Influence of smile and facial angulations on facial attractiveness: Perceptions of laypersons, dentists and orthodontists

IF 0.1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijor.ijor_16_20
Sweta Saravanan, S. Kannan, Nitin Arora, A. Singh, Abhita Malhotra
{"title":"Influence of smile and facial angulations on facial attractiveness: Perceptions of laypersons, dentists and orthodontists","authors":"Sweta Saravanan, S. Kannan, Nitin Arora, A. Singh, Abhita Malhotra","doi":"10.4103/ijor.ijor_16_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the facial profile view perceived as most attractive and whether this attractiveness was influenced in a neutral and smiling face. Methodology: Sixty participants (20 each of laypersons, dentists, and orthodontists) were chosen for the study. Their facial photos were taken along with professional models' with normal occlusion. Participants were asked to rate self and model photos using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) based on attractiveness; select most attractive face by looking at panels with 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° rotated facial photos of neutral and smiling for models and self; select most attractive photo from the combination panels of neutral and smiling photos of self and model. Results: VAS scores by orthodontists for both neutral and smiling faces for both self and model were more or less similar. Dentists and laypersons found smiling photographs more attractive. The 45 angle was perceived most attractive in self and model for both the neutral and smiling categories separately by all three groups. In the combination category, orthodontist perceived the 0° smiling (model) as the most attractive followed by 45° smiling, whereas dentists and laypersons found 45° smiling photographs most attractive. Conclusion: The 45° profile view was most preferred by all three groups when assessing self as well as models. Smiling photographs of both self and model are considered more attractive than neutral photographs.","PeriodicalId":29888,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijor.ijor_16_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the facial profile view perceived as most attractive and whether this attractiveness was influenced in a neutral and smiling face. Methodology: Sixty participants (20 each of laypersons, dentists, and orthodontists) were chosen for the study. Their facial photos were taken along with professional models' with normal occlusion. Participants were asked to rate self and model photos using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) based on attractiveness; select most attractive face by looking at panels with 0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° rotated facial photos of neutral and smiling for models and self; select most attractive photo from the combination panels of neutral and smiling photos of self and model. Results: VAS scores by orthodontists for both neutral and smiling faces for both self and model were more or less similar. Dentists and laypersons found smiling photographs more attractive. The 45 angle was perceived most attractive in self and model for both the neutral and smiling categories separately by all three groups. In the combination category, orthodontist perceived the 0° smiling (model) as the most attractive followed by 45° smiling, whereas dentists and laypersons found 45° smiling photographs most attractive. Conclusion: The 45° profile view was most preferred by all three groups when assessing self as well as models. Smiling photographs of both self and model are considered more attractive than neutral photographs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微笑和面部角度对面部吸引力的影响:外行人、牙医和正畸医生的感知
目的:评估被认为最具吸引力的面部轮廓图,以及这种吸引力是否受到中性和微笑脸的影响。方法:选择60名参与者(非专业人员、牙医和正畸医生各20人)进行研究。他们的面部照片是和正常遮挡的专业模特一起拍摄的。参与者被要求根据吸引力使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对自己和模特的照片进行评分;通过观察0°、30°、45°、60°和90°旋转的中性和微笑面部照片面板,为模特和自己选择最具吸引力的面部;从自己和模特的中性和微笑照片组合面板中选择最吸引人的照片。结果:正畸医生对中性脸和微笑脸的VAS评分,无论是对自己还是对模特,都或多或少相似。牙医和普通人发现微笑的照片更有吸引力。在中性和微笑两个类别中,所有三组都认为45度角在自我和模型中最具吸引力。在组合类别中,正畸医生认为0°微笑(模特)最具吸引力,其次是45°微笑,而牙医和非专业人士认为45°微笑的照片最具吸引力。结论:在评估自我和模型时,所有三组都最喜欢45°剖面图。自我和模特的微笑照片被认为比中性照片更有吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation
International Journal of Orthodontic Rehabilitation DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Quality of Life (QoL) changes after orthognathic surgery: Do they correlate with the quantum of hard and soft tissue change? Airway Analysis in Different Malocclusions - A Cephalometric Study Perception of Dental Caries Risk and Prevention among Orthodontic Patients – A Cross-Sectional Survey Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy as an adjunct periodontal intervention in periodontally diseased subjects undergoing orthodontic therapy Uprighting A Horizontally Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Using Modified Bach’s Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1