Understanding approaches to continence care for people living with dementia in acute hospital settings: an ethnographic study

Katie Featherstone, A. Northcott, P. Boddington, D. Edwards, S. Vougioukalou, S. Bale, K. Harrison Dening, K. Logan, R. Tope, D. Kelly, Aled Jones, Jackie Askey, Jane Harden
{"title":"Understanding approaches to continence care for people living with dementia in acute hospital settings: an ethnographic study","authors":"Katie Featherstone, A. Northcott, P. Boddington, D. Edwards, S. Vougioukalou, S. Bale, K. Harrison Dening, K. Logan, R. Tope, D. Kelly, Aled Jones, Jackie Askey, Jane Harden","doi":"10.3310/quvv2680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The acute hospital setting has become a key site of care for people living with dementia. People living with dementia are one of the largest populations in our hospitals, with the Department of Health and Social Care recognising that 25–50% of all acute hospital admissions are people who are also living with dementia. However, people living with dementia are a highly vulnerable group in the hospital setting and, following an acute admission, their functional abilities can deteriorate quickly and significantly. Detailed research is required to explore what constitutes ‘good care’.\n \n \n \n This study’s focus was a common, but poorly understood, aspect of everyday care for people living with dementia during an acute admission, that is continence care. We asked the following questions: what caring practices are observable when interacting with this patient group? How do ward teams respond to and manage continence needs? What informs these approaches? What are staff doing and why?\n \n \n \n This ethnography was informed by the symbolic interactionist research tradition, focusing on understanding how action and meaning are constructed within a setting. In-depth evidence-based analysis of everyday care enabled us to examine how ward staff responded to the continence care needs of people living with dementia and to follow the consequences of their actions. We carried out a mixed-methods systematic narrative review to refine our approach to fieldwork and analysis.\n \n \n \n This ethnography was carried out for 180 days, across 12 months, in six wards in three hospitals across England and Wales that were purposefully selected to represent a range of hospital types, geographies and socioeconomic catchments.\n \n \n \n In addition to general observations, 108 individuals participated directly in this study, contributing to 562 ethnographic interviews. Ten detailed case studies were also undertaken with people living with dementia.\n \n \n \n This study identified ‘pad cultures’ as an embedded practice on these acute wards. The routine use of continence pads among people living with dementia (regardless of continence and independence) was widespread. The use of continence pads was viewed as a precautionary strategy, the rationale being to provide safeguards, ensure containment and prevent ‘accidents’ or incontinence episodes, with an expectation that patients living with dementia not only will wear pads, but will use them.\n \n \n \n These ‘pad cultures’ enabled the number of unscheduled interruptions to the institutionally mandated timetabled work of these wards to be reduced, but had significant impacts on people living with dementia and, in turn, wider consequences for these individuals and their identities. Ward staff described feeling abandoned with the responsibility of caring for large numbers of people living with dementia, believing that it was impossible to work in other ways to support their patient’s continence.\n \n \n \n The limitations identified included the potential for the Hawthorne effect to influence data collection.\n \n \n \n In collaboration with a specialist dementia care and continence teams, the findings are informing the development of education and training at the interactional and organisational level.\n \n \n \n This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018119495.