Belief and pluralistic ignorance

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Filosofia Unisinos Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.4013/fsu.2020.213.03
Marco Antonio Joven Romero
{"title":"Belief and pluralistic ignorance","authors":"Marco Antonio Joven Romero","doi":"10.4013/fsu.2020.213.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pluralistic ignorance is usually analyzed in terms of social norms. Recently, Bjerring, Hansen and Pedersen (2014) describe and define this phenomenon in terms of beliefs, actions and evidence. Here I apply a basic epistemic approach to belief – believers consider their beliefs to be true –, a basic pragmatic approach to belief – beliefs are useful for believers – and a mixed epistemic-pragmatic approach – believers consider their believes to be true and such considerations are useful – to pluralistic ignorance phenomena. For that, I take the definition given by Bjerring  et al.  (2014). Keywords:  Truth, pragmatism, epistemic belief, pragmatic belief.","PeriodicalId":41989,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Unisinos","volume":"21 1","pages":"260-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Unisinos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2020.213.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pluralistic ignorance is usually analyzed in terms of social norms. Recently, Bjerring, Hansen and Pedersen (2014) describe and define this phenomenon in terms of beliefs, actions and evidence. Here I apply a basic epistemic approach to belief – believers consider their beliefs to be true –, a basic pragmatic approach to belief – beliefs are useful for believers – and a mixed epistemic-pragmatic approach – believers consider their believes to be true and such considerations are useful – to pluralistic ignorance phenomena. For that, I take the definition given by Bjerring  et al.  (2014). Keywords:  Truth, pragmatism, epistemic belief, pragmatic belief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰与多元无知
多元无知通常是从社会规范的角度来分析的。最近,Bjerring、Hansen和Pedersen(2014)从信念、行动和证据的角度描述和定义了这一现象。在这里,我对信仰应用了一种基本的认识论方法——信徒认为他们的信仰是真实的——对信仰使用基本的语用方法——信仰对信徒有用——以及一种混合的认识-语用方法——信徒们认为他们的信仰是真实的,这些考虑是有用的——来解决多元无知现象。为此,我采用了Bjerring等人(2014)给出的定义。关键词:真理,实用主义,认识信念,实用主义信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Filosofia Unisinos
Filosofia Unisinos PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
O republicanismo neorromano na concepção de liberdade de J. S. Mill Preceitos e consequências da unificação de lógica e metafísica por Hegel: A desobediência civil como um direito de defesa em Rawls e uma tentativa de resposta à crítica de Raz Verdade e Justiça em Emmanuel Levinas Uma avaliação crítica da implausibilidade teórica do socioconstrutivismo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1