When Inmigration is a New Issue: Evidence from Chile 2003 and 2017

Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini, Patricio D. Navia, Renata Cirano, Francisca Jara Nancuente
{"title":"When Inmigration is a New Issue: Evidence from Chile 2003 and 2017","authors":"Gonzalo Espinoza Bianchini, Patricio D. Navia, Renata Cirano, Francisca Jara Nancuente","doi":"10.14201/rlop.27287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In countries where parties have not adopted strong policy positions on immigration–and where the immigrant population is not large–popular perceptions of immigrants might not reflect the ideological divides reported in the literature for countries where immigration is a politically salient issue. We assess the association of ideological identification with the perceptions of immigrants in Chile using two comparable national polls, one from 2003, before the recent immigration wave, and one from 2017, in the middle of an immigration wave, but before parties formally adopted policy positions on immigration. With OLS estimations, we find that, as expected, leftists had more positive views than the rest, but contrary to expectations, those on the right also had more positive views, especially in 2017. Views were more prominent in 2017 than in 2003, with those in the extreme left and extreme right displaying positive views.","PeriodicalId":52748,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinion Publica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana de Opinion Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/rlop.27287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In countries where parties have not adopted strong policy positions on immigration–and where the immigrant population is not large–popular perceptions of immigrants might not reflect the ideological divides reported in the literature for countries where immigration is a politically salient issue. We assess the association of ideological identification with the perceptions of immigrants in Chile using two comparable national polls, one from 2003, before the recent immigration wave, and one from 2017, in the middle of an immigration wave, but before parties formally adopted policy positions on immigration. With OLS estimations, we find that, as expected, leftists had more positive views than the rest, but contrary to expectations, those on the right also had more positive views, especially in 2017. Views were more prominent in 2017 than in 2003, with those in the extreme left and extreme right displaying positive views.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
何时移民是一个新问题:来自智利2003年和2017年的证据
在政党在移民问题上没有采取强硬政策立场的国家,以及移民人口不多的国家,公众对移民的看法可能不会反映出移民是一个政治突出问题的国家的文献中所报道的意识形态分歧。我们使用两次可比较的全国民意调查来评估意识形态认同与智利移民观念之间的关系,一次是在2003年,在最近的移民浪潮之前,另一次是在2017年,在移民浪潮中期,但在政党正式采取移民政策立场之前。根据OLS估计,我们发现,正如预期的那样,左派人士比其他人有更多的积极看法,但与预期相反,右派人士也有更多的积极看法,尤其是在2017年。与2003年相比,2017年的观点更为突出,极左和极右人士都持积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Peru: Deep Political Dissatisfaction Weakens Support for Democracy Andy Baker, Barry Ames, and Lúcio Rennó. Persuasive Peers: Social Communication and Voting in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. 369 pages. ISBN 9780691205786. Clientelist Mobilization and Political Participation Outside of the Electoral Arena The Power of Political Discussion: Uncovering the Influence of Networks on Vote Choice and its Mechanisms Does China’s Rise influence anti-Americanism? Evidence from Colombia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1