Technical and Morphological Signs of Limestone Processingat the Lower Palaeolithic Site Medzhybizh A

IF 0.3 4区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-03-12 DOI:10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.112
O. Naumenko, V. Stepanchuk
{"title":"Technical and Morphological Signs of Limestone Processingat the Lower Palaeolithic Site Medzhybizh A","authors":"O. Naumenko, V. Stepanchuk","doi":"10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The task of identifying and analyzing the signs of intentional processing non-siliceous raw materials became relevant in European Palaeolithic studies only in recent years with the discovery of numerous sites, where such materials were widely used. This led to the need for experimental work focused on the study of the physical principles of knapping of non-siliceous raw materials and on the identification of its flaking capabilities. This article deals with the above range of issues in connection with numerous findings of artefacts prepared on non-siliceous raw materials in the lower layers of Medzhybizh A. The number of limestone findings on the area of 1,0 m2 in these layers constitutes, on average, 150—200 pieces. An abnormally large number of lime stone items were recorded in the 3D square at the level of the 2nd horizon of the V layer. Here, on an area of about 0.25 m2, 477 pieces were found, among which 56 complete and segmented pebbles (different in shape and size of individual fragments of limestone with eroded surface), 106 flakes and segments of such pebbles, as well as 304 amorphous fragments. Part of the objects in each of these groups can be attributed to the artefacts with varying degrees of confidence: 23, 81 and 5, respectively. The large number of artefacts and probable artefacts on local lime stones identified in layers V and VI of Medzhybizh A makes the task of searching for the objective definition of artefact-diagnostic criteria and, in general, studying the general regularities of knapping of the given kind of rock very urgent. The presence of refits allows studying technical and morphological features of archaeological items made of limestone. In this article the refitting with the greatest number of elements (nine) is analyzed in detail. \nAt the same time a series of experiments was conducted on the processing of local limestones using various techniques, namely: anvil technique, bipolar on anvil technique, freehand. The raw materials base for experiments is consisted of objects without any signs of transformation found in the deposits containing artefacts of the V and VI layers, as well as pieces from the nearest exposed pebble conglomerate in the valley of the Vovk River at a distance of no more than 15 km from the site. \nExperiments on knapping local limestone have confirmed the splitting properties of the material. The ability of the local limestone to produce flakes with sharp edges will increase as the hardness and density of the material increases. Typically, flakes have sharp edges that are suitable for wood and bone processing. \nExperiments have shown that signs of intentional processing of lithic raw materials in freehand, bipolar on anvil and anvil techniques that are easily recognizable on siliceous rocks can also be used to identify anthropogenic modifications of limestone. However, since limestone has a relatively low level of isotropy, an anisotropic fracture, an uneven surface of negatives, insofar as these signs are less expressed. \nObservations during the experiments as well as analysis of flakes of the experimental series revealed a number of common mandatory signs typical for this rock type. A comparison of the technical and morphological analysis of experimental products and archaeological artefacts suggests the artefact nature of the limestone pebble refitting from the V layer of Medzhybizh A. It is most likely that the freehand technique was used to process the pebble, but some elements could be obtained by anvil technique. The probability of applying bipolar on anvil technology is minimal. \nIn general, the applied approach of combined use of experimental, technical-typological and technological-dynamic methods demonstrated significant informative possibilities in the study of materials of the Lower Palaeolithic.","PeriodicalId":46362,"journal":{"name":"ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"1 1","pages":"112-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1090","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/archaeologyua2020.01.112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The task of identifying and analyzing the signs of intentional processing non-siliceous raw materials became relevant in European Palaeolithic studies only in recent years with the discovery of numerous sites, where such materials were widely used. This led to the need for experimental work focused on the study of the physical principles of knapping of non-siliceous