Poltsevskaya Cultures of Primorye in the Context of Ethnocultural Indicators

O. Dyakova
{"title":"Poltsevskaya Cultures of Primorye in the Context of Ethnocultural Indicators","authors":"O. Dyakova","doi":"10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2023.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spreading area of monuments of the Poltsevskaya culture of the Far East is extensive. In Russia, they are located across the territories of the Amur region and of Primorye, in China they spread throughout Manchuria. The time of the functioning of culture falls on a difficult historical period of transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages, including the era of the great migration of peoples. The degree of study of the Poltsevskaya culture varies across territories. In the Amur region, the dynamics of the development of the Poltsevskaya culture was revealed: Zheltyy Yar (7th–6th century BC); Poltsevskaya (6th–2nd–1st centuries BC); Kukelevsky (1st–4th centuries AD), the contact of the Poltsevskaya culture with medieval Tungus-Manchus people (carriers of the Mohe culture) was traced, two locally-chronological groups of monuments Blagoslaveninskaya and Naifeldskaya with Poltsevo-Mohe traditions were identified (4th–9th centuries AD). In China, three of its varieties were distinguished. In Primorye, the study of culture is controversial, which is manifested in the variety of cultural names including those of Suyfunskaya, Olginskaya, Poltsevskaya, Smolninskaya and Nikolaevskaya. All the cultural communities claim to be independent. However, the identified cultural indicators on the single-layer monuments of Primorye: Monakino 4, Wrangel 3, Mikhailovskoye settlement as evidence for a common Poltsevskaya culture or identity developing in time and space. The Poltsevskaya culture traditions are preserved in the material culture of the Far Eastern Paleoasiates (Nivkhs people) up to the present.","PeriodicalId":34663,"journal":{"name":"Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2023.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spreading area of monuments of the Poltsevskaya culture of the Far East is extensive. In Russia, they are located across the territories of the Amur region and of Primorye, in China they spread throughout Manchuria. The time of the functioning of culture falls on a difficult historical period of transition from antiquity to the Middle Ages, including the era of the great migration of peoples. The degree of study of the Poltsevskaya culture varies across territories. In the Amur region, the dynamics of the development of the Poltsevskaya culture was revealed: Zheltyy Yar (7th–6th century BC); Poltsevskaya (6th–2nd–1st centuries BC); Kukelevsky (1st–4th centuries AD), the contact of the Poltsevskaya culture with medieval Tungus-Manchus people (carriers of the Mohe culture) was traced, two locally-chronological groups of monuments Blagoslaveninskaya and Naifeldskaya with Poltsevo-Mohe traditions were identified (4th–9th centuries AD). In China, three of its varieties were distinguished. In Primorye, the study of culture is controversial, which is manifested in the variety of cultural names including those of Suyfunskaya, Olginskaya, Poltsevskaya, Smolninskaya and Nikolaevskaya. All the cultural communities claim to be independent. However, the identified cultural indicators on the single-layer monuments of Primorye: Monakino 4, Wrangel 3, Mikhailovskoye settlement as evidence for a common Poltsevskaya culture or identity developing in time and space. The Poltsevskaya culture traditions are preserved in the material culture of the Far Eastern Paleoasiates (Nivkhs people) up to the present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族文化指标背景下的滨海波尔采夫斯卡亚文化
远东波尔采夫斯卡娅文化遗迹的传播范围很广。在俄罗斯,它们分布在阿穆尔地区和普里莫耶的领土上,在中国,它们遍布满洲。文化发挥作用的时期正处于从古代向中世纪过渡的艰难历史时期,包括人民大迁徙的时代。波尔采夫斯卡娅文化的研究程度因地区而异。在阿穆尔地区,波尔采夫斯卡娅文化的发展动态被揭示:Zheltyy Yar(公元前7至6世纪);波尔采夫斯卡娅(公元前6–2–1世纪);Kukelevsky(公元1-4世纪),追溯了波尔采夫斯卡娅文化与中世纪通古斯-满人(漠河文化的载体)的接触,确定了两组具有波尔采沃-漠河传统的按当地时间顺序排列的纪念碑Blagoslaveninskaya和Naifeldskaya(公元4-9世纪)。在中国,有三个品种是与众不同的。在普里莫耶,对文化的研究是有争议的,表现在文化名称的多样性上,包括苏芬斯卡娅、奥尔金斯卡娅、波尔采夫斯卡娅、斯莫尔宁斯卡娅和尼古拉耶夫斯卡娅。所有的文化团体都声称是独立的。然而,Primorye单层纪念碑上确定的文化指标:Monakino 4、Wrangel 3、Mikhailovskoye定居点,作为在时间和空间上发展的共同Poltsevskaya文化或身份的证据。波尔采夫斯卡娅文化传统一直保存在远东古亚洲人(Nivkhs人)的物质文化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik
Nizhnevolzhskii arkheologicheskii vestnik Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Interdisciplinary Research in Archeology at Volgograd State University Rhodian Amphorae of the 3rd – 2nd Centuries BC from the Krasnodar Museum Collection New Research on the Beslan Kurgan Catacomb Burial Mound New Data on the Technology of Manufacturing Blacksmith Products of the Golden Horde Rural Settlements Based on Metallographic Analyses Results of Items from Bagaevka and Shiroky Buerak Settlements Poltsevskaya Cultures of Primorye in the Context of Ethnocultural Indicators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1