Book Review of Why They Can't Write by John Warner

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Food Science Education Pub Date : 2019-10-03 DOI:10.1111/1541-4329.12171
Helen Joyner
{"title":"Book Review of Why They Can't Write by John Warner","authors":"Helen Joyner","doi":"10.1111/1541-4329.12171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p></p><p>Why They Can't Write. By John Warner. 2018. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 978-1-421-42711-7</p><p>“They just can't write!” It's a common faculty complaint: students don't seem to be able to coherently express their thoughts in writing. But while there is a considerable amount of faculty distress over students’ poor writing abilities (not to mention anxiety from students about their grades on any writing assignment), and a general consensus that the problem lies somewhere in K-12 education, faculty generally are unsure of how to help students improve their writing.</p><p>In his book <i>Why They Can't Write</i>, John Warner discusses the reasons students don't write well and what can be done to improve their writing. An instructor of writing for twenty years at multiple universities, Warner has developed a solid framework for addressing the root cause of student writing troubles and helping them develop as writers.</p><p>So why <i>can't</i> they write? Interestingly, it's not mobile devices, lack of instructional rigor, bad instruction, or lazy students. Instead, Warner writes, it's because we focus too much on teaching students how to write “properly”, that is, in a standard format. Remember the five-paragraph essay? This is the primary format for writing instruction in current K-12 education. For those of you who were fortunate enough to escape learning that particular writing format, the five-paragraph essay comprises an introductory paragraph, three paragraphs of explanation or idea development, and a concluding paragraph that generally starts with “In conclusion, …”. On top of that, each paragraph must be three to five sentences long and each sentence needs to be five to nine words. It's an extremely restrictive format that does not lend itself well to either scientific or creating writing.</p><p>If this format is so bad, then why do we still use it? The reason, Warner explains, is standardized testing. For example, the scorers for the writing section of the SAT had a maximum of three minutes to grade each essay. While the SAT no longer includes a writing section, other standardized writing tests are scored similarly. Additionally, students are often informed (or figure out) that accuracy of content takes second place to polysyllabic words and imposing-sounding phrasing. After all, if someone is frantically skimming an essay so they can meet their quota (yes, there are quotas for scorers), they don't have time to parse out the actual meaning of that flowery sentence and will likely score the essay well based on vocabulary.</p><p>Warner also notes that there are other problems in writing education that are general problems in our current educational system. These issues include an increase in student surveillance, constant pursuance of educational fads that lack supporting research, the perception of technology as a panacea for all educational woes, and proliferation of standardized testing. Together, these issues result in pressure on instructors to teach to the test and a general feeling among students that school is awful. Interestingly, Warner notes that students generally enjoy learning. They just don't like school. And that's not surprising, Warner writes, since the focus on standardized testing creates an enormous amount of stress and anxiety, not to mention that students often realize that all the memorization they're doing to pass the tests doesn't have a lot of use in the real world.</p><p>So, what can we do to help students become better writers? Warner proposes several key changes to writing instruction. First, students need writing experiences. But these shouldn't be limited to the usual term paper. Instead, students should be encouraged to write about topics that are meaningful to them. This will help motivate them to really think about what they are writing and do their best work. Students also need to learn how to think like writers. What point are they trying to make? Who is the audience? What knowledge do they need to successfully present their argument? Considering all of these questions will help students craft their writing appropriately. Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, students need to learn the writing process and be held accountable for their own work. They need to experience the process of drafting, revising, and polishing their writing. Doing so under the guidance of an experienced writer is even more beneficial, as students can see how a more experienced writer interprets their writing and what suggestions they have for improvement.</p><p>All of this is great, but those are some pretty big changes. How can they be accomplished? Warner acknowledges that there are no quick fixes for making students better writers. He ends the book with suggestions of what can be done to start implementing the key changes discussed above and invites everyone to engage in conversation about teaching and learning writing, and how we can start improving it. This book ends on a positive note and leaves the reader energized and ready to help their students become better writers.</p><p>This book gave me some excellent ideas to help my students, particularly my graduate students, improve their writing. I have always reviewed my grads’ theses first for content, then for syntax. Over the past six years, I have switched from using Track Changes in Word to notations in comment for the syntax edits. I thought that would help my students learn how to write more clearly and with better flow: instead of just blithely accepting changes without looking at them, they would have to make those changes themselves. However, after reading <i>Why They Can't Write</i>, I realized that this practice still wasn't helping them. I was still dictating what their writing should look like instead of letting them explore different phrasings and content organization. I also wasn't actively modeling the writing process. My students were left to interpret why I left the comments on their own, which often led to a check-box mentality under which they just went through the document making changes without wondering why I suggested them or why the change was superior (at least in my opinion) to the original.</p><p>So far, my students are appreciative of these strategies and feel more comfortable about the writing process. We'll see how things go as they continue working on writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":44041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1541-4329.12171","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1541-4329.12171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why They Can't Write. By John Warner. 2018. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 978-1-421-42711-7

