A decade of revitalizing UN work concerning freedom of religion or belief (2010–2020)

IF 1 2区 社会学 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Human Rights Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1080/14754835.2022.2158724
H. M. Haugen
{"title":"A decade of revitalizing UN work concerning freedom of religion or belief (2010–2020)","authors":"H. M. Haugen","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2022.2158724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The first decade of the 21st century had annual United Nations (UN) resolutions on the defamation of religion, followed by a shorter period with resolutions on promoting human rights and fundamental freedom through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind. However, in 2011, the strongest promoter of the defamation of religion resolutions, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), chose to shift the focus in the UN on individual victims, not the religions as such, resulting in the Istanbul Process. Moreover, the exploration of links between Articles 18, 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resulted in the Rabat Plan of Action. Other progress within freedom of religion or belief include the Faith4Rights resources, acknowledging the right to change one’s religion and stopping violations in the name of \"honour,\" as well as other approaches, that so far have inadequate impact on the domestic level.","PeriodicalId":51734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2022.2158724","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The first decade of the 21st century had annual United Nations (UN) resolutions on the defamation of religion, followed by a shorter period with resolutions on promoting human rights and fundamental freedom through a better understanding of traditional values of humankind. However, in 2011, the strongest promoter of the defamation of religion resolutions, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), chose to shift the focus in the UN on individual victims, not the religions as such, resulting in the Istanbul Process. Moreover, the exploration of links between Articles 18, 19 and 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights resulted in the Rabat Plan of Action. Other progress within freedom of religion or belief include the Faith4Rights resources, acknowledging the right to change one’s religion and stopping violations in the name of "honour," as well as other approaches, that so far have inadequate impact on the domestic level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
振兴联合国宗教或信仰自由工作十年(2010-2020年)
摘要在21世纪的第一个十年里,联合国每年都会通过关于诽谤宗教的决议,随后在更短的时间里通过关于通过更好地理解人类传统价值观来促进人权和基本自由的决议。然而,2011年,诽谤宗教决议的最有力推动者伊斯兰合作组织(OIC)选择将联合国的重点转移到受害者个人身上,而不是宗教本身,从而促成了伊斯坦布尔进程。此外,对《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第十八条、第十九条和第二十条之间联系的探讨产生了《拉巴特行动计划》。宗教或信仰自由方面的其他进展包括信仰4权利资源,承认改变宗教的权利,制止以“荣誉”为名的侵犯行为,以及迄今为止对国内影响不足的其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Practitioner’s perspective on human rights education: Key resources Digital human rights storytelling and its palimpsests: (De-) constructed images of ethnic cleansing in Myanmar Ambiguous marital identity and conflict: A study of the half-widows in Jammu and Kashmir Stop blaming the farmer: Dispelling the myths of ‘misuse’ and ‘safe’ use of pesticides to protect health and human rights Dancing around gender expression and sex talk: LGBTQ+ asylum policy in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1