Narrating North Korean History through Socialist Bloc Archives: Opportunities and Pitfalls

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1215/07311613-9155167
J. Person
{"title":"Narrating North Korean History through Socialist Bloc Archives: Opportunities and Pitfalls","authors":"J. Person","doi":"10.1215/07311613-9155167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:While the secretive North Korean government restricts access to its archives, and reliable statistical data is hard to come by, scholars have access to many more sources on North Korean history than most people think. Among the available materials is the diplomatic record of North Korea’s former communist allies, which provides backdoor access into prevailing political, economic, and cultural conditions in the DPRK throughout the Cold War. These materials have shed rare light on flash points in modern Korean history, including the Korean War and incidents that transformed North Korea’s political and diplomatic behavior, for example the 1956 August Plenum of the Korean Workers’ Party. Yet, as this article argues, these materials are not without their shortcomings and come with a few caveats. Scholars should not treat what these materials report as empirical fact on the grounds of which one can write an authoritative history of the DPRK. Just as no responsible scholar of American foreign relations would utilize US records without questioning them for evidence of Orientalist thinking, scholars utilizing the Soviet bloc records should first interrogate the materials for subjective perceptions or racialized assumptions about North Korea’s political and cultural inferiority that influenced the diplomats who authored the documents.","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-9155167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:While the secretive North Korean government restricts access to its archives, and reliable statistical data is hard to come by, scholars have access to many more sources on North Korean history than most people think. Among the available materials is the diplomatic record of North Korea’s former communist allies, which provides backdoor access into prevailing political, economic, and cultural conditions in the DPRK throughout the Cold War. These materials have shed rare light on flash points in modern Korean history, including the Korean War and incidents that transformed North Korea’s political and diplomatic behavior, for example the 1956 August Plenum of the Korean Workers’ Party. Yet, as this article argues, these materials are not without their shortcomings and come with a few caveats. Scholars should not treat what these materials report as empirical fact on the grounds of which one can write an authoritative history of the DPRK. Just as no responsible scholar of American foreign relations would utilize US records without questioning them for evidence of Orientalist thinking, scholars utilizing the Soviet bloc records should first interrogate the materials for subjective perceptions or racialized assumptions about North Korea’s political and cultural inferiority that influenced the diplomats who authored the documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过社会主义集团档案叙述朝鲜历史:机遇与陷阱
摘要:虽然秘密的朝鲜政府限制访问其档案,而且很难获得可靠的统计数据,但学者们可以访问的朝鲜历史资料比大多数人想象的要多得多。现有材料包括朝鲜前共产主义盟友的外交记录,该记录为了解整个冷战期间朝鲜的政治、经济和文化状况提供了后门。这些材料罕见地揭示了朝鲜现代史上的闪光点,包括朝鲜战争和改变朝鲜政治和外交行为的事件,例如1956年8月朝鲜劳动党全体会议。然而,正如本文所说,这些材料并非没有缺点,并附带一些注意事项。学者们不应该把这些材料报道的内容视为一个经验事实,以此来撰写一部权威的朝鲜历史。正如任何一位负责任的美国外交关系学者都不会在不质疑美国记录作为东方主义思想证据的情况下利用美国记录一样,利用苏联集团记录的学者应该首先质疑这些材料对朝鲜政治和文化自卑的主观看法或种族化假设,这些看法或假设影响了撰写这些文件的外交官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note The Diary of 1636: The Second Manchu Invasion of Korea The South Korean Military Ideological Complex: Transcendent Nationalism in Military Moral Education Beyond Double Identity, beyond Periphery: Chinese Ethnic Korean Poetry as Borderland Literature The Checkpoint of History: Testimony and Intertextuality in the Documentary Literature of the Korean War, 1960s–1970s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1