raw materials and on the identification of its flaking capabilities. This article deals with the above range of issues in connection with numerous findings of artefacts prepared on non-siliceous raw materials in the lower layers of Medzhybizh A. The number of limestone findings on the area of 1,0 m2 in these layers constitutes, on average, 150—200 pieces. An abnormally large number of lime stone items were recorded in the 3D square at the level of the 2nd horizon of the V layer. Here, on an area of about 0.25 m2, 477 pieces were found, among which 56 complete and segmented pebbles (different in shape and size of individual fragments of limestone with eroded surface), 106 flakes and segments of such pebbles, as well as 304 amorphous fragments. Part of the objects in each of these groups can be attributed to the artefacts with varying degrees of confidence: 23, 81 and 5, respectively. The large number of artefacts and probable artefacts on local lime stones identified in layers V and VI of Medzhybizh A makes the task of searching for the objective definition of artefact-diagnostic criteria and, in general, studying the general regularities of knapping of the given kind of rock very urgent. The presence of refits allows studying technical and morphological features of archaeological items made of limestone. In this article the refitting with the greatest number of elements (nine) is analyzed in detail. At the same time a series of experiments was conducted on the processing of local limestones using various techniques, namely: anvil technique, bipolar on anvil technique, freehand. The raw materials base for experiments is consisted of objects without any signs of transformation found in the deposits containing artefacts of the V and VI layers, as well as pieces from the nearest exposed pebble conglomerate in the valley of the Vovk River at a distance of no more than 15 km from the site. Experiments on knapping local limestone have confirmed the splitting properties of the material. The ability of the local limestone to produce flakes with sharp edges will increase as the hardness and density of the material increases. Typically, flakes have sharp edges that are suitable for wood and bone processing. Experiments have shown that signs of intentional processing of lithic raw materials in freehand, bipolar on anvil and anvil techniques that are easily recognizable on siliceous rocks can also be used to identify anthropogenic modifications of limestone. However, since limestone has a relatively low level of isotropy, an anisotropic fracture, an uneven surface of negatives, insofar as these signs are less expressed. Observations during the experiments as well as analysis of flakes of the experimental series revealed a number of common mandatory signs typical for this rock type. A comparison of the technical and morphological analysis of experimental products and archaeological artefacts suggests the artefact nature of the limestone pebble refitting from the V layer of Medzhybizh A. It is most likely that the freehand technique was used to process the pebble, but some elements could be obtained by anvil technique. The probability of applying bipolar on anvil technology is minimal. In general, the applied approach of combined use of experimental, technical-typological and technological-dynamic methods demonstrated significant informative possibilities in the study of materials of the Lower Palaeolithic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medzhybizh A旧石器时代晚期石灰岩加工的技术形态特征
识别和分析有意加工非硅质原材料的迹象的任务直到近年来才在欧洲旧石器时代的研究中变得相关,因为发现了许多此类材料被广泛使用的地点。这导致需要进行实验工作,重点是研究非硅质原料的物理原理和鉴定其剥落能力。本文讨论了上述一系列问题,这些问题与在Medzhybizh A下层的非硅质原材料上制备的大量人工制品有关。在这些层中1.0平方米面积上发现的石灰石数量平均为150-200件。在V层第二层水平的3D正方形中记录到异常大量的石灰石项目。在这里,在大约0.25m2的面积上,发现了477块卵石,其中56块完整且分段的卵石(具有侵蚀表面的石灰石碎片的形状和大小不同),106块此类卵石的薄片和分段,以及304块无定形碎片。这些组中的每一组中的部分物体都可以归因于具有不同置信度的人工制品:分别为23、81和5。在Medzhybizh A的第五层和第六层中发现的大量当地石灰石上的人工制品和可能的人工制品,使得寻找人工制品诊断标准的客观定义以及研究特定岩石破碎的一般规律的任务变得非常紧迫。复刻物的存在可以研究由石灰石制成的考古物品的技术和形态特征。在这篇文章中,详细分析了使用最多元素(九个)的改装。同时,采用砧座法、双极砧座法和徒手法对局部石灰石进行了一系列的加工实验。实验的原材料基础是在含有V层和VI层人工制品的矿床中发现的没有任何转变迹象的物体,以及距离现场不超过15公里的Vovk河流域最近的裸露卵石砾岩碎片。对当地石灰石的粉碎实验证实了这种材料的劈裂特性。随着材料硬度和密度的增加,当地石灰石产生具有锋利边缘的薄片的能力将增加。通常,薄片具有适合木材和骨骼加工的锋利边缘。实验表明,在硅质岩石上容易识别的徒手、双极砧座和砧座技术中有意加工石器原材料的迹象也可以用于识别石灰岩的人为变化。然而,由于石灰石的各向同性水平相对较低,各向异性断裂,底片表面不均匀,因此这些迹象很少表现出来。实验期间的观察以及对实验系列薄片的分析揭示了这种岩石类型的一些常见强制性标志。对实验产品和考古文物的技术和形态分析的比较表明,从Medzhybizh A的V层改装而来的石灰石卵石具有人工制品的性质。很可能是使用徒手技术来处理卵石,但一些元素可以通过砧座技术获得。在砧座上应用双极技术的可能性很小。总的来说,实验方法、技术类型学方法和技术动力学方法相结合的应用方法在旧石器时代晚期材料的研究中显示了重要的信息可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHAEOLOGY
ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Final Palaeolithic of Zhytomyr Polissia New Hypothesized Musical Instruments of the European Neolithic The Marble Bust of Mithras Tauroctone from Olbia Coins from the “Orient” Excavation Site of the Olbian Necropolis Finds of Lithospermum Nuts at Archaeological Sites in Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1