“They just can't write!” It's a common faculty complaint: students don't seem to be able to coherently express their thoughts in writing. But while there is a considerable amount of faculty distress over students’ poor writing abilities (not to mention anxiety from students about their grades on any writing assignment), and a general consensus that the problem lies somewhere in K-12 education, faculty generally are unsure of how to help students improve their writing.

In his book Why They Can't Write, John Warner discusses the reasons students don't write well and what can be done to improve their writing. An instructor of writing for twenty years at multiple universities, Warner has developed a solid framework for addressing the root cause of student writing troubles and helping them develop as writers.

So why can't they write? Interestingly, it's not mobile devices, lack of instructional rigor, bad instruction, or lazy students. Instead, Warner writes, it's because we focus too much on teaching students how to write “properly”, that is, in a standard format. Remember the five-paragraph essay? This is the primary format for writing instruction in current K-12 education. For those of you who were fortunate enough to escape learning that particular writing format, the five-paragraph essay comprises an introductory paragraph, three paragraphs of explanation or idea development, and a concluding paragraph that generally starts with “In conclusion, …”. On top of that, each paragraph must be three to five sentences long and each sentence needs to be five to nine words. It's an extremely restrictive format that does not lend itself well to either scientific or creating writing.

If this format is so bad, then why do we still use it? The reason, Warner explains, is standardized testing. For example, the scorers for the writing section of the SAT had a maximum of three minutes to grade each essay. While the SAT no longer includes a writing section, other standardized writing tests are scored similarly. Additionally, students are often informed (or figure out) that accuracy of content takes second place to polysyllabic words and imposing-sounding phrasing. After all, if someone is frantically skimming an essay so they can meet their quota (yes, there are quotas for scorers), they don't have time to parse out the actual meaning of that flowery sentence and will likely score the essay well based on vocabulary.

Warner also notes that there are other problems in writing education that are general problems in our current educational system. These issues include an increase in student surveillance, constant pursuance of educational fads that lack supporting research, the perception of technology as a panacea for all educational woes, and proliferation of standardized testing. Together, these issues result in pressure on instructors to teach to the test and a general feeling among students that school is awful. Interestingly, Warner notes that students generally enjoy learning. They just don't like school. And that's not surprising, Warner writes, since the focus on standardized testing creates an enormous amount of stress and anxiety, not to mention that students often realize that all the memorization they're doing to pass the tests doesn't have a lot of use in the real world.

So, what can we do to help students become better writers? Warner proposes several key changes to writing instruction. First, students need writing experiences. But these shouldn't be limited to the usual term paper. Instead, students should be encouraged to write about topics that are meaningful to them. This will help motivate them to really think about what they are writing and do their best work. Students also need to learn how to think like writers. What point are they trying to make? Who is the audience? What knowledge do they need to successfully present their argument? Considering all of these questions will help students craft their writing appropriately. Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly, students need to learn the writing process and be held accountable for their own work. They need to experience the process of drafting, revising, and polishing their writing. Doing so under the guidance of an experienced writer is even more beneficial, as students can see how a more experienced writer interprets their writing and what suggestions they have for improvement.

All of this is great, but those are some pretty big changes. How can they be accomplished? Warner acknowledges that there are no quick fixes for making students better writers. He ends the book with suggestions of what can be done to start implementing the key changes discussed above and invites everyone to engage in conversation about teaching and learning writing, and how we can start improving it. This book ends on a positive note and leaves the reader energized and ready to help their students become better writers.

This book gave me some excellent ideas to help my students, particularly my graduate students, improve their writing. I have always reviewed my grads’ theses first for content, then for syntax. Over the past six years, I have switched from using Track Changes in Word to notations in comment for the syntax edits. I thought that would help my students learn how to write more clearly and with better flow: instead of just blithely accepting changes without looking at them, they would have to make those changes themselves. However, after reading Why They Can't Write, I realized that this practice still wasn't helping them. I was still dictating what their writing should look like instead of letting them explore different phrasings and content organization. I also wasn't actively modeling the writing process. My students were left to interpret why I left the comments on their own, which often led to a check-box mentality under which they just went through the document making changes without wondering why I suggested them or why the change was superior (at least in my opinion) to the original.

