Why are consumers dissatisfied? A text mining approach on Sri Lankan mobile banking apps

IF 2.2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0027
Maas Sherina Sally
{"title":"Why are consumers dissatisfied? A text mining approach on Sri Lankan mobile banking apps","authors":"Maas Sherina Sally","doi":"10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe motivation of this study is to identify whether the overall rating of a banking app actually reflects the customer opinion and to find the causes for reduced ratings. Thus, these causes lead to the dissatisfaction of customers. Additionally, these insights reflect the overall rating of the app and it is a source of information to the executive management to contemplate on their services and take timely and effective decisions to improve their mobile app.Design/methodology/approachThis research was conducted on ten reputed Sri Lankan mobile banking apps to analyze the textual opinions of the customers. Data were collected from the Google Play Store considering the higher Android consumers in Sri Lanka. Each review was automatically classified into a relevant sentiment (positive, negative or neutral). These classified reviews were examined along with its rating to identify any discrepancies. The trends of the positive and negative reviews of each app were observed separately along with time. Topic modeling techniques were used to identify the causes of such behavior.FindingsAlthough banks expect to perpetuate good customer reviews all the time, there were aberrant negative trends observed during certain time ranges. The results revealed that unstable versions after recent updates, bad customer service, erroneous functional and nonfunctional features are the root causes toward the dissatisfaction of the customers.Originality/valueNo previous study has been done on the textual reviews of Sri Lankan mobile banking apps. Most studies had considered analyzing the reviews of the app on the entire period of its usage, whereas this research finds the trends where negative reviews surpass the positive reviews and analyze the causes of such behavior.","PeriodicalId":45291,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-02-2023-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe motivation of this study is to identify whether the overall rating of a banking app actually reflects the customer opinion and to find the causes for reduced ratings. Thus, these causes lead to the dissatisfaction of customers. Additionally, these insights reflect the overall rating of the app and it is a source of information to the executive management to contemplate on their services and take timely and effective decisions to improve their mobile app.Design/methodology/approachThis research was conducted on ten reputed Sri Lankan mobile banking apps to analyze the textual opinions of the customers. Data were collected from the Google Play Store considering the higher Android consumers in Sri Lanka. Each review was automatically classified into a relevant sentiment (positive, negative or neutral). These classified reviews were examined along with its rating to identify any discrepancies. The trends of the positive and negative reviews of each app were observed separately along with time. Topic modeling techniques were used to identify the causes of such behavior.FindingsAlthough banks expect to perpetuate good customer reviews all the time, there were aberrant negative trends observed during certain time ranges. The results revealed that unstable versions after recent updates, bad customer service, erroneous functional and nonfunctional features are the root causes toward the dissatisfaction of the customers.Originality/valueNo previous study has been done on the textual reviews of Sri Lankan mobile banking apps. Most studies had considered analyzing the reviews of the app on the entire period of its usage, whereas this research finds the trends where negative reviews surpass the positive reviews and analyze the causes of such behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费者为什么不满意?斯里兰卡移动银行应用程序的文本挖掘方法
本研究的动机是确定银行应用程序的整体评级是否真正反映了客户的意见,并找到评级降低的原因。因此,这些原因导致客户的不满。此外,这些见解反映了应用程序的整体评级,它是执行管理层考虑其服务并采取及时有效决策以改进其移动应用程序的信息来源。设计/方法/方法本研究是对十个著名的斯里兰卡移动银行应用程序进行的,以分析客户的文本意见。考虑到斯里兰卡较高的Android用户,我们从b谷歌Play Store收集数据。每条评论都会被自动分类为相关的情绪(积极、消极或中性)。这些分类评论与其评级一起进行了检查,以确定是否存在差异。随着时间的推移,我们分别观察了每款应用的正面评价和负面评价的趋势。主题建模技术用于确定此类行为的原因。尽管银行希望一直保持良好的客户评价,但在某些时间范围内,也观察到异常的负面趋势。结果表明,最近更新后的版本不稳定,糟糕的客户服务,错误的功能和非功能特性是导致客户不满意的根本原因。原创性/价值之前的研究已经对斯里兰卡移动银行应用程序的文本审查进行了研究。大多数研究考虑的是分析应用在整个使用期间的评论,而本研究发现了负面评论超过正面评论的趋势,并分析了这种行为的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Six classes named entity recognition for mapping location of Indonesia natural disasters from twitter data Evaluation of predicted fault tolerance based on C5.0 decision tree algorithm in irrigation system of paddy fields Manifold embedded global and local discriminative features selection for single-shot multi-categories clothing recognition and retrieval Exploring the differentiated elderly service subsidies considering consumer word-of-mouth preferences TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1