Dutch Reformed support for Assisted Dying in the Netherlands 1969–2019: An Analysis of the Views of Parishioners, Pastors, Opinion Makers, and Official Reports of the Protestant Church in the Netherlands

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS Pub Date : 2021-08-16 DOI:10.5840/JSCE202161143
T. Boer, A. Groenewoud
{"title":"Dutch Reformed support for Assisted Dying in the Netherlands 1969–2019: An Analysis of the Views of Parishioners, Pastors, Opinion Makers, and Official Reports of the Protestant Church in the Netherlands","authors":"T. Boer, A. Groenewoud","doi":"10.5840/JSCE202161143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In the opinion of many, medical assistance in dying is advocated primarily by secular thinkers whereas Christians seem to be more skeptical. However, we conclude that Dutch euthanasia practice, the most liberal in the world, would not have been possible without the support of the Protestant Church in the Netherlands. We examine four sources that illustrate the nature and extent of that support: national surveys from 1970–2018, official church reports from 1972–2003, contributions to the public debate in the formative 1970s and 1980s made by protestant theologians and physicians, and a recent survey amongst Reformed pastors regarding their experiences with a parishioner's euthanasia request. In the form of seven characteristics of Dutch Calvinism we explore the reasons for this early advocacy and try to understand why this support seems to be fading since the turn of the century.","PeriodicalId":43321,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","volume":"41 1","pages":"125 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF CHRISTIAN ETHICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JSCE202161143","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT:In the opinion of many, medical assistance in dying is advocated primarily by secular thinkers whereas Christians seem to be more skeptical. However, we conclude that Dutch euthanasia practice, the most liberal in the world, would not have been possible without the support of the Protestant Church in the Netherlands. We examine four sources that illustrate the nature and extent of that support: national surveys from 1970–2018, official church reports from 1972–2003, contributions to the public debate in the formative 1970s and 1980s made by protestant theologians and physicians, and a recent survey amongst Reformed pastors regarding their experiences with a parishioner's euthanasia request. In the form of seven characteristics of Dutch Calvinism we explore the reasons for this early advocacy and try to understand why this support seems to be fading since the turn of the century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1969-2019年荷兰改革宗对协助死亡的支持:对荷兰教区居民、牧师、舆论制造者和新教教会官方报告观点的分析
摘要:在许多人看来,临终医疗救助主要是由世俗思想家倡导的,而基督徒似乎更持怀疑态度。然而,我们得出的结论是,如果没有荷兰新教的支持,世界上最自由的荷兰安乐死是不可能的。我们研究了四个来源来说明这种支持的性质和程度:1970年至2018年的全国调查,1972年至2003年的官方教会报告,新教神学家和医生对20世纪70年代和80年代形成性的公众辩论的贡献,以及最近在归正牧师中进行的一项关于他们对教区居民安乐死请求的经历的调查。在荷兰加尔文主义的七个特征的形式中,我们探讨了这种早期倡导的原因,并试图理解为什么自世纪之交以来,这种支持似乎正在消退。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The Business of War: Theological and Ethical Reflections on the Military-Industrial Complex ed. by James Mccarty, Matthew Tapie, and Justin Bronson Barringer (review) Longing for the Good Life: Virtue Ethics After Protestantism by Pieter Vos (review) Aquinas and the Market: Toward a Humane Economy by Mary L. Hirschfield (review) Navigating the Divide: Healing Practices and Collective Wellbeing in a Nairobi Clinic Liturgy, Virtue, and the Foundations of an Ecclesial Ethic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1