Multi-criteria social sustainability assessment of highland maize monoculture in Northern Thailand using the SAFA tool

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources Environment and Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100115
Unruan Leknoi , Peter Rosset , Suched Likitlersuang
{"title":"Multi-criteria social sustainability assessment of highland maize monoculture in Northern Thailand using the SAFA tool","authors":"Unruan Leknoi ,&nbsp;Peter Rosset ,&nbsp;Suched Likitlersuang","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2023.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture System (SAFA) is a multi-criteria sustainability assessment tool developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2014. This study aims to contribute to the debate on multi-criteria sustainability assessments by applying the SAFA to a test case of an agricultural supply chain, including production, processing, distribution, and marketing. The study case of the maize monoculture value chain in the Mae Chaem District of Chiang Mai Province was selected as a typical highland maize monoculture in northern Thailand. The study area is the site of a rapidly expanding peasant farmer boom of maize production and global livestock feed industry. This qualitative research employs in-depth interviews and questionnaires of all participants along the value chain of the study area. Multiple social sustainability dimensions including decent livelihood, fair trading practices, labor rights, equity, human safety and health, and cultural diversity were assessed using the SAFA tool. The analysis results were moderately favorable in terms of social sustainability, which to a notable extent contrasts with sustainability issues surrounding maize monoculture in Northern Thailand. In terms of the social sustainability dimensions of fair trading practices and of decent livelihood, the results suggest that the contract farming system usually employed in the highland maize monoculture in northern Thailand is unsustainable. Finally, we discussed the limitations of the SAFA tool.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916123000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture System (SAFA) is a multi-criteria sustainability assessment tool developed by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2014. This study aims to contribute to the debate on multi-criteria sustainability assessments by applying the SAFA to a test case of an agricultural supply chain, including production, processing, distribution, and marketing. The study case of the maize monoculture value chain in the Mae Chaem District of Chiang Mai Province was selected as a typical highland maize monoculture in northern Thailand. The study area is the site of a rapidly expanding peasant farmer boom of maize production and global livestock feed industry. This qualitative research employs in-depth interviews and questionnaires of all participants along the value chain of the study area. Multiple social sustainability dimensions including decent livelihood, fair trading practices, labor rights, equity, human safety and health, and cultural diversity were assessed using the SAFA tool. The analysis results were moderately favorable in terms of social sustainability, which to a notable extent contrasts with sustainability issues surrounding maize monoculture in Northern Thailand. In terms of the social sustainability dimensions of fair trading practices and of decent livelihood, the results suggest that the contract farming system usually employed in the highland maize monoculture in northern Thailand is unsustainable. Finally, we discussed the limitations of the SAFA tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用SAFA工具对泰国北部高地玉米单一种植进行多标准社会可持续性评估
粮食及农业系统可持续性评估(SAFA)是联合国粮食及农业组织于2014年开发的多标准可持续性评估工具。本研究旨在通过将SAFA应用于农业供应链(包括生产、加工、分销和营销)的测试案例,促进关于多标准可持续性评估的辩论。选取清迈省湄湛地区的玉米单一栽培价值链研究案例作为泰国北部典型的高原玉米单一栽培案例。该研究区域是玉米生产和全球牲畜饲料工业迅速发展的农民热潮的所在地。本定性研究采用深度访谈和问卷调查的所有参与者沿着价值链的研究区域。使用SAFA工具评估了社会可持续性的多个方面,包括体面的生计、公平的贸易做法、劳工权利、公平、人类安全和健康以及文化多样性。分析结果在社会可持续性方面较为有利,这在很大程度上与泰国北部玉米单一栽培的可持续性问题形成对比。就公平贸易实践和体面生计的社会可持续性方面而言,研究结果表明,泰国北部高地玉米单一栽培中通常采用的合同耕作制度是不可持续的。最后,我们讨论了SAFA工具的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Unveiling driving disparities between satisfaction and equity of ecosystem services in urbanized areas Unraveling the impact of global change on glomalin and implications for soil carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems Appropriately delayed flooding before rice transplanting increases net ecosystem economic benefit in the winter green manure-rice rotation system Clubroot disease in soil: An examination of its occurrence in chemical and organic environments Based on experiment and quantum chemical calculations: a study of the co-pyrolysis mechanism of polyesterimide enameled wires with polyvinyl chloride and the catalytic effect of endogenous metal Cu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1