Listening Across the Ages: Measuring Generational Listening Differences with the LCI-R

Q1 Arts and Humanities International Journal of Listening Pub Date : 2020-04-06 DOI:10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503
E. Parks
{"title":"Listening Across the Ages: Measuring Generational Listening Differences with the LCI-R","authors":"E. Parks","doi":"10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, I consider ways that identification with diverse generational cultures might impact conceptualization of what it means to listen well. Using an online survey, I employ the Revised Listening Concepts Inventory (LCI-R) to explore listening cognitive constructs. Based on 433 survey responses gathered between 2016 and 2019 in the Pacific Northwest, Upper Midwest, and Rocky Mountain Range regions of the United States, I found differences between Generation Z and Generation X on learning, relationship building, and evaluative listening cognitive constructs, as well as differences on the evaluative listening cognitive construct between Generation Z and members of all other generations, including Millennial, Generation X, and Boomer cultural cohorts. Based on these initial findings, I suggest that listening scholars pursue future research with cross-generational listening expectations and listening practitioners be attentive to intergenerational differences that inflect our communicative values and behaviors.","PeriodicalId":35114,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Listening","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Listening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, I consider ways that identification with diverse generational cultures might impact conceptualization of what it means to listen well. Using an online survey, I employ the Revised Listening Concepts Inventory (LCI-R) to explore listening cognitive constructs. Based on 433 survey responses gathered between 2016 and 2019 in the Pacific Northwest, Upper Midwest, and Rocky Mountain Range regions of the United States, I found differences between Generation Z and Generation X on learning, relationship building, and evaluative listening cognitive constructs, as well as differences on the evaluative listening cognitive construct between Generation Z and members of all other generations, including Millennial, Generation X, and Boomer cultural cohorts. Based on these initial findings, I suggest that listening scholars pursue future research with cross-generational listening expectations and listening practitioners be attentive to intergenerational differences that inflect our communicative values and behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨年龄段的听力:用LCI-R测量代际听力差异
在本研究中,我考虑了对不同代际文化的认同可能会影响对倾听意义的概念化。通过在线调查,我使用了修订听力概念清单(LCI-R)来探索听力认知结构。根据2016年至2019年在美国太平洋西北地区、上中西部地区和落基山脉地区收集的433份调查回复,我发现Z一代和X一代在学习、建立关系和评估性听力认知结构方面存在差异,Z一代和其他所有世代(包括千禧一代、X一代和婴儿潮一代)在评估性听力认知结构方面存在差异。基于这些初步发现,我建议听力学者在未来的研究中考虑跨代的听力期望,而听力实践者应注意影响我们的交际价值观和行为的代际差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Listening
International Journal of Listening Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN INNATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL TRAITS AND THE ATTITUDES` ASSESSMENT TOWARD ACTIVE LISTENING AMONG EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATORS LISTENING TO BOOKS’ DURING THE PANDEMIC: EXAMINING THE USES AND GRATIFICATIONS OF AUDIOBOOK LISTENING RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS RHETORICAL LISTENING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: EXPLORING THE BLACK PETE DEBATE IN FLANDERS INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF RESPONSE FORMAT IN COMPUTER-BASED LECTURE COMPREHENSION TASKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1