Cytology and histology: Complementary diagnostic modalities during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

Norge Vergara MD, Roseann I. Wu MD, MPH, Stuti Shroff MD, PhD, Cindy M. McGrath MD
{"title":"Cytology and histology: Complementary diagnostic modalities during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition","authors":"Norge Vergara MD,&nbsp;Roseann I. Wu MD, MPH,&nbsp;Stuti Shroff MD, PhD,&nbsp;Cindy M. McGrath MD","doi":"10.1016/j.tgie.2017.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has become the preferred method of sampling accessible intraintestinal and extraintestinal abdominal masses<span>, as well as peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy. Despite the success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-FNA, there are settings in which </span></span>FNA<span><span> appears to underperform when compared to other techniques. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA, endoscopists have used small-gauge cutting and core needle biopsies<span> in conjunction with or as an alternative to FNA. This review, from the pathologists′ perspective, will cover these complementary techniques, including definitions, advantages, and limitations, as well as the role of rapid on-site evaluation. Our conclusions include that cytologic specimens, which use alcohol-based fixation during processing, appear preferable for molecular testing that relies on nucleic acid preservation, such as next-generation sequencing. However, core biopsy should be considered when </span></span>immunohistochemistry and tissue architectural details are required for diagnosis.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":43887,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tgie.2017.10.005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096288317300803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) has become the preferred method of sampling accessible intraintestinal and extraintestinal abdominal masses, as well as peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy. Despite the success of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-FNA, there are settings in which FNA appears to underperform when compared to other techniques. To overcome some of the limitations of FNA, endoscopists have used small-gauge cutting and core needle biopsies in conjunction with or as an alternative to FNA. This review, from the pathologists′ perspective, will cover these complementary techniques, including definitions, advantages, and limitations, as well as the role of rapid on-site evaluation. Our conclusions include that cytologic specimens, which use alcohol-based fixation during processing, appear preferable for molecular testing that relies on nucleic acid preservation, such as next-generation sequencing. However, core biopsy should be considered when immunohistochemistry and tissue architectural details are required for diagnosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细胞学和组织学:超声内镜引导下组织采集的互补诊断模式
超声引导下的内镜下细针穿刺(FNA)已成为可触及的肠内、肠外腹部肿块以及肠周围淋巴结病变的首选取样方法。尽管内窥镜超声引导下的FNA取得了成功,但与其他技术相比,FNA在某些情况下表现不佳。为了克服FNA的一些局限性,内窥镜医师将小尺寸切割和核心针活检与FNA结合使用或作为FNA的替代方法。这篇综述,从病理学家的角度,将涵盖这些互补的技术,包括定义,优点和局限性,以及快速现场评估的作用。我们的结论包括,在处理过程中使用酒精固定的细胞学标本,似乎更适合依赖于核酸保存的分子检测,如下一代测序。然而,当需要免疫组织化学和组织结构细节进行诊断时,应考虑核心活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is to provide a comprehensive, current overview of a clinical condition or surgical procedure in gastrointestinal endoscopy, combining the effectiveness of an atlas with the timeliness of a journal. Each issue places a vigorous emphasis on diagnosis, rationale for and against a procedure, actual technique, management, and prevention of complications. The journal features abundant illustrations, line drawings and color artwork to guide readers through even the most complicated procedure.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Optimizing flexible endoscope reprocessing Endoscope-associated infections: A brief summary of the current state and views toward the future Other considerations: Perspective and obligations of our societies and governmental organizations Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes: Scientific rationales and patient safety implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1