Accuracy of Computer-Guided Template-Based Implant Surgery: A Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Follow-Up Study.

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry Implant Dentistry Pub Date : 2019-09-10 DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000936
Tobias Schelbert, T. Gander, M. Blumer, R. Jung, M. Rücker, C. Rostetter
{"title":"Accuracy of Computer-Guided Template-Based Implant Surgery: A Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Follow-Up Study.","authors":"Tobias Schelbert, T. Gander, M. Blumer, R. Jung, M. Rücker, C. Rostetter","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe aim of this clinical study was to analyze the accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nAssisted by computed tomography (CT)-based planning software and navigational templates, 16 patients successfully received 26 dental implants. Each implant parameter (a-d) was calculated based on superimposed preoperative and postoperative cone beam CT scans: (a) deviation at entry point; (b) deviation at apex; (c) angular deviation; and (d) depth deviation.\n\n\nRESULTS\nMean central deviation at implant entry point and apex was 0.91 mm (standard error [SE] = 0.11 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.13) and 1.22 mm (SE = 0.11 mm; 95% CI: 0.99-1.45), respectively. Mean angulation deviation was 4.11 degrees (SE = 0.52 degrees; 95% CI: 3.04-5.17) and the average depth deviation was 0.65 mm (SE = 0.11 mm; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). For the total number of implants placed, the maximum error was 2.34 mm at entry point, 2.71 mm at apex, 9.44 degrees in angular deviation, and 2.00 mm in depth deviation.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nGreat accuracy was reached even in advanced cases with prior bone augmentation and complex traumas. This leads to the conclusion that particularly in advanced cases, computer-guided implantation can be beneficial.","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000936","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000936","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this clinical study was to analyze the accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS Assisted by computed tomography (CT)-based planning software and navigational templates, 16 patients successfully received 26 dental implants. Each implant parameter (a-d) was calculated based on superimposed preoperative and postoperative cone beam CT scans: (a) deviation at entry point; (b) deviation at apex; (c) angular deviation; and (d) depth deviation. RESULTS Mean central deviation at implant entry point and apex was 0.91 mm (standard error [SE] = 0.11 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.13) and 1.22 mm (SE = 0.11 mm; 95% CI: 0.99-1.45), respectively. Mean angulation deviation was 4.11 degrees (SE = 0.52 degrees; 95% CI: 3.04-5.17) and the average depth deviation was 0.65 mm (SE = 0.11 mm; 95% CI: 0.42-0.87). For the total number of implants placed, the maximum error was 2.34 mm at entry point, 2.71 mm at apex, 9.44 degrees in angular deviation, and 2.00 mm in depth deviation. CONCLUSION Great accuracy was reached even in advanced cases with prior bone augmentation and complex traumas. This leads to the conclusion that particularly in advanced cases, computer-guided implantation can be beneficial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机引导模板植入手术的准确性:基于计算机断层扫描的临床随访研究。
目的分析计算机引导种植体手术的准确性。材料与方法在计算机断层扫描(CT)规划软件和导航模板的辅助下,16例患者成功种植26颗牙。每个种植体参数(a-d)基于术前和术后锥形束CT扫描的叠加计算:(a)进入点偏差;(b)顶点偏差;(c)角偏差;(d)深度偏差。结果种植体进入点和顶端的平均中心偏差为0.91 mm(标准误差[SE] = 0.11 mm;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.69-1.13)和1.22 mm (SE = 0.11 mm;95% CI: 0.99-1.45)。平均角度偏差为4.11度(SE = 0.52度;95% CI: 3.04-5.17),平均深度偏差为0.65 mm (SE = 0.11 mm;95% ci: 0.42-0.87)。在种植体总数上,最大误差为入口2.34 mm,顶点2.71 mm,角偏差9.44°,深度偏差2.00 mm。结论即使是已做过骨增强手术的晚期患者和复杂创伤患者,也能达到较高的准确性。由此得出结论,特别是在晚期病例中,计算机引导的植入可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
期刊最新文献
The Editorial Council Clinical Implications of Functional Mitral Regurgitation Severity in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). Implant. Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Long-Term Outcomes of Tooth-Implant-Supported Rehabilitation of Periodontally Compromised and Treated Patients Refusing Bone Grafting Surgical Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1