Germany's Urban Frontiers: Nature and History on the Edge of the Nineteenth-Century City by Kristin Poling (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES German Studies Review Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.1353/gsr.2022.0031
Sandra Chaney
{"title":"Germany's Urban Frontiers: Nature and History on the Edge of the Nineteenth-Century City by Kristin Poling (review)","authors":"Sandra Chaney","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2022.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kristin Poling’s thoroughly researched study of modernizing nineteenth-century German cities explores how urban borders became sites for debating local histories, contemporary challenges, and plans for future growth. Adopting the notion of “frontier,” a term the author acknowledges is often associated with claims of American exceptionalism through westward conquest and settlement, Poling argues that Germans, too, came to see the shifting edges of their cities to be frontiers for expansion and opportunity. The book’s five chapters analyze the transformation of Leipzig, Oldenburg, Paderborn, Berlin, and Nuremberg, illustrating broad trends in nineteenth-century urbanization as well as local conditions making each city’s growth and modernization unique. Poling has mined local and state archives and an impressive array of contemporary periodicals to reconstruct discussions among urban dwellers, planners, and authorities as they dismantled fortifications on their peripheries and then used the space to chart their city’s future development. Poling emphasizes that urban inhabitants generally agreed that removing old fortifications was desired to make their communities modern. While walls, gates, and moats had defended German cities since medieval times and protected their right to self-govern, by the late 1700s these fortifications were militarily obsolete, expensive to maintain, and restrictive of growth. Between 1790 and 1815, when the Holy Roman Empire was replaced by a political system in which laws defined and defended borders rather than walls, some 350 German cities dismantled large sections of their fortifications. Poling’s illuminating case studies begin in the early 1800s when German cities removed remnant fortifications on their “urban frontiers,” debating whether to use the newly available space to increase commerce and transportation, address housing shortages, or provide access to nature. Paradoxically, Poling explains, removing fortifications also sparked interest in preserving at least parts of old walls, especially iconic gates, as reminders of distinct communal histories. By the 1890s, when William II sought to develop an official national culture, remnant walls became prized symbols of regional traditions that could be seen as forming a united heritage of the new German Empire. Poling helps readers appreciate the local conditions influencing how cities shaped their peripheries. Leipzig’s leaders and planners were most concerned with making their defortified urban edge seem open to commerce. As a result, they blurred the visible boundary between city and countryside, first by creating a promenade in English","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"375 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2022.0031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kristin Poling’s thoroughly researched study of modernizing nineteenth-century German cities explores how urban borders became sites for debating local histories, contemporary challenges, and plans for future growth. Adopting the notion of “frontier,” a term the author acknowledges is often associated with claims of American exceptionalism through westward conquest and settlement, Poling argues that Germans, too, came to see the shifting edges of their cities to be frontiers for expansion and opportunity. The book’s five chapters analyze the transformation of Leipzig, Oldenburg, Paderborn, Berlin, and Nuremberg, illustrating broad trends in nineteenth-century urbanization as well as local conditions making each city’s growth and modernization unique. Poling has mined local and state archives and an impressive array of contemporary periodicals to reconstruct discussions among urban dwellers, planners, and authorities as they dismantled fortifications on their peripheries and then used the space to chart their city’s future development. Poling emphasizes that urban inhabitants generally agreed that removing old fortifications was desired to make their communities modern. While walls, gates, and moats had defended German cities since medieval times and protected their right to self-govern, by the late 1700s these fortifications were militarily obsolete, expensive to maintain, and restrictive of growth. Between 1790 and 1815, when the Holy Roman Empire was replaced by a political system in which laws defined and defended borders rather than walls, some 350 German cities dismantled large sections of their fortifications. Poling’s illuminating case studies begin in the early 1800s when German cities removed remnant fortifications on their “urban frontiers,” debating whether to use the newly available space to increase commerce and transportation, address housing shortages, or provide access to nature. Paradoxically, Poling explains, removing fortifications also sparked interest in preserving at least parts of old walls, especially iconic gates, as reminders of distinct communal histories. By the 1890s, when William II sought to develop an official national culture, remnant walls became prized symbols of regional traditions that could be seen as forming a united heritage of the new German Empire. Poling helps readers appreciate the local conditions influencing how cities shaped their peripheries. Leipzig’s leaders and planners were most concerned with making their defortified urban edge seem open to commerce. As a result, they blurred the visible boundary between city and countryside, first by creating a promenade in English
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kristin Poling著《德国的城市前沿:19世纪城市边缘的自然与历史》(综述)
克里斯汀·波林对19世纪德国城市的现代化进行了深入的研究,探讨了城市边界如何成为辩论当地历史、当代挑战和未来发展计划的场所。波林采用了“边疆”的概念,作者承认这个术语经常与美国通过向西征服和定居而宣称的例外主义联系在一起。波林认为,德国人也开始把他们城市不断变化的边缘看作是扩张和机会的边界。本书的五个章节分析了莱比锡、奥尔登堡、帕德博恩、柏林和纽伦堡的转型,说明了19世纪城市化的大趋势以及使每个城市的发展和现代化独特的当地条件。Poling挖掘了当地和国家的档案,以及一系列令人印象深刻的当代期刊,重建了城市居民、规划者和当局之间的讨论,当时他们拆除了周边的防御工事,然后利用这个空间来规划城市的未来发展。波林强调,城市居民普遍认为,拆除旧的防御工事是使他们的社区现代化的愿望。虽然自中世纪以来,城墙、城门和护城河一直是德国城市的防御工事,保护着它们的自治权,但到18世纪末,这些防御工事在军事上已经过时,维护成本高昂,而且限制了经济增长。1790年至1815年间,神圣罗马帝国被一种由法律界定和保卫边界而非城墙的政治体系所取代,大约350个德国城市拆除了大部分防御工事。Poling的富有启发性的案例研究始于19世纪初,当时德国城市拆除了“城市边界”上的残余防御工事,争论是否要利用新的可用空间来增加商业和交通,解决住房短缺问题,还是提供接近自然的途径。波林解释说,矛盾的是,拆除防御工事也激发了人们对保留至少部分旧墙的兴趣,尤其是标志性的大门,作为不同社区历史的提醒。到19世纪90年代,当威廉二世试图发展一种官方的民族文化时,残垣断壁成为地区传统的珍贵象征,可以被视为新德意志帝国的统一遗产。Poling帮助读者了解影响城市如何塑造其周边的当地条件。莱比锡的领导人和规划者最关心的是使他们被破坏的城市边缘看起来对商业开放。因此,他们模糊了城市和乡村之间可见的界限,首先是用英语创建了一个长廊
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
期刊最新文献
Demokratisierung nach Auschwitz: Eine Geschichte der westdeutschen Sozialwissenschaften in der Nachkriegszeit by Fabian Link (review) Plants, Places, and Power: Toward Social and Ecological Justice in German Literature and Film by Maria Stehle (review) The Philology of Life: Walter Benjamin's Critical Program by Kevin McLaughlin (review) Vor hundert Jahren: Coudenhove-Kalergis Pan-Europa —der Traum von einer demokratischen Weltmacht als Friedensstifter Erasures and Eradications in Modern Viennese Art, Architecture and Design ed. by Megan Brandow-Faller and Laura Morowitz (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1