Predictive factor for successful retrograde ureteral stent insertion in obstructive uropathy due to advanced cervical cancer

B. Noegroho, A. Mustafa
{"title":"Predictive factor for successful retrograde ureteral stent insertion in obstructive uropathy due to advanced cervical cancer","authors":"B. Noegroho, A. Mustafa","doi":"10.4081/UIJ.2019.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cervical cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in women. Some of the patients came with kidney failure due to malignant ureteral obstruction. Retrograde ureteral stent insertion as palliative urinary diversion often performed on these patients, but it has high failure rate and often has to be converted to nephrostomy, giving the patient unnecessary burden due to failed procedure. In this study, we evaluate factors that may predict successful ureteral stenting in cervical cancer patients to avoid unnecessary burden to the patient. Data were collected from 2014-2017. We evaluate the clinical, ultrasound and laboratory findings before stent insertion of the patient with successful compared to failed insertion. Comparative study was done using independent T-test and Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Odds ratio (OR) were calculated using contingency table and P value calculated using Fisher exact test. There were 41 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer performed retrograde ureteral stenting. From 41 patients, 20 (48.7%) were successful and 21 (51.3%) failed. Low hydronephrosis grade (OR=85.8; P<0.0001), low stage (OR=6.0; P=0.0098), radiotherapy (OR=3.7; P=0.04) were strong predictor for successful stent insertion. In bilateral hydronephrosis, more daily urine output (OR=29.2; P=0.002) and normal creatinine level (OR=6.3; P=0.03) were strong predictors for successful retrograde stenting, while bladder infiltration was strong predictor for stent failure (OR=0.0684; P=0.0021). Low hydronephrosis grade, no bladder infiltration, normal creatinine level, more daily urine output, low clinical staging and radiotherapy are predictive factors to predict a successful ureteral stenting in cervical cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":35651,"journal":{"name":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4081/UIJ.2019.221","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynaecologia International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/UIJ.2019.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in women. Some of the patients came with kidney failure due to malignant ureteral obstruction. Retrograde ureteral stent insertion as palliative urinary diversion often performed on these patients, but it has high failure rate and often has to be converted to nephrostomy, giving the patient unnecessary burden due to failed procedure. In this study, we evaluate factors that may predict successful ureteral stenting in cervical cancer patients to avoid unnecessary burden to the patient. Data were collected from 2014-2017. We evaluate the clinical, ultrasound and laboratory findings before stent insertion of the patient with successful compared to failed insertion. Comparative study was done using independent T-test and Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric data. Odds ratio (OR) were calculated using contingency table and P value calculated using Fisher exact test. There were 41 patients diagnosed with cervical cancer performed retrograde ureteral stenting. From 41 patients, 20 (48.7%) were successful and 21 (51.3%) failed. Low hydronephrosis grade (OR=85.8; P<0.0001), low stage (OR=6.0; P=0.0098), radiotherapy (OR=3.7; P=0.04) were strong predictor for successful stent insertion. In bilateral hydronephrosis, more daily urine output (OR=29.2; P=0.002) and normal creatinine level (OR=6.3; P=0.03) were strong predictors for successful retrograde stenting, while bladder infiltration was strong predictor for stent failure (OR=0.0684; P=0.0021). Low hydronephrosis grade, no bladder infiltration, normal creatinine level, more daily urine output, low clinical staging and radiotherapy are predictive factors to predict a successful ureteral stenting in cervical cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期宫颈癌症梗阻性尿路病逆行输尿管支架置入成功的预测因素
癌症是癌症中第三常见的女性。部分患者因恶性输尿管梗阻导致肾功能衰竭。逆行输尿管支架置入术作为姑息性尿路改道术经常在这些患者身上进行,但失败率很高,经常不得不转为肾造口术,由于手术失败,给患者带来了不必要的负担。在这项研究中,我们评估了可能预测癌症患者成功进行输尿管支架植入的因素,以避免给患者带来不必要的负担。数据收集于2014-2017年。我们评估了患者在支架置入前的临床、超声和实验室检查结果,将成功置入与失败置入进行比较。采用独立T检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对非参数数据进行比较研究。比值比(OR)采用列联表计算,P值采用Fisher精确检验计算。有41例被诊断为宫颈癌症的患者进行了逆行输尿管支架植入术。41例患者中,20例(48.7%)成功,21例(51.3%)失败。低肾积水分级(OR=85.8;P<0.0001)、低分期(OR=6.0;P=0.0098)、放疗(OR=3.7;P=0.04)是支架置入成功的有力预测因素。在双侧肾积水中,更多的日尿量(OR=29.2;P=0.002)和正常的肌酸酐水平(OR=6.3;P=0.03)是逆行支架置入成功的有力预测因素,而膀胱浸润是支架置入失败的有力预测指标(OR=0.0684;P=0.0021),低临床分期和放疗是预测癌症患者输尿管支架植入成功的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urogynaecologia International Journal
Urogynaecologia International Journal Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Assessing frailty in urogynecology patients: a comparative analysis of the Edmonton frail scale and pelvic floor symptom severity Prevalent practices and changing trends in the management of vesicovaginal fistula: a cross-sectional study from a nationwide questionnaire-based survey of urologists from a developing country Residents’ experience and training in obstetric anal sphincter injury repair in the United States Impact of vaginal submucosal platelet-rich plasma combined with non-cross-linked hyaluronic acid injections on dyspareunia and sexual satisfaction in a Hodgkin lymphoma cancer survivor: a case report Urinary tract infections in the intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1