An assessment of health and safety practices for employees at health care institutions within the city of Mersin

G. Ersoz, Ali Koray Kenziman, H. Aktas, A. Kurt
{"title":"An assessment of health and safety practices for employees at health care institutions within the city of Mersin","authors":"G. Ersoz, Ali Koray Kenziman, H. Aktas, A. Kurt","doi":"10.20518/tjph.458199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this research was to assess employee health and safety practices, in public and private healthcare institutions providing services in the city of Mersin. Methods: The data of this descriptive study was collected through questionnaires conducted in September 2015. Thirty-four healthcare institutions in total were included for this work. These institutions have been providing second and third tier health services for the city center, as well as the surrounding districts of Mersin. Results: When assessed in terms of the number of employees in occupational health and work safety services, only 10.1% of health workers were found to have satisfactory access to occupational physicians, whereas only 0.8% received enough support from occupational health and safety experts. When the access to both the occupational physicians and the occupational health and safety experts were evaluated together, only 0.8% of the health workers were found to be able to receive adequate contact time. In 2014, 52.9% of the employees were examined periodically and 94.1% of the institutions had established risk assessments. Conclusion: In Mersin, only 1% of the health workers are provided with occupational health and work safety services for a sufficient period of time by occupational physicians and occupational health and safety experts. This has been highlighted as a major shortcoming.","PeriodicalId":30432,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Public Health","volume":"16 1","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20518/tjph.458199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this research was to assess employee health and safety practices, in public and private healthcare institutions providing services in the city of Mersin. Methods: The data of this descriptive study was collected through questionnaires conducted in September 2015. Thirty-four healthcare institutions in total were included for this work. These institutions have been providing second and third tier health services for the city center, as well as the surrounding districts of Mersin. Results: When assessed in terms of the number of employees in occupational health and work safety services, only 10.1% of health workers were found to have satisfactory access to occupational physicians, whereas only 0.8% received enough support from occupational health and safety experts. When the access to both the occupational physicians and the occupational health and safety experts were evaluated together, only 0.8% of the health workers were found to be able to receive adequate contact time. In 2014, 52.9% of the employees were examined periodically and 94.1% of the institutions had established risk assessments. Conclusion: In Mersin, only 1% of the health workers are provided with occupational health and work safety services for a sufficient period of time by occupational physicians and occupational health and safety experts. This has been highlighted as a major shortcoming.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对梅尔辛市卫生保健机构雇员健康和安全做法的评估
目的:本研究的目的是评估梅尔辛市提供服务的公立和私立医疗机构的员工健康和安全做法。方法:本描述性研究于2015年9月通过问卷调查收集数据。共有34家医疗卫生机构参与此项工作。这些机构一直在为市中心以及梅尔辛周边地区提供二级和三级保健服务。结果:在职业卫生与安全服务从业人员数量评估中,仅有10.1%的卫生工作者对职业医生的服务感到满意,仅有0.8%的卫生工作者得到职业卫生与安全专家的足够支持。当同时评估职业医生和职业健康与安全专家的接触情况时,发现只有0.8%的卫生工作者能够获得足够的接触时间。2014年,52.9%的从业人员定期接受检查,94.1%的机构建立了风险评估。结论:在梅尔辛,只有1%的卫生工作者得到职业医生和职业卫生与安全专家提供的足够时间的职业卫生与安全服务。这已被强调为一个主要缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Heat-wave associated vibriosis in Russia, 2003-2021 Investigation of all-cause mortality and associated factors in patients diagnosed with COVID-19: A Cohort Study Fig Tree Leaf Caused Phytodermatitis: A Case Report THE EFFECT OF MEDIA USE ON THE INTERGENERATIONAL PERCEPTION OF HEALTH RISKS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: QUANTITATIVE SHORT REPORT OF MALTEPE UNIVERSITY SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROJECT Infant mortality before and during COVID-19 pandemic in a district of Istanbul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1