Critiquing Ontario’s Childcare Policy Responses to the Inextricably Connected Needs of Mothers, Children, and Early Childhood Educators

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Childhood Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.18357/jcs463202119951
Brooke Richardson, Alana Powell, R. Langford
{"title":"Critiquing Ontario’s Childcare Policy Responses to the Inextricably Connected Needs of Mothers, Children, and Early Childhood Educators","authors":"Brooke Richardson, Alana Powell, R. Langford","doi":"10.18357/jcs463202119951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the chronically inadequate childcare infrastructure in Canada and across much of the world. Government responses have been many and varied within and between countries, provinces, municipalities, and local communities. Embracing a feminist ethics of care lens, this paper examines how the needs of mothers, children, and early childhood educators were recognized as interconnected (or not) in Ontario’s childcare policy discourse and action throughout the pandemic. Findings indicate that children were rarely discussed beyond being a “burden” to their parents (and therefore the economy) while children’s and early childhood educators’ childcare experiences and needs were largely absent in any policy discussion or action. The only group to receive widespread media and political attention were mothers, whose ongoing struggle to “balance” paid and unpaid (care) work became heightened and visible en masse throughout the pandemic. We offer overarching observations and recommendations for childcare policy stakeholders and actors as we look to build new possibilities for Canadian childcare beyond the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":42983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Childhood Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Childhood Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs463202119951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the chronically inadequate childcare infrastructure in Canada and across much of the world. Government responses have been many and varied within and between countries, provinces, municipalities, and local communities. Embracing a feminist ethics of care lens, this paper examines how the needs of mothers, children, and early childhood educators were recognized as interconnected (or not) in Ontario’s childcare policy discourse and action throughout the pandemic. Findings indicate that children were rarely discussed beyond being a “burden” to their parents (and therefore the economy) while children’s and early childhood educators’ childcare experiences and needs were largely absent in any policy discussion or action. The only group to receive widespread media and political attention were mothers, whose ongoing struggle to “balance” paid and unpaid (care) work became heightened and visible en masse throughout the pandemic. We offer overarching observations and recommendations for childcare policy stakeholders and actors as we look to build new possibilities for Canadian childcare beyond the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批评安大略省的儿童保育政策对母亲、儿童和幼儿教育工作者的不可分割的需求的回应
COVID-19大流行暴露了加拿大和世界大部分地区儿童保育基础设施长期不足的问题。在国家、省、市和地方社区内部和之间,政府的反应多种多样。本文采用女权主义关怀伦理的视角,研究了在整个大流行期间,安大略省的儿童保育政策话语和行动中,母亲、儿童和幼儿教育工作者的需求是如何被认为是相互关联的(或不相互关联的)。调查结果表明,除了儿童是父母(因此也是经济)的“负担”之外,很少有人讨论儿童问题,而在任何政策讨论或行动中,儿童和幼儿教育工作者的育儿经验和需求在很大程度上是缺席的。唯一受到媒体和政治广泛关注的群体是母亲,她们为“平衡”有偿和无偿(护理)工作而进行的持续斗争在疫情期间变得更加突出和明显。我们为儿童保育政策利益攸关方和行为者提供了总体观察和建议,因为我们希望在大流行之后为加拿大儿童保育创造新的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Childhood Studies
Journal of Childhood Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
20
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living Through a Pandemic with Birds Interrogating the Representation of Children in Images of Childhood Help Us Stay: A Message to Yukon’s Policy Makers Amplifying the Encounters of Young Black Children with Anti-Black Racism: An Exploration of Parents’ and Early Childhood Educators’ Perspectives on Early Learning and Child Care Environments Child Labour in Iran: Problems and Solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1