Comparisons of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short term memory (LSTM) network models for ionospheric anomalies detection: a study on Haiti (Mw = 7.0) earthquake

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1007/s40328-021-00371-3
Mohd Saqib, Erman Şentürk, Sanjeev Anand Sahu, Muhammad Arqim Adil
{"title":"Comparisons of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long short term memory (LSTM) network models for ionospheric anomalies detection: a study on Haiti (Mw = 7.0) earthquake","authors":"Mohd Saqib,&nbsp;Erman Şentürk,&nbsp;Sanjeev Anand Sahu,&nbsp;Muhammad Arqim Adil","doi":"10.1007/s40328-021-00371-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since ionospheric variability changes dramatically before the major earthquakes (EQ), the detection of ionospheric anomalies for EQ forecasting has been a hot topic for modern-day researchers for the last couple of decades. Therefore, there is a need to identify highly accurate, advance, and intelligent models to identify these anomalies. In the present study, we have discussed artificial intelligence techniques e.g. autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and long short-term memory (LSTM) network, to detect ionospheric anomalies using the total electron content (TEC) time series over the epicenter of Mw 7.0 Haiti EQ on January 12, 2010. We have considered 20 days of TEC data with a daily 2-h interval and trained the models with an accuracy of 1.28 and 0.07 TECU for ARIMA and LSTM, respectively. Both ARIMA and LSTM results showed that the negative anomalies are recorded 5 days before the EQ (January 7), while strong positive anomalies are recorded 1–2 days before the EQ (January 11–12) that are consistent with the findings of previous studies. Moreover, the quiet space weather conditions during the analyzed period indicate that the observed variations could be considered precursors to the impending Haiti EQ. Our analysis suggests that the performance of the LSTM model is more robust as compared to the ARIMA model in terms of detection of seismoionospheric anomalies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40328-021-00371-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Since ionospheric variability changes dramatically before the major earthquakes (EQ), the detection of ionospheric anomalies for EQ forecasting has been a hot topic for modern-day researchers for the last couple of decades. Therefore, there is a need to identify highly accurate, advance, and intelligent models to identify these anomalies. In the present study, we have discussed artificial intelligence techniques e.g. autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), and long short-term memory (LSTM) network, to detect ionospheric anomalies using the total electron content (TEC) time series over the epicenter of Mw 7.0 Haiti EQ on January 12, 2010. We have considered 20 days of TEC data with a daily 2-h interval and trained the models with an accuracy of 1.28 and 0.07 TECU for ARIMA and LSTM, respectively. Both ARIMA and LSTM results showed that the negative anomalies are recorded 5 days before the EQ (January 7), while strong positive anomalies are recorded 1–2 days before the EQ (January 11–12) that are consistent with the findings of previous studies. Moreover, the quiet space weather conditions during the analyzed period indicate that the observed variations could be considered precursors to the impending Haiti EQ. Our analysis suggests that the performance of the LSTM model is more robust as compared to the ARIMA model in terms of detection of seismoionospheric anomalies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和长短期记忆(LSTM)网络模式在电离层异常探测中的比较——以海地7.0级地震为例
由于电离层变率在大地震之前发生了巨大的变化,因此电离层异常的探测用于大地震预报已经成为近几十年来现代研究人员的一个热门话题。因此,需要识别高度准确、先进和智能的模型来识别这些异常。在本研究中,我们讨论了人工智能技术,如自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和长短期记忆(LSTM)网络,利用2010年1月12日7.0级海地EQ震中的总电子含量(TEC)时间序列检测电离层异常。我们考虑了20天的TEC数据,每天间隔2小时,并对ARIMA和LSTM分别以1.28和0.07 TECU的精度训练模型。ARIMA和LSTM结果均显示,负异常出现在EQ前5天(1月7日),而强正异常出现在EQ前1-2天(1月11-12日),与前人研究结果一致。此外,在分析期间的安静空间天气条件表明,观测到的变化可以被认为是即将到来的海地EQ的前兆。我们的分析表明,在检测地震电离层异常方面,LSTM模式的性能比ARIMA模式更稳健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Selection of a calibration system for relative gravimeters and testing of the processing using the example of the Zhetygen calibration baseline in Kazakhstan A forwarding spoofing detection algorithm for Beidou navigation satellite system vulnerability Machine learning assisted model based petrographic classification: a case study from Bokaro coal field Spatial and temporal analysis of daily terrestrial water storage anomalies in China Enhancing landslide inventory mapping through Multi-SAR image analysis: a comprehensive examination of current landslide zones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1