The category is: streaming queer television

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2023.2202597
Zoë Shacklock
{"title":"The category is: streaming queer television","authors":"Zoë Shacklock","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2023.2202597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Streaming television is often seen as a progressive space for queer representation, due to the wealth of queer people and stories found across its programmes. Yet for queer people to be seen on streaming television, they must first be made visible at the level of the interface, which determines which programmes are presented to users and in what ways. Through the organisation of the interface, streaming television acts as a discursive formation that creates knowledge about what it means to be queer. Borrowing from both Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Lynne Joyrich, I argue that streaming television constructs an epistemology of the category, in which queerness is presented as categorisable and predictable. I explore how the two key features of streaming television’s interfaces – categories and algorithms – produce an understanding of queerness as normatively visible and inseparable from consumer choice. Yet while streaming giants generate a neoliberal conception of normatively visible and consumable queerness, queer-specific streaming services such as Revry offer a different, ‘messier’ understanding of queer lives, suggesting that streaming television holds the potential for a more radical interface with queerness.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"316 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2023.2202597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Streaming television is often seen as a progressive space for queer representation, due to the wealth of queer people and stories found across its programmes. Yet for queer people to be seen on streaming television, they must first be made visible at the level of the interface, which determines which programmes are presented to users and in what ways. Through the organisation of the interface, streaming television acts as a discursive formation that creates knowledge about what it means to be queer. Borrowing from both Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Lynne Joyrich, I argue that streaming television constructs an epistemology of the category, in which queerness is presented as categorisable and predictable. I explore how the two key features of streaming television’s interfaces – categories and algorithms – produce an understanding of queerness as normatively visible and inseparable from consumer choice. Yet while streaming giants generate a neoliberal conception of normatively visible and consumable queerness, queer-specific streaming services such as Revry offer a different, ‘messier’ understanding of queer lives, suggesting that streaming television holds the potential for a more radical interface with queerness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类别是:流媒体酷儿电视
流媒体电视通常被视为酷儿表现的进步空间,因为它的节目中有大量的酷儿人物和故事。然而,要让酷儿人群出现在流媒体电视上,他们必须首先在界面层面上被看到,这决定了哪些节目以何种方式呈现给用户。通过界面的组织,流媒体电视作为一种话语形式,创造了关于酷儿意味着什么的知识。借用Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick和Lynne Joyrich的观点,我认为流媒体电视构建了一个范畴的认识论,其中酷儿被呈现为可分类和可预测的。我探讨了流媒体电视界面的两个关键特征——类别和算法——是如何产生一种对酷儿的理解,这种理解在规范上是可见的,与消费者的选择是不可分割的。然而,当流媒体巨头产生了一种新自由主义的概念,即规范可见和可消费的酷儿概念时,针对酷儿的流媒体服务,如Revry,提供了一种不同的、“更混乱的”对酷儿生活的理解,这表明流媒体电视有可能与酷儿有更激进的接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system Mediating the elemental: an immaterialist ethics for ecomaterialist media theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1