Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis: An Examination of Driving Beliefs and Practices of Medical and Recreational Cannabis Users across the United States

C. Cuttler, M. Sexton, Laurie K Mischley
{"title":"Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis: An Examination of Driving Beliefs and Practices of Medical and Recreational Cannabis Users across the United States","authors":"C. Cuttler, M. Sexton, Laurie K Mischley","doi":"10.26828/CANNABIS.2018.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trends toward the legalization of cannabis are raising concerns about driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). The goal of this study was to examine the percentage of cannabis users who believe DUIC is safe, who drive within one hour of using cannabis, and who have experienced a DUIC-related incident (i.e., ticket/accident). We further sought to compare these percentages in exclusively medical versus exclusively recreational versus mixed cannabis users and in participants surveyed before versus after legal sales of recreational cannabis. Finally, we examined predictors of DUIC beliefs, practices, and incidents. An anonymous online survey was administered to cannabis users across the 50 United States (N=1773; 54% Male) to assess DUIC beliefs, practices, and incidents. 52.4% reported believing DUIC is safe, 52.1% admitted to driving within one hour of using cannabis, but only 3.9% reported experiencing a DUIC-related incident. No significant differences were found in exclusively medical, exclusively recreational, and mixed cannabis users or in WA respondents surveyed before- and after-legal sales in WA state. Older age, less education, higher frequency and quantities of use, and driving within one hour of use predicted beliefs DUIC is safe. Younger age, more education, higher frequency and quantities of use, younger age of first use, and beliefs DUIC is safe predicted driving within one hour of using cannabis. Male gender, lower income, and higher frequency of use predicted DUIC-related incidents. Rates of DUIC are high among cannabis users but self-reported accidents/tickets are low. Recreational cannabis sales do not appear to be exacerbating these rates. \nDOI: 10.26828/cannabis.2018.02.001","PeriodicalId":72520,"journal":{"name":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/CANNABIS.2018.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Trends toward the legalization of cannabis are raising concerns about driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). The goal of this study was to examine the percentage of cannabis users who believe DUIC is safe, who drive within one hour of using cannabis, and who have experienced a DUIC-related incident (i.e., ticket/accident). We further sought to compare these percentages in exclusively medical versus exclusively recreational versus mixed cannabis users and in participants surveyed before versus after legal sales of recreational cannabis. Finally, we examined predictors of DUIC beliefs, practices, and incidents. An anonymous online survey was administered to cannabis users across the 50 United States (N=1773; 54% Male) to assess DUIC beliefs, practices, and incidents. 52.4% reported believing DUIC is safe, 52.1% admitted to driving within one hour of using cannabis, but only 3.9% reported experiencing a DUIC-related incident. No significant differences were found in exclusively medical, exclusively recreational, and mixed cannabis users or in WA respondents surveyed before- and after-legal sales in WA state. Older age, less education, higher frequency and quantities of use, and driving within one hour of use predicted beliefs DUIC is safe. Younger age, more education, higher frequency and quantities of use, younger age of first use, and beliefs DUIC is safe predicted driving within one hour of using cannabis. Male gender, lower income, and higher frequency of use predicted DUIC-related incidents. Rates of DUIC are high among cannabis users but self-reported accidents/tickets are low. Recreational cannabis sales do not appear to be exacerbating these rates. DOI: 10.26828/cannabis.2018.02.001
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大麻影响下的驾驶:美国各地医疗和娱乐大麻使用者的驾驶信念和实践调查
大麻合法化的趋势引发了人们对受大麻影响驾驶的担忧。这项研究的目的是调查相信酒后驾车是安全的、在使用大麻后一小时内开车的以及经历过酒后驾车相关事件(即罚单/事故)的大麻使用者的百分比。我们进一步试图比较纯医疗、纯娱乐、混合大麻使用者以及在合法销售娱乐大麻之前与之后接受调查的参与者的这些百分比。最后,我们研究了酒后驾车信念、行为和事件的预测因素。对50个美国的大麻使用者(N=1773;54%为男性)进行了一项匿名在线调查,以评估酒后驾车的信念、行为和事件。52.4%的人表示相信酒后驾车是安全的,52.1%的人承认在使用大麻后一小时内开车,但只有3.9%的人表示经历过酒后驾车相关事件。在纯医疗、纯娱乐和混合大麻使用者中,或在西澳州合法销售前后接受调查的西澳州受访者中,没有发现显著差异。年龄较大,受教育程度较低,使用频率和数量较高,并且在使用后一小时内驾驶,可以预测酒后驾车是安全的。年龄更小,受教育程度更高,使用频率和数量更高,首次使用的年龄更小,并且相信酒后驾车是安全的,预测在使用大麻一小时内驾驶。男性、收入较低和使用频率较高可预测酒后驾车相关事件。大麻使用者的酒后驾车率很高,但自我报告的事故/罚单却很低。娱乐性大麻销售似乎并没有加剧这些比率。DOI:10.26828/cannabis.2018.02.001
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring Cannabis Reinforcement among Young Adults: A Mixed Methods Examination. Emotion Regulation Moderates Associations between Discrimination and Cannabis Use Patterns among Sexual Minority Young Adult Women. Correlates of Cannabis Use and Self-Control Across a Diverse Sample of College Students: 2020-2022. Examination of Rumination's Mediating Role in the Relation Between Distal Personality Predictors, Cannabis Coping Motives, and Negative Cannabis-Related Consequences. Dose-dependent Relationships of Same-day and Typical Substance Use to Sleep Duration in College Cannabis and Alcohol Users: A Multilevel Modeling Approach Using Daily Diary Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1