or without Russian affiliations. The article sets their writings in the context of the imperial Russian rhetoric of conquest associated with the annexation of Crimea in 1783 and Catherine II's tour of the area four years later. This rhetoric remains relevant today through the marked persistence of certain historic tropes in contemporary Russian attitudes towards Crimea. The article also discusses the writers’ responses to Crimea in the light of broader Enlightenment tropes in travel writing and ethnographic observation. It examines the extent to which the travellers’ accounts of Crimea were shaped by notions of ancient Greek heritage, Scythians and ‘Tartar hordes’, attitudes towards the Ottoman Empire (Crimea had previously been an Ottoman protectorate) and Islam, and 18th-century orientalism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克里米亚鞑靼人的探险和旅行写作:1782-1802
本文通过18世纪晚期在该地区旅行的九名男女的作品,讨论了克里米亚的写照,特别是克里米亚鞑靼人及其文化。这些作家以不同的身份旅行,代表了不同的观点;其中包括俄罗斯学术界和政界人士,以及与俄罗斯有或没有关系的西欧旅行家。这篇文章将他们的作品置于俄罗斯帝国在1783年吞并克里米亚以及四年后叶卡捷琳娜二世访问该地区时的征服言论的背景下。通过当代俄罗斯对克里米亚的态度中明显持续存在的某些历史比喻,这种言论今天仍然具有相关性。文章还从旅行写作和民族志观察中更广泛的启蒙比喻的角度讨论了作家对克里米亚的反应。它考察了旅行者对克里米亚的描述在多大程度上受到古希腊遗产、斯基泰人和“鞑靼部落”的观念、对奥斯曼帝国(克里米亚以前是奥斯曼帝国的保护国)和伊斯兰教的态度以及18世纪东方主义的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatolian Studies
Anatolian Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Anatolian Studies contains articles focused on Turkey and the Black Sea littoral in all academic disciplines within the arts, humanities, social sciences and environmental sciences as related to human occupation and history. Articles are in English and are accessible to a wide academic readership. Anatolian Studies is a refereed journal.
期刊最新文献
Female bodies and dynastic legitimacy in the Nereid Monument at Xanthos The Byzantine cave monastery of the Ilgarini mağarası (Paphlagonia) – the Chryse Petra of Nikon Metanoite? A new look at an ancient city: An outline of the chronological and urban development of the Hittite capital Ḫattuša Coinage networks in fifth-century BCE Ionia Interpreting the subterranean building (the crypt) in the northern courtyard of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1