Are Sports Betting Markets Semi-Strong Efficient? Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sport Finance Pub Date : 2020-08-18 DOI:10.5167/UZH-189441
P. Meier, Raphael Flepp, E. Franck
{"title":"Are Sports Betting Markets Semi-Strong Efficient? Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"P. Meier, Raphael Flepp, E. Franck","doi":"10.5167/UZH-189441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether sports betting markets are semi-strong form efficient—i.e., whether new information is rapidly and completely incorporated into betting prices. We use news on ghost games in the top European football leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic as a clean arrival of new public information. Because spectators are absent during ghost games, the home advantage is reduced, and we test whether this information is fully reflected in betting prices. Our results show that bookmakers and betting exchanges systematically overestimated a home team’s winning probability during the first period of the ghost games, which suggests that betting markets are, at least temporally, not semi-strong form efficient. Examining different leagues, we find that our main results are driven by the German Bundesliga, which was the first league to resume operations. We exploit a betting strategy that yields a positive net payoff over more than one month.","PeriodicalId":45894,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-189441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper examines whether sports betting markets are semi-strong form efficient—i.e., whether new information is rapidly and completely incorporated into betting prices. We use news on ghost games in the top European football leagues due to the COVID-19 pandemic as a clean arrival of new public information. Because spectators are absent during ghost games, the home advantage is reduced, and we test whether this information is fully reflected in betting prices. Our results show that bookmakers and betting exchanges systematically overestimated a home team’s winning probability during the first period of the ghost games, which suggests that betting markets are, at least temporally, not semi-strong form efficient. Examining different leagues, we find that our main results are driven by the German Bundesliga, which was the first league to resume operations. We exploit a betting strategy that yields a positive net payoff over more than one month.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育博彩市场是半强有效的吗?新冠肺炎大流行的证据
本文考察了体育博彩市场是否是半强形式有效的,即新信息是否迅速、完全地纳入博彩价格。我们使用新冠肺炎大流行导致的欧洲顶级足球联赛幽灵比赛的新闻作为新公共信息的干净到来。由于幽灵游戏期间观众缺席,主场优势减少,我们测试这一信息是否完全反映在博彩价格中。我们的研究结果表明,博彩公司和博彩交易所系统性地高估了主队在幽灵游戏第一阶段的获胜概率,这表明博彩市场至少在时间上不是半强形式有效的。考察不同的联赛,我们发现我们的主要成绩是由德甲联赛推动的,这是第一个恢复运营的联赛。我们利用一种投注策略,在一个多月内产生正的净回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Sport Finance
International Journal of Sport Finance HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The Appraisal of Players’ Transfer Market Values: Empirical Evidence From Italian Serie A A Long Run Look at FBS Football Attendance Sports League Profit and Market Sizes Spectators or Influencers? The Crowd Effect Upon Winning in the NFL: A Natural Experiment The Appraisal of Players’ Transfer Market Values: Empirical Evidence From Italian Serie A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1