State, Religion and COVID-19: can Religious Freedom be Guaranteed in Exceptional Circumstances?

Javier Martínez-Torrón
{"title":"State, Religion and COVID-19: can Religious Freedom be Guaranteed in Exceptional Circumstances?","authors":"Javier Martínez-Torrón","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/18818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. The coronavirus crisis: a tragedy and an opportunity - 2. Demanding governments’ accountability - 3. The conditions for legitimate restrictions on freedom of religion or belief - 4. The significance of equality and State’s neutrality for the protection of religious freedom - 5. Advantages of dialogue and cooperation between State and religion - 6. Support and doubts in the reaction of religious communities to governmental measures - 7. Final remarks.\nABASTRACT: This article explores peculiarities of the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to other health crisis experienced in the past. Each character is thoroughly examined in the article. The article focuses on four thematic areas: the legal regulation of the fight against coronavirus; the equality of treatment of religious freedom in relation to other fundamental rights; the cooperation between the State and religious communities; and the reactions of religious communities to governmental measures. The article argues that rather than raising new questions, COVD-19 has forced us to deal with familiar questions under unprecedented circumstances. In this frame, time has played a central role as a factor to be taken into account to scrutinize the legitimacy of measures introducing severe limitations to fundamental rights and freedoms. Finally, the article claims that from a legal perspective, the experience of the past months reveals that, especially in times of crisis, we need a scrupulous respect for the requirements of the rule of law, including a strict accountability and transparency from governments, and putting especial emphasis on the protection of fundamental rights, among which is freedom of religion or belief.","PeriodicalId":30314,"journal":{"name":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stato Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54103/1971-8543/18818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

TABLE OF CONTENTS: 1. The coronavirus crisis: a tragedy and an opportunity - 2. Demanding governments’ accountability - 3. The conditions for legitimate restrictions on freedom of religion or belief - 4. The significance of equality and State’s neutrality for the protection of religious freedom - 5. Advantages of dialogue and cooperation between State and religion - 6. Support and doubts in the reaction of religious communities to governmental measures - 7. Final remarks. ABASTRACT: This article explores peculiarities of the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to other health crisis experienced in the past. Each character is thoroughly examined in the article. The article focuses on four thematic areas: the legal regulation of the fight against coronavirus; the equality of treatment of religious freedom in relation to other fundamental rights; the cooperation between the State and religious communities; and the reactions of religious communities to governmental measures. The article argues that rather than raising new questions, COVD-19 has forced us to deal with familiar questions under unprecedented circumstances. In this frame, time has played a central role as a factor to be taken into account to scrutinize the legitimacy of measures introducing severe limitations to fundamental rights and freedoms. Finally, the article claims that from a legal perspective, the experience of the past months reveals that, especially in times of crisis, we need a scrupulous respect for the requirements of the rule of law, including a strict accountability and transparency from governments, and putting especial emphasis on the protection of fundamental rights, among which is freedom of religion or belief.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家、宗教与2019冠状病毒病:在特殊情况下宗教自由能得到保障吗?
目录:1;冠状病毒危机:悲剧与机遇——2。要求政府问责——3。3 .合法限制宗教或信仰自由的条件。平等和国家中立对保护宗教自由的意义- 4。国家与宗教对话与合作的优势——宗教界对政府措施反应的支持与质疑- 7。最后的评论。摘要:本文探讨了新冠肺炎大流行与以往其他卫生危机的特点。这篇文章对每个人物都进行了详尽的研究。文章重点关注四个主题领域:抗击冠状病毒的法律规制;宗教自由与其他基本权利同等对待;国家与宗教界的合作;以及宗教团体对政府措施的反应。文章认为,新冠肺炎并没有提出新的问题,而是迫使我们在前所未有的情况下处理熟悉的问题。在这方面,时间发挥了中心作用,是审查严重限制基本权利和自由的措施的合法性时应考虑到的一个因素。最后,文章声称,从法律的角度来看,过去几个月的经验表明,特别是在危机时期,我们需要严格尊重法治的要求,包括政府严格的问责制和透明度,并特别强调保护基本权利,其中包括宗教或信仰自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lealtà istituzionale, fedeltà religiosa e integrità morale in democrazia La qualificazione giuridica dello Stato di Israele dal punto di vista della libertà religiosa La vigilanza sull’amministrazione economica della Curia Romana È possibile misurare i diritti delle minoranze di religione e convinzione? De Albanensium seu Græcorum peculiari cura habenda. La condizione religiosa dei fedeli italo-albanesi nella Calabria post-tridentina. Profili storico-giuridici
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1