A Melting Pot

R. Tibshirani, T. Hastie
{"title":"A Melting Pot","authors":"R. Tibshirani, T. Hastie","doi":"10.1353/obs.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Leo Breiman's article \"Statistical Modeling: The two cultures\" was timely and provocative. He advocated for Statisticians to learn about and appreciate a different \"culture\": an algorithmic approach, as distinct from the familiar, stochastic, data modeling approach to Statistics. While we have appreciated and contributed to the algorithmic approach, we have always had a foot in both camps. Here we advocate for a \"melting pot\", arguing that both approaches have their virtues, sometimes on the same problem.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/obs.2021.0012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2021.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Leo Breiman's article "Statistical Modeling: The two cultures" was timely and provocative. He advocated for Statisticians to learn about and appreciate a different "culture": an algorithmic approach, as distinct from the familiar, stochastic, data modeling approach to Statistics. While we have appreciated and contributed to the algorithmic approach, we have always had a foot in both camps. Here we advocate for a "melting pot", arguing that both approaches have their virtues, sometimes on the same problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熔炉
摘要:Leo Breiman的文章“统计建模:两种文化”是及时和挑衅性的。他主张统计学家了解并欣赏一种不同的“文化”:一种算法方法,与人们熟悉的随机统计数据建模方法不同。虽然我们对算法方法表示赞赏并做出了贡献,但我们始终涉足这两个阵营。在这里,我们提倡“大熔炉”,认为这两种方法都有各自的优点,有时是在同一个问题上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1