So far, my students are appreciative of these strategies and feel more comfortable about the writing process. We'll see how things go as they continue working on writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
约翰·华纳的《为什么他们不能写作》书评
为什么他们不会写字。约翰·华纳著,2018。约翰霍普金斯大学出版社。“他们就是不会写字!”这是一个常见的教师抱怨:学生似乎不能在写作中连贯地表达自己的想法。但是,尽管有相当多的教师对学生糟糕的写作能力感到苦恼(更不用说学生对任何写作作业成绩的焦虑),并且普遍认为问题存在于K-12教育的某个地方,但教师通常不确定如何帮助学生提高写作水平。约翰·华纳在他的书《为什么他们不会写》中讨论了学生写作不好的原因,以及如何提高他们的写作水平。沃纳在多所大学担任了20年的写作讲师,他已经建立了一个坚实的框架来解决学生写作困难的根本原因,并帮助他们发展为作家。那么他们为什么不会写字呢?有趣的是,原因并不是移动设备、缺乏严格的教学、糟糕的教学或懒惰的学生。相反,沃纳写道,这是因为我们过于注重教学生如何“正确”写作,也就是说,以标准的格式写作。还记得那篇五段文吗?这是目前K-12教育中写作教学的主要形式。对于那些有幸不需要学习这种特殊写作格式的人来说,五段文章包括一个引言段,三个解释或观点发展的段落,以及一个通常以“总结,……”开头的结论段。最重要的是,每个段落必须有三到五个句子,每个句子需要五到九个单词。这是一种非常严格的格式,既不适合科学写作,也不适合创造性写作。如果这种格式如此糟糕,那我们为什么还要使用它呢?华纳解释说,原因在于标准化测试。例如,SAT写作部分的阅卷员最多有三分钟的时间来评分每篇文章。虽然SAT不再包括写作部分,但其他标准化写作考试的分数相似。此外,学生们经常被告知(或发现),内容的准确性是第二位的,多音节的单词和听起来很有气势的短语。毕竟,如果有人为了达到分数而疯狂地浏览一篇文章(是的,计分人是有分数的),他们没有时间去分析那些华丽句子的实际含义,很可能会根据词汇给文章打好分。华纳还指出,在写作教育中还有其他问题,这些问题在我们当前的教育体系中是普遍存在的。这些问题包括加强对学生的监督,不断追求缺乏研究支持的教育潮流,认为技术是解决所有教育问题的灵丹妙药,以及标准化考试的普及。这些问题加在一起,给教师带来了应试教学的压力,也让学生普遍觉得学校很糟糕。有趣的是,沃纳指出,学生们普遍喜欢学习。他们只是不喜欢上学。沃纳写道,这并不奇怪,因为对标准化考试的关注造成了巨大的压力和焦虑,更不用说学生们经常意识到,他们为通过考试所做的所有记忆在现实世界中没有多大用处。那么,我们能做些什么来帮助学生成为更好的作家呢?华纳对写作教学提出了几个关键的改变。首先,学生需要写作经验。但这些不应该局限于通常的学期论文。相反,应该鼓励学生写对他们有意义的话题。这将有助于激励他们真正思考他们在写什么,并做到最好。学生们还需要学习如何像作家一样思考。他们想表达什么观点?谁是观众?他们需要哪些知识来成功地陈述他们的论点?考虑所有这些问题将有助于学生恰当地构思他们的写作。此外,也许最重要的是,学生需要学习写作过程,并对自己的工作负责。他们需要经历起草、修改和润色文章的过程。在有经验的作家的指导下这样做更有益,因为学生可以看到一个更有经验的作家是如何解释他们的作品的,以及他们有什么改进的建议。所有这些都很棒,但这些都是相当大的变化。如何实现这些目标?沃纳承认,要让学生成为更好的作家,没有捷径可走。他在书的最后提出了一些建议,建议如何开始实施上面讨论的关键变化,并邀请每个人参与关于教学和学习写作的讨论,以及我们如何开始改进它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science Education
Journal of Food Science Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) publishes the Journal of Food Science Education (JFSE) to serve the interest of its members in the field of food science education at all levels. The journal is aimed at all those committed to the improvement of food science education, including primary, secondary, undergraduate and graduate, continuing, and workplace education. It serves as an international forum for scholarly and innovative development in all aspects of food science education for "teachers" (individuals who facilitate, mentor, or instruct) and "students" (individuals who are the focus of learning efforts).
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Flipped laboratory classes: Student performance and perceptions in undergraduate food science and technology Next steps Student perspectives of various learning approaches used in an undergraduate food science and technology subject Grab the opportunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1