\n \n \n \n This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 10, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\n","PeriodicalId":73204,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/quvv2680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The acute hospital setting has become a key site of care for people living with dementia. People living with dementia are one of the largest populations in our hospitals, with the Department of Health and Social Care recognising that 25–50% of all acute hospital admissions are people who are also living with dementia. However, people living with dementia are a highly vulnerable group in the hospital setting and, following an acute admission, their functional abilities can deteriorate quickly and significantly. Detailed research is required to explore what constitutes ‘good care’. This study’s focus was a common, but poorly understood, aspect of everyday care for people living with dementia during an acute admission, that is continence care. We asked the following questions: what caring practices are observable when interacting with this patient group? How do ward teams respond to and manage continence needs? What informs these approaches? What are staff doing and why? This ethnography was informed by the symbolic interactionist research tradition, focusing on understanding how action and meaning are constructed within a setting. In-depth evidence-based analysis of everyday care enabled us to examine how ward staff responded to the continence care needs of people living with dementia and to follow the consequences of their actions. We carried out a mixed-methods systematic narrative review to refine our approach to fieldwork and analysis. This ethnography was carried out for 180 days, across 12 months, in six wards in three hospitals across England and Wales that were purposefully selected to represent a range of hospital types, geographies and socioeconomic catchments. In addition to general observations, 108 individuals participated directly in this study, contributing to 562 ethnographic interviews. Ten detailed case studies were also undertaken with people living with dementia. This study identified ‘pad cultures’ as an embedded practice on these acute wards. The routine use of continence pads among people living with dementia (regardless of continence and independence) was widespread. The use of continence pads was viewed as a precautionary strategy, the rationale being to provide safeguards, ensure containment and prevent ‘accidents’ or incontinence episodes, with an expectation that patients living with dementia not only will wear pads, but will use them. These ‘pad cultures’ enabled the number of unscheduled interruptions to the institutionally mandated timetabled work of these wards to be reduced, but had significant impacts on people living with dementia and, in turn, wider consequences for these individuals and their identities. Ward staff described feeling abandoned with the responsibility of caring for large numbers of people living with dementia, believing that it was impossible to work in other ways to support their patient’s continence. The limitations identified included the potential for the Hawthorne effect to influence data collection. In collaboration with a specialist dementia care and continence teams, the findings are informing the development of education and training at the interactional and organisational level. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018119495. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 10, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解急性医院环境中痴呆症患者的失禁护理方法:一项民族志研究
急性医院环境已成为痴呆症患者的关键护理场所。痴呆症患者是我们医院中人数最多的人群之一,卫生和社会护理部认识到,在所有急性入院患者中,25-50%也是痴呆症患者。然而,痴呆症患者在医院环境中是一个高度脆弱的群体,在急性入院后,他们的功能能力可能会迅速显著恶化。需要进行详细的研究来探索什么是“良好护理”。这项研究的重点是痴呆症患者急性入院期间日常护理的一个常见但鲜为人知的方面,即失禁护理。我们提出了以下问题:在与患者群体互动时,可以观察到哪些护理实践?病房团队如何应对和管理失禁需求?这些方法的依据是什么?员工在做什么?为什么?这本民族志受到象征互动主义研究传统的启发,专注于理解动作和意义是如何在一个环境中构建的。对日常护理的深入循证分析使我们能够检查病房工作人员如何应对痴呆症患者的失禁护理需求,并跟踪他们的行为后果。我们进行了一次混合方法的系统叙述回顾,以完善我们的实地调查和分析方法。这项民族志在英格兰和威尔士三家医院的六个病房进行了为期180天、历时12个月的研究,这些医院被有意选择来代表一系列医院类型、地理位置和社会经济流域。除了一般观察外,108人直接参与了这项研究,参与了562次民族志访谈。还对痴呆症患者进行了10项详细的案例研究。这项研究将“垫培养”确定为这些急诊病房的一种嵌入式实践。痴呆症患者(无论失禁和独立性如何)普遍使用失禁垫。使用失禁垫被视为一种预防策略,其理由是提供保障,确保控制并防止“事故”或失禁发作,期望痴呆症患者不仅会戴上失禁垫,还会使用失禁垫。这些“垫文化”使这些病房的制度规定时间表工作的计划外中断次数得以减少,但对痴呆症患者产生了重大影响,进而对这些人及其身份产生了更广泛的影响。病房工作人员描述说,照顾大量痴呆症患者的责任让他们感到被抛弃了,他们认为不可能以其他方式来支持患者的自制力。确定的局限性包括霍索恩效应对数据收集的潜在影响。与痴呆症护理和失禁专家团队合作,这些发现为互动和组织层面的教育和培训发展提供了信息。本研究注册号为PROSPERO CRD42018119495。该项目由国家卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会护理提供研究计划资助,并将在《卫生与社会保健提供研究》上全文发表;第10卷第14期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review. Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study. Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation. Safer and more efficient vital signs monitoring protocols to identify the deteriorating patients in the general hospital ward: an observational study. Reducing health inequalities through general practice: a realist review and action framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1