Is food system research guided by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?

IF 6.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101331
Olivier Dangles, Quentin Struelens
{"title":"Is food system research guided by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development?","authors":"Olivier Dangles,&nbsp;Quentin Struelens","doi":"10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>One of the top aims of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 ‘zero hunger’ is to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture”. While food system sustainability is a growing area of research, it remains unclear to what extent the SDG-2 targets are guiding the creation of new scientific knowledge and the publication of findings. To examine this, we assessed 97,392 publications published between 2017 and 2021 whose research results supposedly support the achievement of SDG 2. We found that the vast majority of articles had only a superficial engagement with SDG 2, suggesting a lack of interest by food system researchers in the 2030 </span>UN agenda and a widespread practice of ‘SDG-washing’. We argue that scientists working on food systems should take better account of the SDG-2 targets and indicators in their research to identify the conditions, incentives, and supporting institutions necessary for their successful implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":294,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101331"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343523000787","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the top aims of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 ‘zero hunger’ is to “end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture”. While food system sustainability is a growing area of research, it remains unclear to what extent the SDG-2 targets are guiding the creation of new scientific knowledge and the publication of findings. To examine this, we assessed 97,392 publications published between 2017 and 2021 whose research results supposedly support the achievement of SDG 2. We found that the vast majority of articles had only a superficial engagement with SDG 2, suggesting a lack of interest by food system researchers in the 2030 UN agenda and a widespread practice of ‘SDG-washing’. We argue that scientists working on food systems should take better account of the SDG-2 targets and indicators in their research to identify the conditions, incentives, and supporting institutions necessary for their successful implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粮食系统研究是否以《2030年可持续发展议程》为指导?
可持续发展目标2“零饥饿”的首要目标之一是“消除饥饿,实现粮食安全和改善营养,促进可持续农业”。虽然粮食系统可持续性是一个不断发展的研究领域,但目前尚不清楚可持续发展目标2的具体目标在多大程度上指导了新科学知识的创造和研究成果的发表。为了验证这一点,我们评估了2017年至2021年间发表的97392篇论文,这些论文的研究成果据称支持实现可持续发展目标2。我们发现,绝大多数文章仅对可持续发展目标2进行了肤浅的接触,这表明粮食系统研究人员对2030年联合国议程缺乏兴趣,并且普遍存在“洗涤可持续发展目标”的做法。我们认为,从事粮食系统研究的科学家应在研究中更好地考虑可持续发展目标2的具体目标和指标,以确定成功实施这些目标所需的条件、激励措施和支持机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (COSUST)" is a distinguished journal within Elsevier's esteemed scientific publishing portfolio, known for its dedication to high-quality, reproducible research. Launched in 2010, COSUST is a part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite, which is recognized for its editorial excellence and global impact. The journal specializes in peer-reviewed, concise, and timely short reviews that provide a synthesis of recent literature, emerging topics, innovations, and perspectives in the field of environmental sustainability.
期刊最新文献
The potential of social innovation to shift the limits to climate adaptation Greening container terminals through optimization: a systematic review on recent advances Advancing sustainable port development in the Western Indian Ocean region Adaptation constraints, limits and enabling conditions in small island developing states Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1