The Beliefs of Scientific Researchers About Which Professions Are the Most Suitable for Their Children and Grandchildren

A. Varshavsky, N. Vinokurova, E. Kochetkova
{"title":"The Beliefs of Scientific Researchers About Which Professions Are the Most Suitable for Their Children and Grandchildren","authors":"A. Varshavsky, N. Vinokurova, E. Kochetkova","doi":"10.1080/10610154.2021.1951049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a survey of scientific researchers and academic instructors that questioned the expert respondents about the field they would advise their children and grandchildren to enter and which of these career paths would be the most suitable (promising) for the rising generation in 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. If they recommended a scientific, engineering, or technical career, then a follow-up question was asked about which new areas they would recommend and which scientific disciplines they thought would be the most relevant in 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. The results of the survey showed that the respondents prefer that their children and grandchildren choose a career in science, health care, education, or culture and the fine arts, although a fairly large number of the answers exhibited a preference that their children enter engineering. It is notable that finance came in near the bottom of the list, beating out only trade and agriculture among the least popular fields. We analyzed the survey responses across various dimensions, including gender, geographical location, and other criteria. Apparently, the selected priorities reflect the hopes of the respondents that their priorities for the economy will win out eventually and their understanding of the role that science should play in society, since they justified their responses by stating that by pursuing careers in scientific research, young people would be able to benefit Russia. They also reported that they thought Russian society could benefit from more specialists in culture and fine art, teachers and educators, and service personnel in the armed forces. Respondents indicated that they believed that there was a fairly significant gulf between the values and preferences of scientific researchers, educators, instructors, and employees of cultural heritage institutions, on the one hand, and popular opinion, on the other.","PeriodicalId":85546,"journal":{"name":"Sociological research","volume":"58 1","pages":"158 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610154.2021.1951049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents the results of a survey of scientific researchers and academic instructors that questioned the expert respondents about the field they would advise their children and grandchildren to enter and which of these career paths would be the most suitable (promising) for the rising generation in 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. If they recommended a scientific, engineering, or technical career, then a follow-up question was asked about which new areas they would recommend and which scientific disciplines they thought would be the most relevant in 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. The results of the survey showed that the respondents prefer that their children and grandchildren choose a career in science, health care, education, or culture and the fine arts, although a fairly large number of the answers exhibited a preference that their children enter engineering. It is notable that finance came in near the bottom of the list, beating out only trade and agriculture among the least popular fields. We analyzed the survey responses across various dimensions, including gender, geographical location, and other criteria. Apparently, the selected priorities reflect the hopes of the respondents that their priorities for the economy will win out eventually and their understanding of the role that science should play in society, since they justified their responses by stating that by pursuing careers in scientific research, young people would be able to benefit Russia. They also reported that they thought Russian society could benefit from more specialists in culture and fine art, teachers and educators, and service personnel in the armed forces. Respondents indicated that they believed that there was a fairly significant gulf between the values and preferences of scientific researchers, educators, instructors, and employees of cultural heritage institutions, on the one hand, and popular opinion, on the other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科研人员对哪些专业最适合他们的子女和孙子女的信念
摘要本文介绍了一项针对科学研究人员和学术导师的调查结果,该调查询问了专家受访者,他们建议子女和孙辈进入哪个领域,以及这些职业道路中哪一条最适合(有前途)未来5年、10年、15年和20年的新生代。如果他们推荐了一个科学、工程或技术职业,那么接下来的问题是,他们会推荐哪些新领域,以及他们认为在5年、10年、15年和20年内哪些科学学科最相关。调查结果显示,受访者更喜欢他们的子女和孙辈选择科学、医疗保健、教育或文化和美术领域的职业,尽管相当多的受访者表示他们的子女更喜欢进入工程领域。值得注意的是,金融业几乎垫底,在最不受欢迎的领域中仅次于贸易和农业。我们分析了不同维度的调查结果,包括性别、地理位置和其他标准。显然,所选择的优先事项反映了受访者的希望,即他们对经济的优先事项最终会胜出,以及他们对科学在社会中应该发挥的作用的理解,因为他们认为,通过从事科学研究,年轻人将能够使俄罗斯受益。他们还报告说,他们认为俄罗斯社会可以从更多的文化和美术专家、教师和教育工作者以及武装部队的服务人员中受益。受访者表示,他们认为科学研究人员、教育工作者、教师和文化遗产机构员工的价值观和偏好与大众舆论之间存在相当大的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z: Youth Under the Rule of Putin A Study of Russia’s Demographic Problems in the Twenty-First Century The Role of the Geographical Factor in the Formation and Development of Human Potential The Social Functions of a Rural Teacher (on the Example of Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) Russian Parental Values in the Cross-Country Context from 1990–1991 to 2017–2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1