To Give or to Receive? The Role of Giver Versus Receiver on Object Tracking and Object Preferences in Children and Adults

IF 0.6 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Cognition and Culture Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.1163/15685373-12340117
Nicholaus S. Noles, S. Gelman, Sarah M. Stilwell
{"title":"To Give or to Receive? The Role of Giver Versus Receiver on Object Tracking and Object Preferences in Children and Adults","authors":"Nicholaus S. Noles, S. Gelman, Sarah M. Stilwell","doi":"10.1163/15685373-12340117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFor adults, ownership is a concept that rests on principles and connections that apply broadly – whether the owner is the self or someone else, and whether the self is giver or receiver. The present studies tested whether preschool children likewise treat ownership in this abstract fashion. In Experiment 1, 20 children and 24 adults were assigned to be either “givers” or “receivers.” They were then asked to identify which items they and the researcher owned. In Experiment 2, 20 children and 24 adults were asked which items they and the experimenter liked best. In both experiments, participants’ judgments were not influenced by their role (giver vs. receiver), but were more adult-like when reasoning about self-owned than other-owned objects. These data suggest that intuitions about property ownership are initially egocentric – biased toward linking objects to one’s self – and then extend to others over the course of development.","PeriodicalId":46186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For adults, ownership is a concept that rests on principles and connections that apply broadly – whether the owner is the self or someone else, and whether the self is giver or receiver. The present studies tested whether preschool children likewise treat ownership in this abstract fashion. In Experiment 1, 20 children and 24 adults were assigned to be either “givers” or “receivers.” They were then asked to identify which items they and the researcher owned. In Experiment 2, 20 children and 24 adults were asked which items they and the experimenter liked best. In both experiments, participants’ judgments were not influenced by their role (giver vs. receiver), but were more adult-like when reasoning about self-owned than other-owned objects. These data suggest that intuitions about property ownership are initially egocentric – biased toward linking objects to one’s self – and then extend to others over the course of development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
给予还是接受?施予者与接受者在儿童和成人对象跟踪和对象偏好中的作用
对于成年人来说,所有权是一个基于广泛适用的原则和联系的概念——无论所有者是自己还是他人,无论自我是给予者还是接受者。目前的研究测试了学龄前儿童是否也以这种抽象的方式对待所有权。在实验1中,20名儿童和24名成年人被分配为“给予者”或“接受者”。然后,他们被要求识别自己和研究人员拥有的物品。在实验2中,20名儿童和24名成年人被问及他们和实验者最喜欢哪些项目。在这两个实验中,参与者的判断不受他们的角色(给予者与接受者)的影响,但在推理自己拥有的物品时,他们比其他拥有的物品更像成年人。这些数据表明,关于财产所有权的直觉最初是以自我为中心的——倾向于将物体与自己联系起来——然后在发展过程中延伸到他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Journal of Cognition and Culture PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognition and Culture provides an interdisciplinary forum for exploring the mental foundations of culture and the cultural foundations of mental life. The primary focus of the journal is on explanations of cultural phenomena in terms of acquisition, representation and transmission involving cognitive capacities without excluding the study of cultural differences. The journal contains articles, commentaries, reports of experiments, and book reviews that emerge out of the inquiries by, and conversations between, scholars in experimental psychology, developmental psychology, social cognition, neuroscience, human evolution, cognitive science of religion, and cognitive anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Sentiments Organize Affect Concepts in Yasawa, Fiji: a Cultural Domain Analysis The Role of Spoken Language on Performance of Cognitive Tests: the Indonesian Experience Tribal Politics: Political Orientation Predicts Authoritarian Traits, Cross-Cultural Interactions, and Adherence to Common Identity Factors Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: Groupism and Cognition An Evolutionary Model of Early Theology When Moral and Religious Capacities Converge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1