Scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash hair regrowth with continued ritlecitinib treatment among patients with alopecia areata without target efficacy response at Week 24: post hoc analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study

M. Senna, S. Forman, L. Bordone, P. de la Cueva Dobao, R. Wolk, S. Zwillich, Fan Zhang, Haytham Mohamed Ahmed, L. Takiya
{"title":"Scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash hair regrowth with continued ritlecitinib treatment among patients with alopecia areata without target efficacy response at Week 24: post hoc analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study","authors":"M. Senna, S. Forman, L. Bordone, P. de la Cueva Dobao, R. Wolk, S. Zwillich, Fan Zhang, Haytham Mohamed Ahmed, L. Takiya","doi":"10.25251/skin.7.supp.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This post hoc analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807) assessed response to ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, between Weeks 28-48 among patients with alopecia areata (AA) who did not meet target efficacy response criteria at Week 24. \nMethods: Patients aged ≥12 years with AA and ≥50% scalp hair loss received daily ritlecitinib 10 mg (included for dose ranging only), 30 or 50 mg (±4-week 200-mg daily loading dose), or placebo for 24 weeks. After Week 24, ritlecitinib groups continued their assigned doses and the placebo group switched to ritlecitinib 200/50 or 50 mg through Week 48. This analysis included patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 or 50 mg (±4-week 200-mg daily loading dose) who had not responded at Week 24, based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 (≤20% scalp without hair), SALT score ≤10, or eyebrow (EBA) or eyelash (ELA) assessment (normal or ≥2-grade improvement from baseline among patients with abnormal EBA or ELA score at baseline), and followed them through Week 48. \nResults: Of the patients in the ritlecitinib groups who did not meet SALT ≤20 response at Week 24, 5-8% had response at Week 28, with rates increasing to 22-34% at Week 48. A similar trend was observed for SALT ≤10 (6-12% and 20-25%), EBA (8-14% and 20-33%), and ELA (4-15% and 17-30%) at Weeks 28 and 48, respectively, for patients not achieving the respective response at Week 24. Ritlecitinib was well tolerated through Week 48. Most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and headache. \nConclusion: Patients with AA treated with ritlecitinib who don’t meet target efficacy response at Week 24 may achieve response at later time points with continued ritlecitinib treatment.","PeriodicalId":74803,"journal":{"name":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin (Milwood, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.7.supp.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This post hoc analysis of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807) assessed response to ritlecitinib, an oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, between Weeks 28-48 among patients with alopecia areata (AA) who did not meet target efficacy response criteria at Week 24. Methods: Patients aged ≥12 years with AA and ≥50% scalp hair loss received daily ritlecitinib 10 mg (included for dose ranging only), 30 or 50 mg (±4-week 200-mg daily loading dose), or placebo for 24 weeks. After Week 24, ritlecitinib groups continued their assigned doses and the placebo group switched to ritlecitinib 200/50 or 50 mg through Week 48. This analysis included patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 or 50 mg (±4-week 200-mg daily loading dose) who had not responded at Week 24, based on Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score ≤20 (≤20% scalp without hair), SALT score ≤10, or eyebrow (EBA) or eyelash (ELA) assessment (normal or ≥2-grade improvement from baseline among patients with abnormal EBA or ELA score at baseline), and followed them through Week 48. Results: Of the patients in the ritlecitinib groups who did not meet SALT ≤20 response at Week 24, 5-8% had response at Week 28, with rates increasing to 22-34% at Week 48. A similar trend was observed for SALT ≤10 (6-12% and 20-25%), EBA (8-14% and 20-33%), and ELA (4-15% and 17-30%) at Weeks 28 and 48, respectively, for patients not achieving the respective response at Week 24. Ritlecitinib was well tolerated through Week 48. Most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Conclusion: Patients with AA treated with ritlecitinib who don’t meet target efficacy response at Week 24 may achieve response at later time points with continued ritlecitinib treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在第24周无目标疗效反应的斑秃患者中,持续利来替尼治疗头皮、眉毛和睫毛毛发再生:ALLEGRO 2b/3期研究的事后分析
背景:这项对ALLEGRO 2b/3期研究(NCT03732807)的事后分析评估了在第28-48周期间,在第24周未达到目标疗效反应标准的斑秃(AA)患者对口服JAK3/TEC家族激酶抑制剂利替尼的反应。方法:年龄≥12岁的AA患者和头皮脱发≥50%的患者接受每日10 mg(仅包括剂量范围)、30或50 mg(±4周200 mg每日负荷剂量)或安慰剂治疗24周。第24周后,利替尼组继续其指定剂量,安慰剂组在第48周改用200/50或50 mg利替尼。该分析包括接受30或50 mg(±4周200 mg每日负荷剂量)利他西替尼治疗的患者,这些患者在第24周时没有反应,基于脱发严重程度工具(SALT)评分≤20(≤20%头皮无毛发)、SALT评分≤10或眉毛(EBA)或睫毛(ELA)评估(基线时EBA或ELA评分异常的患者比基线改善正常或≥2级),并跟踪他们到第48周。结果:在第24周未达到SALT≤20应答的利替西尼组患者中,5-8%在第28周有应答,在第48周,应答率增至22-34%。在第28周和第48周,SALT≤10(6-12%和20-25%)、EBA(8-14%和20-33%)和ELA(4-15%和17-30%)的趋势相似,而在第24周未达到相应反应的患者。利他西替尼在第48周的耐受性良好。最常见的不良事件是上呼吸道感染、鼻咽炎和头痛。结论:接受利替尼治疗的AA患者,如果在第24周没有达到目标疗效反应,则在以后的时间点继续接受利替替尼治疗可能会达到反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Age or Sex on Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1%/Adapalene 0.15% Gel in Participants with Moderate-to-Severe Acne Cryoglobulinemia Type I in Patient with History of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Unknown Significance: A Case Report A Suspected Case of Imported Yaws in New York Syphilis in HIV Positive Individuals and the Importance of a Skin Exam: A Case Report Beware of the “Blue Nevus”: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1