“Making something new”: rethinking genre in the end times

Q3 Social Sciences Review of Communication Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/15358593.2022.2059392
Bailey Flynn
{"title":"“Making something new”: rethinking genre in the end times","authors":"Bailey Flynn","doi":"10.1080/15358593.2022.2059392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rhetorical Genre Studies has been a productive subfield of communication studies since the 1980s, with the conceptualization of “apocalyptic” as a genre being one influential outcome. Literature on the topic has explored apocalypse as a genre arising to make sense of destabilizing events that fit within no pre-existing symbolic framework. I join this conversation with a slight shift in focus, from the genre itself to the destabilization that occasions it and its potential for rhetorical invention. Picking up on Lauren Berlant’s theorization of the “genre flail,” I argue that the flail can be an ambivalent and productive rhetorical space where reparative and radical rhetorics may gain ground in addition to or beyond apocalyptic and violent alternatives. My case study in end times here is the global climate crisis as depicted in the 2018 film Annihilation. Through rhetorical analysis of the film’s mixed-genre style and ambivalent narrative, I define two possible readings of the film: as diagnostic and as social ecology. These dual readings demonstrate the creativity of genre flail, its potential as a rhetorical zone of innovation, and the importance of interrogating the destructive and reparative genres of practice it produces as potential ways of living-with environmental end times.","PeriodicalId":53587,"journal":{"name":"Review of Communication","volume":"22 1","pages":"143 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2059392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rhetorical Genre Studies has been a productive subfield of communication studies since the 1980s, with the conceptualization of “apocalyptic” as a genre being one influential outcome. Literature on the topic has explored apocalypse as a genre arising to make sense of destabilizing events that fit within no pre-existing symbolic framework. I join this conversation with a slight shift in focus, from the genre itself to the destabilization that occasions it and its potential for rhetorical invention. Picking up on Lauren Berlant’s theorization of the “genre flail,” I argue that the flail can be an ambivalent and productive rhetorical space where reparative and radical rhetorics may gain ground in addition to or beyond apocalyptic and violent alternatives. My case study in end times here is the global climate crisis as depicted in the 2018 film Annihilation. Through rhetorical analysis of the film’s mixed-genre style and ambivalent narrative, I define two possible readings of the film: as diagnostic and as social ecology. These dual readings demonstrate the creativity of genre flail, its potential as a rhetorical zone of innovation, and the importance of interrogating the destructive and reparative genres of practice it produces as potential ways of living-with environmental end times.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“创造新事物”:对末世流派的反思
摘要自20世纪80年代以来,修辞体裁研究一直是传播学研究的一个富有成效的分支领域,“启示录”作为一种体裁的概念化是一个有影响力的结果。关于这一主题的文学探索了启示录,将其作为一种类型,用来理解不符合预先存在的象征框架的不稳定事件。我加入这场对话时,焦点略有转移,从流派本身到引发它的不稳定及其修辞发明的潜力。借鉴劳伦·贝兰特对“类型连枷”的理论,我认为连枷可能是一个矛盾和富有成效的修辞空间,在这里,除了世界末日和暴力的替代品之外,修复性和激进的修辞可能会取得进展。我在这里的案例研究是2018年电影《湮灭》中描述的全球气候危机。通过对电影混合类型风格和矛盾叙事的修辞分析,我定义了电影的两种可能解读:诊断性解读和社会生态学解读。这些双重解读展示了类型连枷的创造力,它作为一个修辞创新区的潜力,以及质疑它所产生的破坏性和修复性实践类型作为与环境终结时代共存的潜在方式的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Communication
Review of Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Student-to-student confirmation: a review and recommendations for research Theorizing about persuasive message repetition in communication research: a systematic review Students’ peer network quality: effects on academic resilience and intention to persist Marginalizing mortality: the fight against death as the communicative cultural condition Assessing the communicative experience of student orientation leaders: peer and professional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1