Compensation and consistency effects in proenvironmental behaviour: The moderating role of majority and minority support for proenvironmental values

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI:10.1177/1368430217733117
F. Lalot, J. Falomir-Pichastor, A. Quiamzade
{"title":"Compensation and consistency effects in proenvironmental behaviour: The moderating role of majority and minority support for proenvironmental values","authors":"F. Lalot, J. Falomir-Pichastor, A. Quiamzade","doi":"10.1177/1368430217733117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Western citizens perceive human behaviour as a significant cause of climate change and increasingly adopt proenvironmental behaviours. However, such positively connoted behaviours can either increase (consistency) or decrease (compensation) the probability that one acts in a similar way in the future. Drawing from social influence and social identity literatures, we propose that numerical support for proenvironmental values (majority vs. minority) moderates the effect of past behaviour on intention to adopt proenvironmental behaviour. Across three studies (N = 500), past behaviour, either measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Studies 2 and 3) interacted with numerical support, manipulated (Studies 1 and 2) or measured (Study 3), to predict proenvironmental intention and behaviour. Results showed that majority support results in balancing dynamics, whereas minority support results in a consistency effect. These findings highlight the importance of the normative context for proenvironmental behaviour adoption and offer leads for developing behaviour change strategies.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"21 1","pages":"403 - 421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1368430217733117","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217733117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Western citizens perceive human behaviour as a significant cause of climate change and increasingly adopt proenvironmental behaviours. However, such positively connoted behaviours can either increase (consistency) or decrease (compensation) the probability that one acts in a similar way in the future. Drawing from social influence and social identity literatures, we propose that numerical support for proenvironmental values (majority vs. minority) moderates the effect of past behaviour on intention to adopt proenvironmental behaviour. Across three studies (N = 500), past behaviour, either measured (Study 1) or manipulated (Studies 2 and 3) interacted with numerical support, manipulated (Studies 1 and 2) or measured (Study 3), to predict proenvironmental intention and behaviour. Results showed that majority support results in balancing dynamics, whereas minority support results in a consistency effect. These findings highlight the importance of the normative context for proenvironmental behaviour adoption and offer leads for developing behaviour change strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环保行为中的补偿和一致性效应:多数人和少数人对环保价值观的支持的调节作用
西方公民认为人类行为是气候变化的重要原因,并越来越多地采取环保行为。然而,这种积极的行为可以增加(一致性)或减少(补偿)一个人未来以类似方式行事的可能性。根据社会影响和社会认同文献,我们提出,对环保价值观的数字支持(多数人与少数人)会调节过去行为对采用环保行为意图的影响。在三项研究中(N=500),过去的行为,无论是测量的(研究1)还是操纵的(研究2和3),都与数字支持相互作用,操纵的(实验1和2)或测量的(实验3),以预测亲环境的意图和行为。结果表明,多数人的支持导致了动态平衡,而少数人的支持则导致了一致性效应。这些发现强调了规范环境对采取环保行为的重要性,并为制定行为改变战略提供了线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Group Processes & Intergroup Relations is a scientific social psychology journal dedicated to research on social psychological processes within and between groups. It provides a forum for and is aimed at researchers and students in social psychology and related disciples (e.g., organizational and management sciences, political science, sociology, language and communication, cross cultural psychology, international relations) that have a scientific interest in the social psychology of human groups. The journal has an extensive editorial team that includes many if not most of the leading scholars in social psychology of group processes and intergroup relations from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Friendship networks predict girls' STEM fit and interest through subjective belonging. Narrow prototypes of Asian subgroups in the United States: Implications for the Stop Asian Hate movement. The psychology of criminal authority: Introducing the Legitimacy of Secret Power Scale. An investigation of how gender shapes the appearance and judgment of apologetic faces. Examining the impact of learning about a resolved conflict on attitudes in an ongoing conflict: Evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1