Aubrey L. Florom-Smith , J. Karen Klingenberger , Cathy P. DiBiase
{"title":"Commercial space tourism: An integrative review of spaceflight participant psychological assessment and training","authors":"Aubrey L. Florom-Smith , J. Karen Klingenberger , Cathy P. DiBiase","doi":"10.1016/j.reach.2021.100043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Health issues typical of the expected commercial space tourism (CST) population are considered manageable, but less is known about the impact of psychological conditions on spaceflight participant (SFP) wellbeing and safety during spaceflight. Plans to detect and prepare SFP for potential effects of psychological conditions emerging during spaceflight are unknown and may be inadequate. The purpose of this integrative literature review was to identify CST operators’ plans for SFP psychological assessment and training. Forty-four (44) articles met inclusion criteria and were largely composed of grey and popular literature sourced online. Plans for SFP psychological assessment and training prior to CST were not found, although vague descriptions of training for specific CST opportunities and limited medical assessment information was located. An undisclosed or possibly non-existent psychological support approach will likely be insufficient to ensure SFP safety and optimal performance during emergencies. Instead, detailed and focused intentional screening of SFP should be completed by appropriate members of a transdisciplinary healthcare team at various phases of the spaceflight experience. Following assessment, collaborative decision making to develop training, interventions, and mitigation strategies in support of individual SFP psychological needs should occur before, during and after spaceflight. The strategies should align with standards of care and inform urgently-needed SFP research. Knowledge gained from future research will contribute to appropriate, effective SFP psychological assessments, intervention and training development, testing, and implementation, and overall management of SFP programs and strategy development aimed at optimizing the CST experience and goals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37501,"journal":{"name":"REACH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REACH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352309321000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Health issues typical of the expected commercial space tourism (CST) population are considered manageable, but less is known about the impact of psychological conditions on spaceflight participant (SFP) wellbeing and safety during spaceflight. Plans to detect and prepare SFP for potential effects of psychological conditions emerging during spaceflight are unknown and may be inadequate. The purpose of this integrative literature review was to identify CST operators’ plans for SFP psychological assessment and training. Forty-four (44) articles met inclusion criteria and were largely composed of grey and popular literature sourced online. Plans for SFP psychological assessment and training prior to CST were not found, although vague descriptions of training for specific CST opportunities and limited medical assessment information was located. An undisclosed or possibly non-existent psychological support approach will likely be insufficient to ensure SFP safety and optimal performance during emergencies. Instead, detailed and focused intentional screening of SFP should be completed by appropriate members of a transdisciplinary healthcare team at various phases of the spaceflight experience. Following assessment, collaborative decision making to develop training, interventions, and mitigation strategies in support of individual SFP psychological needs should occur before, during and after spaceflight. The strategies should align with standards of care and inform urgently-needed SFP research. Knowledge gained from future research will contribute to appropriate, effective SFP psychological assessments, intervention and training development, testing, and implementation, and overall management of SFP programs and strategy development aimed at optimizing the CST experience and goals.
期刊介绍:
The Official Human Space Exploration Review Journal of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) and the International Astronautical Federation (IAF) REACH – Reviews in Human Space Exploration is an international review journal that covers the entire field of human space exploration, including: -Human Space Exploration Mission Scenarios -Robotic Space Exploration Missions (Preparing or Supporting Human Missions) -Commercial Human Spaceflight -Space Habitation and Environmental Health -Space Physiology, Psychology, Medicine and Environmental Health -Space Radiation and Radiation Biology -Exo- and Astrobiology -Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) -Spin-off Applications from Human Spaceflight -Benefits from Space-Based Research for Health on Earth -Earth Observation for Agriculture, Climate Monitoring, Disaster Mitigation -Terrestrial Applications of Space Life Sciences Developments -Extreme Environments REACH aims to meet the needs of readers from academia, industry, and government by publishing comprehensive overviews of the science of human and robotic space exploration, life sciences research in space, and beneficial terrestrial applications that are derived from spaceflight. Special emphasis will be put on summarizing the most important recent developments and challenges in each of the covered fields, and on making published articles legible for a non-specialist audience. Authors can also submit non-solicited review articles. Please note that original research articles are not published in REACH. The Journal plans to publish four issues per year containing six to eight review articles each.