{"title":"Origin of the subphylum Asterozoa and redescription of a Moroccan Ordovician somasteroid","authors":"Daniel B. Blake , Frederick H.C. Hotchkiss","doi":"10.1016/j.geobios.2022.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A proposed new Ordovician asterozoan genus and species, <em>Cantabrigiaster fezouataensis</em>, has been recently described and assigned to the class Somasteroidea. An accompanying phylogenetic analysis treated twenty-two asterozoans and sixteen early non-asterozoans, one of the latter providing the outgroup. The phylogenetic hypothesis focused on derivation of the subphylum Asterozoa and emphasized the Crinoidea; <em>Cantabrigiaster fezouataensis</em> was interpreted as documenting a critical transition stage in the origin of the Asterozoa. The diagnosis for the proposed new generic name posits absence of ambital framework ossicles as the single character expression that distinguishes <em>Cantabrigiaster</em> among somasteroid genera. Ambital framework ossicular presence is documented here in the holotype and other members of type suite; <em>Cantabrigiaster</em> is synonymized with <em>Villebrunaster</em> Spencer and <em>V. fezouataensis</em> nov. comb. is redescribed. The data matrix for the former <em>Cantabrigiaster</em> phylogenetic analysis relies on an earlier study treating overall echinoderm construction. Expressions outlined in the earlier study are not amenable to transfer to a data matrix without evaluation of level of universality of each cited expression; such evaluations were not provided thereby leading to flawed phylogenetic conclusions that are rejected. An alternative hypothesis for the early history of the Asterozoa supported by aspects of the fossil record, that subphylum diversification preceded the origin of readily preserved skeletons, and therefore potentially no tenable pre-asterozoan outgroup candidate survives in the fossil record, has not been falsified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55116,"journal":{"name":"Geobios","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 22-36"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016699522000389/pdfft?md5=0d8ea07ca762484a71d635d4f34191d1&pid=1-s2.0-S0016699522000389-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geobios","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016699522000389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
A proposed new Ordovician asterozoan genus and species, Cantabrigiaster fezouataensis, has been recently described and assigned to the class Somasteroidea. An accompanying phylogenetic analysis treated twenty-two asterozoans and sixteen early non-asterozoans, one of the latter providing the outgroup. The phylogenetic hypothesis focused on derivation of the subphylum Asterozoa and emphasized the Crinoidea; Cantabrigiaster fezouataensis was interpreted as documenting a critical transition stage in the origin of the Asterozoa. The diagnosis for the proposed new generic name posits absence of ambital framework ossicles as the single character expression that distinguishes Cantabrigiaster among somasteroid genera. Ambital framework ossicular presence is documented here in the holotype and other members of type suite; Cantabrigiaster is synonymized with Villebrunaster Spencer and V. fezouataensis nov. comb. is redescribed. The data matrix for the former Cantabrigiaster phylogenetic analysis relies on an earlier study treating overall echinoderm construction. Expressions outlined in the earlier study are not amenable to transfer to a data matrix without evaluation of level of universality of each cited expression; such evaluations were not provided thereby leading to flawed phylogenetic conclusions that are rejected. An alternative hypothesis for the early history of the Asterozoa supported by aspects of the fossil record, that subphylum diversification preceded the origin of readily preserved skeletons, and therefore potentially no tenable pre-asterozoan outgroup candidate survives in the fossil record, has not been falsified.
期刊介绍:
Geobios publishes bimonthly in English original peer-reviewed articles of international interest in any area of paleontology, paleobiology, paleoecology, paleobiogeography, (bio)stratigraphy and biogeochemistry. All taxonomic groups are treated, including microfossils, invertebrates, plants, vertebrates and ichnofossils.
Geobios welcomes descriptive papers based on original material (e.g. large Systematic Paleontology works), as well as more analytically and/or methodologically oriented papers, provided they offer strong and significant biochronological/biostratigraphical, paleobiogeographical, paleobiological and/or phylogenetic new insights and perspectices. A high priority level is given to synchronic and/or diachronic studies based on multi- or inter-disciplinary approaches mixing various fields of Earth and Life Sciences. Works based on extant data are also considered, provided they offer significant insights into geological-time studies.