Contempt, Withdrawal and Equanimity in the Zhuangzi

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Emotion Review Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1177/17540739231183074
Karyn Lai
{"title":"Contempt, Withdrawal and Equanimity in the Zhuangzi","authors":"Karyn Lai","doi":"10.1177/17540739231183074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Zhuangzi, a 4th century BCE Daoist text, is sceptical about the political culture of its time. Those who debated conceptions of a good life were hostile to the views of others. They were intolerant and at times contemptuous of others who did not embody their values. In contrast to such negativity, the Zhuangzi promotes equanimity. The equanimity of the sagely person is grounded in a balance she maintains between engagement and withdrawal. Engaging critically, she problematises the lack of diversity in their options for a good life. By withdrawing, she refuses to be party to the squabbles that perpetuate intolerance. The paper aims to show how equanimity is possible, thereby articulating a new angle on emotions in the Zhuangzi.","PeriodicalId":48064,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"189 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739231183074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Zhuangzi, a 4th century BCE Daoist text, is sceptical about the political culture of its time. Those who debated conceptions of a good life were hostile to the views of others. They were intolerant and at times contemptuous of others who did not embody their values. In contrast to such negativity, the Zhuangzi promotes equanimity. The equanimity of the sagely person is grounded in a balance she maintains between engagement and withdrawal. Engaging critically, she problematises the lack of diversity in their options for a good life. By withdrawing, she refuses to be party to the squabbles that perpetuate intolerance. The paper aims to show how equanimity is possible, thereby articulating a new angle on emotions in the Zhuangzi.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《庄子》中的轻视、回避与平静
公元前4世纪的道家著作《庄子》对当时的政治文化持怀疑态度。那些争论美好生活概念的人对他人的观点怀有敌意。他们不宽容,有时蔑视那些没有体现他们价值观的人。与这种消极相反,《庄子》提倡平和。一个睿智的人的平静建立在她在投入和退出之间保持的平衡之上。她批判性地参与进来,对他们在美好生活的选择上缺乏多样性提出了质疑。通过退出,她拒绝成为导致不容忍现象长期存在的争吵的一方。本文旨在展示《庄子》中的“平和”是如何可能的,从而从一个新的角度来解读《庄子》的情感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emotion Review
Emotion Review PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Emotion Review is a fully peer reviewed scholarly journal. It adheres to a blinded peer review process in which the reviewer"s name is routinely withheld from the author unless the reviewer requests a preference for their identity to be revealed. All manuscripts are reviewed initially by the Editors and only those papers that meet the scientific and editorial standards of the journal, and fit within the aims and scope of the journal, will be sent for outside review. Emotion Review will focus on ideas about emotion, with "emotion" broadly defined. The Review will publish articles presenting new theories, offering conceptual analyses, reviewing the literature, and debating and critiquing conceptual issues.
期刊最新文献
Comment: A New Typology of Nostalgia: Its Promise and a Limitation Shame is Personal, Not Ontological Emotion in Nonverbal Communication: Comparing Animal and Human Vocalizations and Human Text Messages Arousal: Reports of Its Demise May Be Premature Affective Influences on the Intensity of Mental Effort: 25 Years of Programmatic Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1