Assessing the Russian Troll Efforts to Sow Discord on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. Election

IF 4.4 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Human Communication Research Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1093/hcr/hqab009
Stephen A. Rains, Yotam Shmargad, Kevin Coe, K. Kenski, Steven Bethard
{"title":"Assessing the Russian Troll Efforts to Sow Discord on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. Election","authors":"Stephen A. Rains, Yotam Shmargad, Kevin Coe, K. Kenski, Steven Bethard","doi":"10.1093/hcr/hqab009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although experts agree that the Russian Internet Research Agency deployed trolls on Twitter to disrupt the 2016 U.S. presidential election, questions remain about the nuances of their efforts. We examined almost 350,000 original tweets made during the two-year electoral cycle to investigate the emphasis, timing, content, and partisanship of the trolls’ efforts targeting leading candidates. Despite only dedicating a fraction of their tweets to candidates, troll behavior generally tracked the relevance of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Ted Cruz during the election cycle. Trolls were significantly more likely to engage in name-calling in tweets about Trump, Clinton, and Cruz than in tweets about other topics. Name-calling peaked in tweets addressing Clinton during the general election. Right trolls were more likely to focus their attention on Trump, Clinton, and Cruz than were other partisan trolls.","PeriodicalId":51377,"journal":{"name":"Human Communication Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqab009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Although experts agree that the Russian Internet Research Agency deployed trolls on Twitter to disrupt the 2016 U.S. presidential election, questions remain about the nuances of their efforts. We examined almost 350,000 original tweets made during the two-year electoral cycle to investigate the emphasis, timing, content, and partisanship of the trolls’ efforts targeting leading candidates. Despite only dedicating a fraction of their tweets to candidates, troll behavior generally tracked the relevance of Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Ted Cruz during the election cycle. Trolls were significantly more likely to engage in name-calling in tweets about Trump, Clinton, and Cruz than in tweets about other topics. Name-calling peaked in tweets addressing Clinton during the general election. Right trolls were more likely to focus their attention on Trump, Clinton, and Cruz than were other partisan trolls.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估俄罗斯巨魔在2016年美国大选期间在推特上制造不和的努力
尽管专家们一致认为,俄罗斯互联网研究机构在推特上部署巨魔是为了扰乱2016年美国总统大选,但他们的努力的细微差别仍然存在疑问。我们检查了两年选举周期内发布的近35万条原始推文,以调查巨魔针对领先候选人的努力的重点、时间、内容和党派偏见。尽管他们的推文中只有一小部分是针对候选人的,但在选举周期中,巨魔行为通常会追踪唐纳德·特朗普、希拉里·克林顿、伯尼·桑德斯和特德·克鲁兹的相关性。巨魔在关于特朗普、克林顿和克鲁兹的推文中点名的可能性明显高于在关于其他话题的推文。在大选期间,对克林顿的谩骂在推特上达到了顶峰。与其他党派巨魔相比,右翼巨魔更有可能将注意力集中在特朗普、克林顿和克鲁兹身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Human Communication Research is one of the official journals of the prestigious International Communication Association and concentrates on presenting the best empirical work in the area of human communication. It is a top-ranked communication studies journal and one of the top ten journals in the field of human communication. Major topic areas for the journal include language and social interaction, nonverbal communication, interpersonal communication, organizational communication and new technologies, mass communication, health communication, intercultural communication, and developmental issues in communication.
期刊最新文献
Supportive communication as a collective phenomenon: a dynamic systems account of emotional support provision and outcomes in online health communities On the nature of influence: identifying and characterizing superdiffusers in seven countries Atoning vs. evading when caught transgressing: two multi-theory-based experiments investigating strategies for politicians responding to scandal A meta-analytical review of the relationship, antecedents, and consequences of information seeking and information scanning Getting socialized but trying not to get stuck: early career professionals’ liminality in dual socialization processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1